Sabitlenmiş Tweet
imagine telling every startup they have to build AWS before they can launch their product
we'd call that unnecessary complexity
yet in blockchain, we've accepted something surprisingly similar
want your own chain today? first you solve a few things
» consensus
» networking
» validators
» security
all before a single user touches your actual product
that tradeoff made sense when blockchains were still proving themselves
i'm not convinced it does anymore
ai changed how software gets built
» small teams building what once needed entire orgs
» products shipping in weeks instead of years
» the bottleneck moving from writing software to everything around it
that's what made me pay attention to @CNPYNetwork
not another layer 1
a different question entirely: why does this still have to be this hard?
because another chain doesn't solve the problem if building one is still the hardest part
most people focus on the "around 200 lines of code"
the real story is what the missing thousands of lines represent
» less time rebuilding infrastructure
» more time building products
» more room to experiment
instead of picking between shared infrastructure forever or an l1 from scratch, projects get a middle path
» start with shared security
» grow independent when ready
» no forced tradeoff on day one
that's what ai native infrastructure means to me
not asking ai to write more code
removing work developers shouldn't have to repeat in the first place
will this model prove itself
only mainnet answers that
but Canopy is asking the right question
if ai keeps making software easier to build, should launching a blockchain still be the hardest part?
English
