C H A D V A N H E L S I N G

@TaraBull Don’t Europeans already wear these types of shoe? They make them using wood

The newest Adidas running shoe just dropped. The Adizero Prime X Evo - price $500

@warapuri Rad

ただひたすらGoogle Map をVR飛行するだけで楽しい！まさに夢のようだー

@MiddleOfMayhem To sow fear among humans, an Imperial Star Destroyer isn’t needed Just use a balloon Stormtrooper So - to stage an alien invasion . . . it wouldn’t take as much effort as expected The hard part is making people believe we’re already under alien influence & that’s already done

The mainstream media, members of Congress and conspiracy click farmers are saying this "UFO" might be a spooky alien "humanoid". It's a Star Wars Stormtrooper balloon.

@lemire I think LeCun is speaking beyond LLMs LeCun is speaking to AI operating in the real world - they’re not real world understanding machines, yet A cat is more intelligent than an AI, in the real world, is his example If AI is so good, why don’t we seem humanoids everywhere?

I am getting tired of reading 'experts' like LeCun repeatedly claiming that our AIs are nowhere near human-level intelligence. Let us look at the evidence. US universities rank students based on standardized tests like the SAT. Current AIs achieve near-perfect SAT scores. They also beat tests like the GRE. A few years ago, it was notable when early ChatGPT scored ~120 on an IQ test, a common measure of human intelligence. An IQ of 120 is well above average. Current AIs reportedly have IQ scores similar to those of leading scientists. It is not just in tests. I can ask an AI to produce a science paper that looks undistinguishable from what a PhD level student could do. I just have to give it the data. Better yet, from a prompt, agents can run the experiments and collect the data, and then write the papers. Those of us who try to get work done with AI know what is possible. You can't possibly just say 'this is nowhere near human-level intelligence'. In software, good AIs show a greater mastery of, say, C++, than your average software engineering professor. You could just build a formal test to prove it. The difficulty is that the professors would refuse to take your tests. At this point point, someone will object 'yeah, but your AI can't do this simple thing that we can all do'. Fine. These AIs do not have *human* intelligence. They are very much not human beings. They are something like alien intelligence. They can code straight in assembly language, but have trouble counting characters in words. But that's the result of trade-offs. A dog or a monkey can solve some problems faster than you can. But let us be fair. As a species, these AIs have definitively 'human-level intelligence'. You can't spend decades setting up cognitive tests for human beings, have these AIs beat us in these tests and then say 'well, that's not real intelligence'. Come on !

@TheProjectUnity That’s like saying which mouse speaks for the mice tribe when the human comes to them It’s so small minded & clueless Obviously, many people can’t see past the institutions that we live in & give power to Aliens will see past all that - & speak to every individual directly

Who speaks for Earth if Aliens arrive?

@StockSavvyShay Basically: Real vs Potential at this stage it’s more of gamble All it takes is one cog in the Elon business machine to fail for the whole house of X to fail Now imagine multiple cogs in the machine failing X is so Elon & tech pilled that most haven’t even thought about it

Jeff Bezos said he doesn’t know if SpaceX is worth $1.75T or $2T but has no doubt space will become a “gigantic industry.” Entire businesses will be built on top of the backbone SpaceX is creating.

@MinistryOvTrvth I was actually going for comedy here initially I had “Chad” where “me” is and the post was only one line, the first one But I made the post longer, changed “Chad” to me - and all of a sudden it’s like I’m talking to a therapist Yikes!

@MinistryOvTrvth I think that’s how most people view me yet bizarrely they also like having me as a follower Yes it’s weird - but I think most people who follow me are kind of kooky - and intelligent I’m mostly a “follow & mute” account It is what it, the human condition is a funny thing

Sometimes I follow someone because they had an interesting post but then I quickly realize they are stupid but I won't unfollow them because I don't want to look like I made a mistake

@ashleevance Ashlee & the Core crew cooking something big? Having seen this and the previous eye popping SpaceX chart you posted - you’re doing a pod with Elon? Doing the official IPO story? Both!? Rad - don’t stop

"I work in insurance. What does your company do?"

@keshavchan First image: Captain Picard rebrand Second image: Chilled Captain Kirk with shades of Captain Picard rebrand

jeff bezos rebrand needs to be studied

@Chrisgpt While everyone is adjusting their AGI timeline I’m adjusting my “AI to win a Nobel Prize” timeline

If 5.6 is cooking like this I may have to adjust my AGI timeline.

@sama It’s interesting that this news doesn’t show as trending X being a news app, this being news, it’s like X is biased against OpenAI . . .

a general-purpose model solved a major open problem in mathematics. we'll be saying this a lot over the coming years, but this is a kinda big milestone. i'm very excited for AI to greatly extend our understanding of the world, but still, i have complicated feelings today.

@MinistryOvTrvth Absolute banger Notice how no one wanted to comment? That’s called fear

Homelander is Elon if he had super powers instead of a trillion dollars

@MinistryOvTrvth Yes to this kind of rebellion Once you step over the em dash line there’s no coming back I mean- Once you step over the em dash line — there’s no coming back

I think it's time to rehabilitate — the em dash.

@Diesol Its rad soundtrack comes to mind whenever I think of the film

Drive is still one of my favorite films.

i t ’ s r a i n i n g a g a i n if you’re experiencing rain, this one’s for you

@ashleevance This explains your radiant bright glow - very noticeable in your most recent pod Congrats

Same

@TheProjectUnity We destroy ourselves every day We will incorporate AI into this self destruction, as we have done with every other tool We are the dinosaurs, AI is the comet

Do you think AI will destroy us?

Where thought leaders become gatekeepers of truth Where the algorithm seems tilted toward the pilled thought leaders, their inner circle, and the loyal little orbiters beneath them - the brown nosers, the buttock kissers, the people rewarded for echoing the approved line Unbiased, sharp, critical thought - the kind that questions the status quo, is not represented here Conformity is

@craigzLiszt Not so much hate - but I do question why I’m even here when I see biased posts engineered to inflame, stir, or sow disunity And when I see how billionaire, physicist, and coding pilled X is - where one thought leader says something and it’s swallowed, without question, as truth

what’s a product you hate but use anyway?