Chris

623 posts

Chris

Chris

@DeWiPulse

P̵u̵s̵h̵i̵n̵g̵ ̵f̵o̵r̵ ̵t̵r̵a̵n̵s̵p̵a̵r̵e̵n̵c̵y̵ ̵&̵ ̵g̵o̵o̵d̵ ̵i̵n̵c̵e̵n̵t̵i̵v̵e̵ ̵d̵e̵s̵i̵g̵n̵ play stupid games, win stupid prizes

Katılım Kasım 2021
345 Takip Edilen222 Takipçiler
Chris
Chris@DeWiPulse·
@richhomiecon @jasonbadeaux Deferring to whatever the market happens to be doing to token price offers a lot less flexibility than setting your own inflation rate
English
0
0
8
86
Connor Lovely
Connor Lovely@richhomiecon·
What specific benefits do you see uncapped token supplies having? If it’s around having more incentives, if project is doing well price should go up, which gives you that. Or a net emissions type approach where I believe HNT supply is technically uncapped and emissions continue into perpetuity
English
3
0
1
214
Jason Badeaux
Jason Badeaux@jasonbadeaux·
my most *currently* nonconsensus take: dynamic supply tokens will be consensus in ~12 months it will be a considered a bearish signal to have a fixed supply, because your project will not have the flexibility to compete over time and technology cycles
amir 🇺🇸@amirhaleem

@amerpipedream DePINs shouldn’t be valuable because they have scarce supply. they aren’t trying to be digital gold, a store of value, hard money, or anything like it. they are valuable because they provide real utility that is tied to the tokenomics. see this from @DAnconia_Crypto

English
6
16
37
2.9K
Chris retweetledi
Patrick McKenzie
Patrick McKenzie@patio11·
This is a good article. On a related note, I suspect that being a Binance US executive for a year or so may have been the best pay package ever in the tech industry.
Ramit Sethi@ramit

Amazing @GQMagazine article on a guy who goes undercover to expose financial frauds, then gets paid as a whistleblower I would love to fund more of this

English
4
9
271
32.3K
Chris
Chris@DeWiPulse·
@rdevaul You can't have it both ways. Take your pick: (1) I was right about your tokenomics on day 1 when you insulted + belittled me and told me I was confusing Xnet with a meme coin (2) you were right about your tokenmics then & you're misrepresenting them now
English
0
0
1
42
Chris
Chris@DeWiPulse·
@rdevaul You previously asserted that trying to value tokens today by looking at what fraction of the (initially planned) 24 billion supply they represented was not valid given Xnet's (initially planned) tokenomics. Now you're changing your tune. What am I missing?
English
1
0
0
50
Chris
Chris@DeWiPulse·
@RichhomieconE -at recent prices, wiping 10m tokens from the supply is like a million bucks. There weren't that many wallets holding xnet. Bunch of people have to have been hit for $10k+, right?
English
0
0
0
26
Chris
Chris@DeWiPulse·
@RichhomieconE -fwiw, if this was about a few percentage points, I wouldn't be making such a fuss -largely deferring to amir's comment on the helium stuff, but my problem isn't that 'a centralized decision was made and centralization is always bad'
English
1
0
0
30
Chris
Chris@DeWiPulse·
@RichhomieconE @EdBallou Tiny bit. I care b/c I don't like seeing DeWi projects fuck people over Depin could become something cool or could end up not being much more than a cash grab. Calling this stuff out hopefully nudges the industry towards the former
English
0
0
0
76
Chris
Chris@DeWiPulse·
@RichhomieconE @jplat12 The value of the token was always predicated on xnet fixing its token model. No one was forking up to buy a [tiny]/24 billion fraction of the project Fwiw, previously Rich was very vocal about % of total market cap not being a valid mental model for xnet
English
1
0
0
88
Chris
Chris@DeWiPulse·
Reflects badly on the xnet + depin communities that this is being viewed as a positive development rather than a mini rugpull
English
1
0
3
165
Chris
Chris@DeWiPulse·
@EdBallou @RichhomieconE If we were dealing with relatively small percentage point swings here, I'd be far more sympathetic
English
1
0
0
84
charlietango 🎈
charlietango 🎈@EdBallou·
@RichhomieconE @DeWiPulse I’ll humor this. I missed the news that a validator was being decommissioned and lost out on staking rewards for 9 months. Funds were safe though. If someone isn’t paying attention, they could get rekt.
English
1
0
0
38
Chris
Chris@DeWiPulse·
@RichhomieconE Holders that weren't following the project closely enough to catch the briefly available bridge shouldn't miss out on a 10x shift from a unilateral/centralized decision to make a massive shift in the tokenomics
English
1
0
0
60
Chris
Chris@DeWiPulse·
@jplat12 Yeah, I don't want to be too harsh on them for that since the supply reduction was arguably priced in ahead of time. But I'm baffled by the lack of principles here...so obviously unfair to the holders that didn't bridge in time
English
2
0
1
36
Jonah
Jonah@jplat12·
@DeWiPulse Internally they are framing it as that, but the token price sure is telling a different story
English
1
0
1
30
Chris
Chris@DeWiPulse·
Final thought: Imo, early token prices largely reflected the expectation that the project would eventually address/remedy the goofy tokenomics it launched with
English
0
0
2
62
Chris
Chris@DeWiPulse·
Anyhow, Rich now seems to be saying: "what could passive holders have to complain about!! their share of the total marketcap is unchanged!!" The pivot, now that the total marketcap framing suits his interests, is frustrating.
English
1
0
0
69
Chris
Chris@DeWiPulse·
Shortly after XNET was announced, I asked Rich about the massive dilution from the impending inflation of XNET's token supply. He insulted and belittled me. He acted like I was an idiot who didn't understand anything but meme coins. 🧵
ⓧ Richard DeVaul 🚀🇺🇸💪 devaul.sol@rdevaul

@NikoLeMieux @bigshaan @amirhaleem @jplat12 @RichhomieconE @DeWiPulse @xnet_fdn @XNET_Mobile @DeWiGoSite This is disingenuous - we are migrating from a 24B supply to a 2.4B supply. The natural exchange rate is 10:1. If someone uses our 10:1 bridge tomorrow or a year from now, they will hold the same fraction of ownership they did a month ago. 1:1 is a 10x bonus.

English
1
0
2
155