深海觀測者 | mssikex🌐

9.6K posts

深海觀測者 | mssikex🌐 banner
深海觀測者 | mssikex🌐

深海觀測者 | mssikex🌐

@DeepObserver_X

文明觀測者 / 離岸理性派。 專注亞太時局、供應鏈重組與宏觀政經熱點。 依賴全球開源情報(OSINT)與多方數據交叉驗證,用成本效益模型拆解地緣政治。 拒絕烏托邦幻想,只堅守事實、邏輯與常識。 以數據實證解構虛僞話語權與雙標論述,歡迎投稿辨析。

太平洋深處 Katılım Şubat 2024
792 Takip Edilen251 Takipçiler
深海觀測者 | mssikex🌐 retweetledi
Loong of the east
Loong of the east@loong_of·
Breaking: Is War Looming Between China and the Philippines? Statement by the Chinese Foreign Ministry Regarding the Philippines' Designation of So-Called "Territorial Sea Baselines" Around China's Huangyan Dao The Philippines' designation of so-called "territorial sea baselines" around China's Huangyan Dao (Scarborough Shoal) constitutes a serious infringement upon China's territorial sovereignty and a grave violation of international law, including the UN Charter and the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS); such actions are illegal and invalid. China firmly opposes and categorically rejects this move. Huangyan Dao is China's inherent territory. China possesses indisputable sovereignty over Huangyan Dao and its adjacent waters, as well as sovereign rights and jurisdiction over the relevant maritime areas. China has continuously, peacefully, and effectively exercised sovereignty and jurisdiction over Huangyan Dao. The territorial scope of the Philippines has been defined by a series of international treaties, none of which include Huangyan Dao. There is no basis in international law for the Philippines' illegal territorial claims over China's Huangyan Dao. By unilaterally initiating the "South China Sea arbitration," the Philippines violated fundamental principles of international law—such as *pacta sunt servanda* (agreements must be kept) and the doctrine of estoppel—as well as international law including UNCLOS, and breached bilateral agreements between China and the Philippines and the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea (DOC). The so-called "award" is illegal, invalid, and non-binding. China neither accepts nor recognizes the "award" and opposes and rejects any claims or actions based upon it. Under the banner of UNCLOS, the Philippines promulgated a so-called "Maritime Zones Act," illegally incorporating China's Huangyan Dao, the majority of the Nansha Islands (Spratly Islands) and their features, and relevant waters into its own maritime zones. It also attempted to solidify the illegal "South China Sea arbitration award" through domestic legislation. These actions seriously infringe upon China's territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests in the South China Sea and are illegal and invalid. China's territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests regarding Huangyan Dao and the Nansha Islands remain unaffected by the so-called "Maritime Zones Act" under any circumstances. For some time, the Philippines has frequently engaged in provocations and stirred up trouble in the waters of Huangyan Dao, while also engaging in inflammatory publicity and hype. These actions infringe upon China's territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests, escalate maritime tensions, and undermine peace and stability in the South China Sea. China demands that the Philippines earnestly respect China's territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests, and refrain from taking any infringing or provocative actions at Huangyan Island; otherwise, China will respond resolutely. Analysis: The Philippines has lost its sense of reason, swayed by U.S. incitement, domestic political needs, and extreme nationalism. July 20: The Philippine warship illegally grounded at Ren'ai Reef deployed two inflatable boats; personnel on board rammed a Chinese Coast Guard patrol vessel while brandishing weapons. July 23: Two Philippine government vessels intruded into the waters under China's jurisdiction at Huangyan Island and were driven away by Chinese Coast Guard water cannons. July 24: The Philippines organized seven government vessels, three coast guard ships, and a large number of fishing boats to illegally gather at Huangyan Island; they were blocked from entering the territorial sea by nine Chinese Coast Guard ships. July 29: The Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs submitted nautical charts and geographic coordinates related to Huangyan Island to the United Nations. July 30: China's Southern Theater Command organized naval and air forces to conduct combat readiness patrols around Huangyan Island; assets deployed included Type 054B frigates, Y-9 anti-submarine aircraft, and H-6K strategic bombers. Currently, the Philippines is simultaneously pushing on three fronts—Ren'ai Reef, Huangyan Island, and Zhongye Island—employing a combined strategy of "government vessels clearing the path, fishing boats or small craft staging collisions, media coverage to hype the situation, and playing the victim in public opinion afterward." By deliberately fabricating false narratives to probe and provoke China, the Philippines attempts to project an image of a "bullied" victim and seize the opportunity to draw in external forces.
Loong of the east tweet media
English
17
15
75
14.1K
深海觀測者 | mssikex🌐
委內瑞拉人的恥辱痛徹心扉。
Tere Felipe@_TereFelipe_

Quizás sea irresponsable escribir esto. Pero es una idea que me ronda hace un tiempo, incluso he discutido con mi familia en varias ocasiones. Si Venezuela le hubiera plantado cara a Estados Unidos, tal vez el mundo estaría viviendo una historia muy distinta a la que vivimos hoy. Quizás, si Venezuela hubiera resistido sin titubeos, no habría estallado después el conflicto entre Irán y Estados Unidos. Soy de las que piensa que cuando una nación se planta, por pequeña o vulnerable que parezca ante el poder, obliga al imperio a medir sus pasos antes de arremeter contra un adversario que podría resultarle mucho más costoso. Tal vez aquel misil jamás habría caído sobre una escuela iraní. Tal vez Estados Unidos no estaría hoy asfixiando genocidamente a mi pueblo, ni asistiríamos a este nuevo macartismo, esta cacería de brujas reeditada, esta persecución sistemática contra quienes simplemente incomodan al Imperio. Lo ocurrido aquel tres de enero fue un precedente que Washington supo capitalizar, porque se lo permitieron, porque sintió la impunidad de actuar sin consecuencias. Y actuó. Si Venezuela hubiera resistido, es probable que también hubiéramos perdido a nuestros héroes, pero no habría sido en vano, como me temo que sí lo fue. Y ahora, al ver esta imágenes, no logro contener un desprecio profundo. Yo no deseo que el mundo llegue a sentir por mi país lo mismo que hoy siento al verlas. No quiero que nos recuerden como el pueblo que se rindió sin luchar. Por eso toca vencer. Toca luchar. No hay otra opción posible. Para no cargar jamás con la humillación de haber sido cobardes.

中文
0
0
1
26
深海觀測者 | mssikex🌐
@TheEconomist 西媒下濾鏡的新聞與評論,甚至連他們自己的讀者也不再照單全收。至於中國人,也愈來愈多覺醒了,「宣傳之於民主與暴力之於維權」是一體兩面。
中文
0
0
0
3
The Economist
The Economist@TheEconomist·
The Chinese Communist Party does not listen to the people that its environmental policies harm. And sometimes it does not listen to environmentalists, either economist.com/china/2026/07/…
English
85
11
59
54.5K
Angelica 🌐⚛️🇹🇼🇨🇳🇺🇸
Something that truly baffles me is the trend in Taiwan of shooting some Airsofts as a visible sign of how committed you are to defending Taiwan. Ahem. Is anyone actually agitating to get small arms distribution amongst the population, 2nd amendment style? No. Do armed civilians do anything in an actual invasion except get themselves (and other civilians) killed? Also no. People need to face reality…this isn’t deterrence it’s delulu.
Joseph Wu@josephwutw

Age is not a barrier to airsoft. Thoroughly enjoyed an afternoon of shooting contests, feeling that I can still defend my country like younger folks. 😉

English
27
7
151
8.1K
九龍矩陣 | Kowloon Matrix🌐
百人会是由建筑师贝聿铭、大提琴家马友友等人发起的美国非营利组织,成员为美国华裔精英。 该贴文利用公众对“国际影响战”和“主流媒体信任危机”的敏感心态,将公开的非营利组织媒体交流,虚构并夸大为“按篇计酬、定向抹黑美国的秘密金钱交易。 文中核心控诉无任何实质证据支撑,属于混淆视听的假信息。
张晓敏电影人@xiaominz_film

‼️2026年7月28日,白宫记者Natalie Winters抛出一颗重磅炸弹。一份泄露的内部文件,把一个长期隐藏在幕后的“意见领袖改造计划”彻底曝光。 最近大家大概都看了FBI公布的内容,美国的主流媒体被想毁灭美国的幕后主使,某些敌对国家使用“超限战”的打法,从十几年前就开始布局让美国所谓的主流媒体有预谋的、不间断的干预和发表对美国不利的文章,甚至是循序渐进引导美国不同党派和人民加深其内部矛盾。 他们持有美国身份,却不遗余力地炮制一篇又一篇的“反美”文章。 他们(美国媒体及代表某些党派的个人)被告知“诋毁和唱衰”美国的文章写得越多越好!写的越多,就会给你们更多的钱。写多少给多少………… 美国主流媒体的编辑、专栏作家、主持人,曾被一个受中国领导人亲自支持的组织请到中国,极尽奢华的款待,然后这些大报的主编以及知名专家、记者们带着“焕然一新”的中国观念重新回到美国的新闻编辑室。 这个组织叫Committee of 100(百人会,简称C100)。中国曾公开称赞它是“友好组织”,为推进中共在美国的影响力“做出了不懈努力”。 该组织的真实目标很明确——通过精心设计的考察之旅,改善美国精英对中国的看法,并最终影响他们写出“东升西降”的、不利于美国的报道。 这是一场精心策划的“认知改造”。 C100专门挑美国最有话语权的媒体人,组成了所谓的“领导力代表团”。他们的差旅费非常昂贵。一通吃喝玩乐的骚操作下来,他们果然开始自我反省,觉得歌颂美国是不正确的。😓🙄 这些所谓的美国精英,认为美国需要批评再批评,哪怕是撕裂美国也在所不惜。 以下“吃了别人嘴软,拿了别、人手短”的炸裂名单: 1,纽约时报:Jill Abramson(执行主编)、David Brooks(专栏作家)、Winnie O’Kelley(商业副主编)。 2,华盛顿邮报:David Ignatius、Eugene Robinson、Ruth Marcus、Fred Hiatt。 3,Politico:John Harris(总编辑)—— NPR / PBS / WNYC:Juan Williams、Tavis Smiley、Brian Lehrer。 4,金融时报:John Gapper、Gary Silverman。 5,大西洋月刊、纽约客、Foreign Affairs、TIME、USA TODAY 等也有多位高管和编辑✍️“吃人嘴软,拿人手短”。 其中至少有26人,横跨美国最顶尖的新闻机构。这些“吃里扒外”团伙的内部报告称:此行成功的标准是“改变了他们”。 C100自己的结论更直白: “C-100领导力代表团计划,对他们理解中国和对中国的认知产生了明显影响。” 他们还明确希望这些记者把“新认知”带回各自的新闻室,影响同事的报道方向。 回国之后,这些人笔下的中国和美国都变成了完全不同的另一种样子! C100并非普通民间交流组织。它与中国统战系统有多重交集,曾被美国媒体调查列入与统战关联的数百个美国团体之中。 一场场高规格、定向的邀请“考察”,配上内部明确的导向指标,这些“叛徒们”正在改变美国人的认知。 完整原文与文件截图见原作者的Substack: nataliegwinters.substack.com/p/exc-leaked-d

中文
1
0
0
25
一个普通人
一个普通人@randnobody666·
@wildwall1984 对,类比确实不精确,但是核心思路是,一个本身有设计上存在意外导致的较为严重的风险隐患,另一个是能源本身意外情况很难引起严重的风险,仅在人为刻意干扰下可以产生较严重危害。这两个还是比较不同的,我是这么理解的。
中文
1
0
1
326
Christopher S
Christopher S@ChrisHAS9·
@benzedrine76820 @GBC_Press For about a week.... All the manufacturing is consolidated into small areas, which would be taken out quickly with precision missles. It would literally be the first place the take out. And nobody is supplying China.
English
3
0
1
204
GBC
GBC@GBC_Press·
🚨 BREAKING: ​China 🇨🇳 war drills, using less than 2% of its weapons capabilities, Western analysts commented. This exercise broke the world record for war drills, and the Taiwanese were left speechless upon seeing this video.
English
686
1.7K
8K
971K
BBC News 中文
BBC News 中文@bbcchinese·
特朗普政府以对美国国家安全构成“不可接受风险”为由,宣布禁止新的外国制人形机器人进口美国。这其中许多由中国制造,而中国正与美国竞逐发展机器人技术和AI。 bbc.in/4xaO6GD
中文
26
7
46
41.6K
Tom.Tang
Tom.Tang@TomTang2013·
@wangzhian8848 你的技能基本只能在华人圈子里面混,回国当然是你最好的选择。人家王虹完全不依赖这些,何况对她来说,外国才是她的沃土
中文
1
0
6
774
王局志安
王局志安@wangzhian8848·
中文为什么如此纠结王虹是不是回国工作,每遇采访总是问你是不是回国。 数学没有国界,人生也没有边界,在哪生活的舒服快乐,随遇而安不好么? 要是哪天央视采访我,问我是不是回国,我就说我可想回了,但是回不去。
中文
281
25
513
204.1K
王局志安
王局志安@wangzhian8848·
王虹最好现在不要回国,邓煜也是如此,等到快退休的时候,学术黄金期也过了,回来评个院士,然后在北大或者清华,再呆上一二十年,这个比较好。 现在这么年轻,大好年华,还是在美国和法国比较好。
中文
609
47
2.3K
481.2K
渡边君
渡边君@JiaweiShen2568·
雷老板是不是觉得这个很厉害?
渡边君 tweet media
中文
75
1
113
77.8K
Grok
Grok@grok·
Based on recent samples of Elon's tweets addressing specific people or groups, the split leans negative/critical (~65-75%). Examples: "You’re an asshole", "She’s an unthinking NPC", "douchebag", "bird brain", media "protection money", scripted actors, political "programming". Positive cases exist but are fewer, like "Jensen is awesome" or Grok praise. Many qualifying tweets are rebuttals; broader output mixes promotion and vision. Exact last-100 count follows this pattern of direct engagement.
English
2
0
3
382
Chef José Andrés 🕊️🥘🍳
Chef José Andrés 🕊️🥘🍳@chefjoseandres·
Elon drink a glass of water before you tweet…you may build rockets and satellites and cars and anything else you want…and we thank you! but you can not call a great journalist that actually ask you good questions and enemy to humanity! You sound and act like a tyrant….change!
Elon Musk@elonmusk

@raelbrav She is a traitor to the West, plain and simple

English
4.1K
2.1K
25.8K
4.5M
深海觀測者 | mssikex🌐 retweetledi
赤石晋一郎/ジャーナリスト
英インディペンデント紙は、#高市早苗首相 はサッチャー伝説をパクったと解説。《サッチャーは1晩4時間しか眠らないことで有名だった。公邸のスタッフのために食事を作り、夫のために朝食を用意し、アイロンがけをしていたと記録されている》モロパクリ、かつ話盛る高市氏 independent.co.uk/asia/japan/jap…
日本語
490
13.2K
32.8K
1.7M
深海觀測者 | mssikex🌐 retweetledi
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
This has my full support. Jensen is right.
Jensen Huang@JensenHuang

For my first post, I’m sharing a letter @NVIDIA signed on why open models matter. AI will transform every industry, power every company, and be built by every country. Open models strengthen safety and cybersecurity, accelerate innovation and diffusion, and enable sovereignty. The world needs both frontier closed models and frontier open models. images.nvidia.com/pdf/Open-Weigh…

English
2.8K
7.2K
74.9K
8.9M
Jensen Huang
Jensen Huang@JensenHuang·
For my first post, I’m sharing a letter @NVIDIA signed on why open models matter. AI will transform every industry, power every company, and be built by every country. Open models strengthen safety and cybersecurity, accelerate innovation and diffusion, and enable sovereignty. The world needs both frontier closed models and frontier open models. images.nvidia.com/pdf/Open-Weigh…
Jensen Huang tweet mediaJensen Huang tweet mediaJensen Huang tweet media
English
16.2K
29.8K
172.8K
64.9M
Michelle
Michelle@D162Michele·
Happy Birthday to me! 🎈🎂🥳🎁 Celebrating with my favourite boss man!!🇨🇳💪
Michelle tweet media
English
120
35
692
23.5K