Enoch🥷

I will figure it out 🤞

@OmoEkun177 @rollxfi Well said

@Defi_lawd @rollxfi If governance leads to better products and happier users, that's probably the strongest metric of all.

GM @rollxfi community 👋 One thing every DAO should ask is: How do we know if governance is actually working? It's easy to count votes. It's much harder to measure whether governance is leading to better decisions, stronger products, and a more engaged community. For me, success isn't just high voter turnout. It's seeing community feedback genuinely influence the direction of the protocol. As @rollxfi continues building its governance culture, I think measuring governance quality will matter just as much as measuring participation. What metric would you use to judge whether RollX governance is succeeding?

@Driplord_001 @rollxfi Agreed

@Defi_lawd @rollxfi Consistent participation across multiple votes is probably more meaningful than a single vote with high turnout.

@donlymik3 @D_onlyEMMY Tell am to check scores now

@D_onlyEMMY You sure you're watching the match? Spain ain't playing with fear bro

💔 Spain is playing with fear 😂😂😂😂 look at that interception from France and that quick counter attacking game by France 🤲🤲💀

@anonymist2d @rollxfi I like this method

@Defi_lawd @rollxfi I'd measure how many community suggestions actually make it into proposals or product updates.

@abebayotobi @rollxfi Couldn't agree more

@Defi_lawd @rollxfi I'd look at how transparent the decision-making process is.

@anonymist2d @rollxfi That's a great point

@Defi_lawd @rollxfi A review period could also help newer members understand the proposal before they're expected to vote.

GM @rollxfi community. One proposal I'd be interested in seeing is a community review period before every governance vote. Instead of moving straight to Snapshot, every proposal could have a few days where contributors ask questions, challenge assumptions, and suggest improvements. That way, by the time voting begins, the conversation is focused on the strongest version of the proposal, not the first draft. Good governance isn't just about voting. It's about improving ideas together before decisions are made. Would a mandatory community review phase lead to better governance, or would it just slow progress?

@abebayotobi @rollxfi Good 👍

@Defi_lawd @rollxfi I like this idea

@Driplord_001 @rollxfi I agree

@Defi_lawd @rollxfi My only concern is that it shouldn't delay urgent proposals

@wisdomfinance_ Rollx is heading towards the right direction

i think the first proposal set the tone for what RollX wants to become. seeing 99.09% support is encouraging, but what interests me more is what comes next. the real test isn't whether the community can agree on one proposal, it's whether governance keeps tackling the difficult decisions that shape the platform over time. personally, i'd like to see more proposals around product improvements that traders actually use every day. if you had the chance to submit one proposal to @rollxfi , what would you want the community to vote on first?

@anonymist2d @rollxfi I think that would help a lot

@Defi_lawd @rollxfi I'd love to see a simple one-page summary before every vote

GM @rollxfi ☀️ One metric I'd pay closer attention to isn't TVL or trading volume. It's governance participation. A DAO becomes stronger when more people read proposals, ask questions, and vote—not just when more capital flows in. I'd rather see 500 informed voters than 5,000 passive token holders. As @rollxfi continues to grow, making governance easier to understand could be just as important as adding new features. If you could improve one thing about governance participation on R @rollxfi, what would it be?

@Driplord_001 @rollxfi Exactly

@Defi_lawd @rollxfi I agree with the 500 informed voters idea.

@OmoEkun177 @rollxfi That's a great point

@Defi_lawd @rollxfi Governance participation shouldn't be measured by votes alone. Asking good questions is just as valuable.

GM @rollxfi community 👋 @rollxfi 's first governance vote showed strong support for exploring expansion beyond Base. Now comes the harder question: How do we expand without weakening community ownership? Growth brings new users, liquidity, and opportunities. But it also makes governance more complex. The challenge isn't just scaling the protocol—it's ensuring long-term contributors continue to have meaningful influence as the community grows. To me, successful expansion isn't measured by the number of ecosystems @rollxfi reaches. It's measured by whether governance becomes stronger alongside that growth. What safeguards would you put in place to ensure expansion strengthens, rather than dilutes, community governance?

GM @rollxfi ☀️ When people talk about "valuable contributors," trading volume is usually the first metric that comes up. But I don't think that's the full picture. A healthy protocol also depends on people who: • Give thoughtful governance feedback • Report bugs before they become problems • Create educational content • Help onboard new users • Keep governance discussions active If @rollxfi ever expands contributor rewards, I'd rather see impact rewarded than activity alone. What contribution do you think is the most undervalued in the @rollxfi ecosystem today?

@abebayotobi @rollxfi Well said brother.

@Defi_lawd @rollxfi Confidence comes from understanding. The easier it is to follow proposals, the more likely people are to vote consistently.

GM @rollxfi comm 👋 One thing I've noticed across many DAOs is that governance participation drops after the first few votes. Usually it's not because people don't care. It's because they don't know: • What changed since the last proposal • Why a proposal matters • How their vote could affect the protocol I think @rollxfi could increase long-term participation with simple proposal summaries, voting reminders, and post-vote recaps. Good governance isn't just about getting people to vote. It's about helping them vote with confidence. What's one thing that would make you more likely to participate in every @rollxfi governance vote?

@rollxfi I'd probably trust the AI's judgment more often, but I'd still want the final say. The consequences of a decision are ultimately mine, so accountability shouldn't be outsourced, even if the analysis is.

Interesting.🤔 Most people said they’d never delegate judgment or risk management to AI. But here’s a harder question: If AI eventually becomes better than you at judgment… Would you still insist on making the final decision yourself? Why? 👇