Denys Borysko

@stark0xbt After this video I'm already starting to learn AI😎

Bill Gates uses AI for 5 daily tasks. Every one of them saves him hours he can't buy back. Meeting summaries. Book digests he doesn't have time to read. Speech drafts. Poems. Songs. At Gates' hourly value (~$500K), the 30 hours a week he saves is $15M/week in bought-back time. The reveal isn't that he uses AI. The reveal is that his stack is boring — 5 tasks any beginner could copy by tonight. He didn't build a custom agent. He didn't fine-tune a model. He didn't wait for GPT-6. He opened the chat and started summarizing meetings. His edge isn't the model. His edge is that he actually uses it, every day, for the boring stuff. Would you rather save 30 hours a week running his 5 tasks — or spend another year "thinking about learning AI"?

@Liquiddeny Good info)

OBSIDIAN'S CEO DROPPED 5 FREE SKILLS. HE'S CHARGING $2,200 EACH TO INSTALL THEM. 6 CLIENTS. $9,000/MO. No SaaS. No wrapper. No API resale. The skills sat public. Most gave a like. He read it and thought: who would pay to have this in-house? Law firms. Agencies. Medical practices. All run on one fragile system — critical knowledge in one head until that head leaves. At 0:07 the GitHub repo is right there — those are the free skills he sells the installation of. His loop: > Pulls 3 years of client files into one vault > Connects Claude, hardens permissions > Delivers in 3 days $2,200 setup. $1,500/mo. 6 clients. 10 hours a week. Five skills from the CEO. One business on top of them. Would you keep downloading free tools — or start delivering them for $2,200 a client?

@drakefomo Great, I'm starting to work😊🫡

@caldervol The girls are really beautiful)

ONE PHONE ON THE FLOOR. +$4,900 A MONTH. SAME CLASSES SHE'S BEEN TEACHING FOR YEARS. No course. No brand deals. No transformation story. She props her phone at mat level during class and lets it run. At 0:02 — no crew, no angle, just phone-height view of her adjusting a girl mid-stretch. No staging. Just the room. People don't stop for tutorials. They stop for moments. Her loop: > Phone rolls during every class > AI finds moments, cuts clips, writes captions > Schedules a full week from one paid class Empty slots became full. Full became a waitlist. She raised prices, added an evening slot — sold out from the list. +$4,900/month from the same job. The room is already paying you. The camera makes the room bigger. Would you keep teaching the same class for the same paycheck — or let the room fill itself twice?

ONE GUY. ONE COMMAND. HIS SELF-BUILT AI JUST SHIPPED THE CAMPAIGN A $1B BRAND HIRES A 20-PERSON AGENCY FOR. No designer. No brief. No revisions. He built it himself on top of Claude Code. Asks for creative — the model returns finished ads that look studio-shot. At 0:03 the screen shows the full set — Miami vacation, energy drinks, spa campaigns. All generated in one pass, all agency-quality. His loop: > One command with brand tone and vertical > Claude Code runs sub-agents (concept → copy → visual → format) > Ads come back finished, no editing needed > Client never asks which model made them A business paying for this doesn't care what model built it. They care the job is done, cheaper and faster than the agency they used to call. Save this. The wrapper era ends the day someone ships the result. The ones who win won't sell a smarter model. They'll sell the result. Would you keep pitching smarter models — or ship what Fortune 500 brands already pay for?

2.8M VIEWS. 130 BUYERS. $6,300 A MONTH. HER CLIPS NEVER EXPLAIN THE EXERCISE — THAT'S WHY THEY BUY. No form breakdown. No reps counted. No "why." A few seconds of a leg press. Sets flashing on screen. Gone. The clip shows just enough for someone to think "how do I actually do that?" — and the only place that gets answered is her $49 program. At 0:07 she's under the leg press with "3x10" flashing on screen. No talking, no cue. That IS the whole tutorial. Her loop: > Films 2-3 exercises whenever she trains > AI cuts, writes hooks, schedules across IG and TikTok > One workout → 20 clips → a month of content 2.8M monthly views. 130 buyers × $49. $6,300 a month. Tools: ~$40. The free clips show nothing and pull millions of eyes. The paid guide explains everything and takes their money. Instagram is the trailer. The course is the movie. Would you keep filming tutorials — or start filming the trailer for what people actually pay for?

@drakefomo I think anyone would do what makes them money, so the answer is obvious

@Liquiddeny Of course, yes, this greatly increases work productivity

$2,200 SETUP. $1,500 A MONTH. 6 CLIENTS PAID. HE'S BUILDING ROLE-SPECIFIC AI BRAINS WHILE THEIR COMPETITORS SHARE ONE CHATGPT LOGIN. No SaaS. No wrapper. No API resale. Most companies right now: one shared ChatGPT login, everyone dumping questions into the same chat. His version: one vault per company. Every employee opens the chat and it already knows their role, projects, and access level. At 0:30 the employee profile is right there — role, permissions, active projects. That's the layer OpenAI doesn't sell. His loop: > Pulls 90 days of client comms into one vault > Splits by department and role > Every employee opens a chat pre-loaded with their own context $2,200 setup. $1,500/mo. 6 clients. $9,000/month. Most companies still share one login. He's already on client seven. Save the loop. The tools change. The model doesn't. Would you keep sharing one ChatGPT login — or ship the version each person opens with their own brain already loaded?

@drakefomo Of course - It's a great way to make money

45-MINUTE BACK SESSION. $57,600 A YEAR. SHE ALMOST DIDN'T FILM IT. No script. No crew. Phone on a tripod, same workout she'd do anyway. At 0:03 she's doing band-assisted pull-ups — no explainer, no talking, just the set. Nobody bought the pull-up demo. They bought proof. Proof she trained hard, knew what she was doing, and had a program worth following. 24 people watched it and decided they wanted her running theirs. Claude does the rest: > Writes every weekly check-in > Builds every client PDF > Plans the next 30 days before she's out of the parking lot 24 clients. $200 each. $4,800/month. Running cost: under $30. The number barely moves at 5 clients or 50. That's the whole model. Every person in that gym has the same raw material. Most delete it before breakfast. The difference isn't the physique. It's that she pressed Record. Would you trade chasing one viral clip — for 24 people who send you $200 every month?

@Liquiddeny Good information!)

591-IMAGE TEXTBOOK. 2 MINUTES 21 SECONDS TO READ IT. ONE LOCAL FOLDER THAT KNOWS THE WHOLE BOOK. No study app. No cloud upload. No paid AI tutor. He imported the EPUB into Obsidian. Split it into markdown pages. Kept every image. Built one index. Connected the sections. At 0:08 hundreds of scattered nodes collapse into a single focused cluster — that's Claude pulling the linked notes for one query, all inside the vault. The whole loop runs local: > One EPUB becomes 81 linked notes across 7 chapters > 591 images preserved, none re-uploaded > Claude explains one page, compares three chapters, pulls five notes > Every answer saves back into the same folder One imported book = a searchable brain. One question surfaces 5 useful pages in seconds. Every other student is highlighting PDFs and forgetting them. He indexed his and turned it into something he can query. Would you keep re-reading textbooks — or start asking them questions?

17 YEARS OLD. 3 HOURS A DAY. $800 IN HIS FIRST MONTH FROM YOUTUBE CHANNELS HE NEVER FILMS. No face on camera. No editing suite. No personal brand. He opens his laptop in his bedroom. Three hours later he closes it and goes out with friends. That's the whole workday. At 0:04 the desk is right there — one keyboard, one mouse, YouTube analytics on screen. That's the entire "studio." He uses Claude to run a channel factory: > Pick a niche the algorithm is feeding this week > Generate the script, the voiceover, the thumbnail > Upload, monetize, move on > Run the same loop across 10 accounts in parallel Month one. $800. Zero videos he actually filmed. His classmates are grinding one channel trying to make it go viral. He's stacking ten in the background like inventory. Would you keep chasing one viral channel — or start stacking ten that print in the background?

2 GIRLS. ONE SHARED INSTAGRAM. $10,400 A MONTH FROM THE GYMS THEY ALREADY TRAIN AT. No agency. No employees. No personal brand. They ran the account as a joke — a dump for their workout clips so their personal feeds stopped flooding with sweaty selfies. Then the gym they train at reposted one video. Then asked for more. Then offered to pay. At 0:04 you see the whole studio — two girls, one treadmill setup, no crew. That's the entire production. They already film every session. They just started aiming the camera at what the gyms wanted. > One session becomes 20 clips > AI writes captions in each client's voice > Builds the 30-day calendar > Drafts the monthly report that renews the retainer 5 clients. Around $2,000 each. $10,400 a month. Cost to run all of it: under $60. That number doesn't move whether they have 5 clients or 15. Every duo at every gym is filming this content already — and letting it die in the camera roll. These two just asked one gym if it wanted to buy it. Would you keep posting workouts for likes — or start posting them for retainers?

@caldervol Why not? I'll beckon to the government anyway, and they'll even pay me for it. I think that's the best thing

A 20-YEAR-OLD STUDENT IN CHINA BUILT SOMETHING ON HIS BALCONY FOR $20. THE CITY BOUGHT IT FOR $317,000. His name is Li Hao. Nine days of work. One Claude API bill. He didn't launch a startup. Didn't pitch investors. Didn't build an app. He put an old camera on his balcony and pointed it at the intersection below. That's it. That's what the government wanted. Watch what Claude does with the feed. > Tags every car, motorbike, pedestrian in real time > 653 objects in five minutes > Clips the video when someone speeds > Reads the license plate > Matches the owner > Emails the fine automatically A normal radar takes one photo. Misses half the time. Needs an operator. Claude records full video. Nothing to dispute. Nobody on payroll. He walked into the district office with a flash drive. Asked for 10 minutes. Left with a contract. The camera never moved once. would you build this yourself if the $317,000 check was guaranteed? Or is "freelance surveillance for the government" the line you don't cross?

@caldervol 🤑🤑🤑

NVIDIA JUST OPEN-SOURCED A 3B VISION MODEL THAT FRAMES EVERY OBJECT IN A PILE OF OVERLAPPING MINIONS. NONE GET MISSED. It's called LocateAnything-3B. Throw dozens of stacked, glued-together, half-hidden Minions at it. Every one gets boxed perfectly. Overlapped, occluded, full chaos — doesn't matter. This isn't "a bit more accurate." It's a brutal jump in spatial understanding — density, occlusion, visual context, all of it. Pause on the Minion pile. Count the boxes. They line up with every face. > 3B params, runs on one consumer GPU > Detection, GUI grounding, OCR, documents — one model > 100% open source: weights, code, demo, paper The era of vision models that actually see like a human just started.