Denis(💙,🧡)

i got life sentence 😭💀 moving into @Jaileddotfun soon

@PrimordialAA @LayerZero_Labs @PrimordialAA which trashhold was for lz core min 25?

Why is it so hard to get a distribution perfect and what makes @LayerZero_Labs's case so difficult. First is just expectation vs reality. The size of that divide will always directly correlate to the amount of angst in a distribution. The number of people who have said to me. I did 50 transactions, how could I possibly only qualify for 60 ZRO? Reality: 50 transactions is 0.0000375% of overall transactions on LZ. If it was DIRECTLY tied to # of tx and it was a full 15% of overall supply being distributed you would only be eligible for 56.25 ZRO The number of users who did > 50 tx: 957,640 The number who did > 100 tx: 227,410 The number who interacted with 15+ chains: 1,075,590 Think about that, if you did 50 transactions AND hit 15+ chains and we distributed to 1M addresses you would be in the bottom 5% of addresses. Now on top of this you layer in the protocol RFP, 225 protocol submissions which I believe is even more than Arbitrum STIP! A huge amount of developers and protocol built on top of LayerZero. Ultimately devs are the core user of LZ, everyone else is using one of their apps not using LayerZero directly. Every one of these protocols is massively different. What @StargateFinance wants to distribute for is completely different than what @Angle_Finance, @MIM_Spell, @TraderJoe_xyz and @PancakeSwap may want to, which is massively different than what @gh0stlygh0sts @KanpaiPandas @pudgypenguins and @tinydinos_eth may want to. Controlling for this factor is incredibly hard. Do it by $ transferred? All NFTs or anything based on state/data/etc. get completely excluded. Vice versa? The other group is completely excluded. The only normalizing factor here is protocol fees, if everything is an agnostic packet to LayerZero than it should treat it as that. There is a reason sending $5 via an OFT does not cost any more than sending $500,000,000 on LZ if you're interacting directly. The protocol doesn't care what it is, a message is a message. Expand this to 70+ chains and almost 2.5 years of transactions... not easy! Will write up more on this when we have a full day to sit down and do it properly. Back to prepping for tomorrow!

@holasergio26 @PrimordialAA @LayerZero_Labs @PrimordialAA check this pls yesterday you write that this report is false positive

@akhileshutup @PrimordialAA @@PrimordialAA you said yesterday that this report is wrong

Let's try this again. Provisional Sybil List #2 Haven't touched Chaos/Nansen clusters. Have heard feedback. Working with their teams on these, will be updating! lzprovisionalsybil.s3.amazonaws.com/provisionalSyb… +~47,000 -158,869 Will continue to grind through all feedback for the next 24 hours

Good afternoon dear LayerZero team (@PrimordialAA, @LayerZero_Labs). I noticed that you cancelled some of the false reports, please pay attention to report 17909: commonwealth.im/layerzero/disc… Here are some arguments:👇

@kober1337 @PrimordialAA I also can't understand why Bryan don't delete this report, I never used programms in this report, but I marked that I used. I hope for correct decision of Bryan...

@PrimordialAA Dear Bryan, you said you would review the decision on report 17909. commonwealth.im/layerzero/disc… Proof: x.com/PrimordialAA/s…

@degenfi_ @PrimordialAA my wallets also in this report, I never used this soft

@PrimordialAA sir, in your X was a lot of replies about commonwealth.im/layerzero/disc… but in new file this was in list. could you check it? yesterday you said that this cluster is wrong, hope for your decision

@HectorTifa94741 @bnb_billionaire @PrimordialAA lol bro I have a lot of subs and tweets, you have 3 tweets for all time and trying to frame real users, who wants to restore justice. You are bot or on of the accs of reporter of this rubish report?

@bnb_billionaire @PrimordialAA Lazy sybils are fuming and will definitely launch their twitter campaign trying to discard this obviously accurate report. Don't fall for this @PrimordialAA

We had 14 people contributing to reviews and it looks like the definition of 'partially valid' was mismatched between some. Will definitely have some updates on this tomorrow, I think Nansen/Chaos are basically set + 90%+ of the reports but a few large clusters included that possibly should have been marked invalid and not partially valid. Absolutely must sleep so I will read nothing for a few hours. Update tomorrow afternoon most likely with more cleaned up -- wanted to give people a chance to flag obvious issues in clusters that are in secondary checks.

@vittoriomaisano @PrimordialAA me too in this report! I do txes manually! Yes, I am a drophunter, but I am not a sybil using special programms for this!!!

@PrimordialAA Brian, there are a lot of false positives here. commonwealth.im/layerzero/disc…

Provisional Sybil List Nansen Chaos All (Valid and Partially Valid) Bounty Hunter submissions dropbox.com/scl/fo/rz95eb0… We're posting this here for community review. If there is a cluster here that is wrong or a report that can be proven wrong, we will remove it. This is not for individual appeals so it's not on a per address basis. Please list clusters that are clearly wrong and *WHY* the methodology is clearly wrong or how to prove it contains false positives. Please provide feedback within the next 24 hours if possible. There are a few bounty hunter reports that have been approved but have not yet been included in the list, the list may update slightly tomorrow but 99% is here. ALL of these Bounty Hunter reports are running through secondary checks with @nansen_ai and @chaoslabs, any clusters flagged in their automated sybil flows -- we will update the final list with all clusters rejected by the secondary checks after. 1:45am so I will be sleeping for the next few hours. May God have mercy on my notifications for the morning.

@PrimordialAA I was surprised but I found several of my addresses in the list commonwealth.im/layerzero/disc…: example: 0x9a371a44f18b904c5f0881693f479ab675b41F78 0xB2F0A6f1557852CF5D35Ef53077BA2fadb34FFA7 I did not use software or referral links, I did them manually using guides finding in telegram

[11/11] Join for me in exploring the intersection of privacy and blockchain technology. Read my article to learn more about Aleo's groundbreaking approach to privacy and its implications for the future of decentralized systems. dalazarev8.medium.com/revolutionizin…

[10/11] By examining the strengths and weaknesses of different privacy solutions, we gain valuable insights into how blockchain technology can evolve to meet the needs of users in an increasingly interconnected world.

So, we know about privacy in Aleo, but how it concerns with privacy in EVM blockchains? Let's try to think! [1/11] Exploring the nuances of privacy in blockchain technology is crucial as we navigate the digital landscape. ➡️ @AleoHQ