phanen

🚀I Just published a deep dive on React Query’s useMutation hook. In this piece I break down how the observer pattern powers its behaviour, giving a clearer view of what happens under the hood. Feedback is welcomed as always. javascript.plainenglish.io/the-observer-p…

@Wale_XYZ Lol, I never ran, even during our banter days. Can’t say the same for you though. You’ve been off the grid, even on WhatsApp

@Denniman Haha, Denniman! I dey here o. You are active now that your club is doing well yeah?

At this point you have to be really baffled as to how Slot still has a job. The team has been beyond poor and we don't even show up in the big games any longer.

@FrankoRover @LOWERCASEmelton @segun_os_ Fair point but what you really mean is "software company." Boeing and Airbus are very much tech companies, the distinction you're drawing is software vs non-software.

@LOWERCASEmelton @segun_os_ A tech company is a company where tech is their core business, unlike banking or health where tech is an enabler

they're literally the lowest paid people in tech.

@purple_dera I love this. I’m 79 days into mine. Will quote this when I’m done.

I finished today.🥺❤️

Someone said “if Arsenal win any trophy make I die”. From his mouth to your ears oh God. 🙏

Gyökeres may not have been on the scoresheet, but it was his best game in an Arsenal shirt by a mile. Was shocked to see him taken off.

🤯BREAKING: Alibaba just proved that AI Coding isn't taking your job, it's just writing the legacy code that will keep you employed fixing it for the next decade. 🤣 Passing a coding test once is easy. Maintaining that code for 8 months without it exploding? Apparently, it’s nearly impossible for AI. Alibaba tested 18 AI agents on 100 real codebases over 233-day cycles. They didn't just look for "quick fixes"—they looked for long-term survival. The results were a bloodbath: 75% of models broke previously working code during maintenance. Only Claude Opus 4.5/4.6 maintained a >50% zero-regression rate. Every other model accumulated technical debt that compounded until the codebase collapsed. We’ve been using "snapshot" benchmarks like HumanEval that only ask "Does it work right now?" The new SWE-CI benchmark asks: "Does it still work after 8 months of evolution?" Most AI agents are "Quick-Fix Artists." They write brittle code that passes tests today but becomes a maintenance nightmare tomorrow. They aren't building software; they're building a house of cards. The narrative just got honest: Most models can write code. Almost none can maintain it.

@jackle994 @okkHyfa Yeah.. but I don’t think we will draw as many games as I indicated if we lose to City.

@Denniman @okkHyfa More pessimistic would be we go and lose to City away...

When the exam is so hard, you look outside and think how lucky the birds are😂

Max Dowman. The youngest ever goalscorer in the Premier League.

I’ll be a very happy man even if we win only the first three.

🤣🤣🤣🤣 anxiety incoming!

You've misquoted the argument. Nobody seriously claims "everything has a cause." The actual claim is that everything that begins to exist has a cause. God, by definition, never began to exist, so there's no contradiction and no trap. Now look at your own position. The universe began to exist — the Big Bang and thermodynamics both point to this. So by your own causality logic, it needs a cause too. When you then imply that matter or energy just always existed, you've made the exact same move you mocked the theist for. You've just replaced an eternal God with an eternal mindless universe. Same logic, weaker explanation! The "stay within science" line doesn't save you either. Science operates within the universe. It cannot tell you why the universe exists at all. That's not a scientific question, it's a metaphysical one. Invoking science here is just dodging the actual question.

You accept causality that everything must be made or created so humans must be the result of God's creation. That's the fact that every reasonable person agrees. But then you contradict yourself when asked what created God. Suddenly you retreat to "He is the one who was never created, who always existed." You've fallen into your own trap. Those who stick on causality and explain the existence with evolution are still on the reasonable side. There's no need for this discussion if we're staying within the framework of science.

@BwalaDaniel Wait, Daniel, did you just admit that you had SIX MONTHS to prepare for an interview you knew would challenge you on insecurity, the economy and corruption, yet you spent most of it saying “I’m not aware of that”? Interesting!

PRESS STATEMENT In the last 24 hours, social media has exploded over my interview with Mehdi Hassan, albeit with varied opinions. Let me set the record straight. When I signed on to the privileged job granted to me by Mr. President, I was well aware of its implications. Selling ice cream, looking fine, and seeking the praises of men were never part of it. Some of the fiercest critics of my interview can not even stand local TV anchors. But the task of promoting and defending the President and his administration is what I do with ease and joy. I am prepared to appear before any interviewer, anywhere in the world, any day and at any time, to defend this government and its policies. I have never, and will never, subscribe to ducking or dodging interviews on matters that concern promoting and defending the administration I was appointed to serve. It is the least of what is required of me. Head to Head contacted me requesting an interview, stating that they wanted to challenge our government on security, the economy, and corruption. Nowhere in our almost six months of communication did they mention that they were going to challenge my past. If that had been their plan, ethically and professionally, they were supposed to inform me so I could prepare my response. But that’s okay, ethically, that is on them, not on me. I refused to swallow the pill of Mehdi’s “opposition research-style journalism,” and even today, if you carefully compare what he read as quotes from organisations and groups, you will see that many were inaccurate and some were outright fake news. But I will leave that for another day. As for what I said about President Tinubu in the past, I am glad those were things I said when I was in the opposition saddle with such zeal. It is all politics. Half of Donald Trump’s cabinet is made up of people who once spoke against him, and quite a number of people in our own cabinet also spoke against President Tinubu in the past. Those things do not bother him if you care to know. The majority of the naysayers are members of the opposition and their sympathisers. It does not bother me one bit. Their temporary excitement over the interview has not lasted and will not last, because it does not take away their obvious problem of lack of vision, mission in conducting and managing a political party; yet they seek to manage Nigeria. Clearly they have no path to victory and no alternative policies or program for the Nigerian people. And if they say they do, they can as well go to head to head and be interrogated on that; as the saying in Hausa goes “Ga fili Ga doki” I conclude by thanking the many Nigerians and non-Nigerians who sent in their commendations over my brave defence of our government in an interview where the anchor would hardly let you answer a question unless it suited his narrative. I still have admiration and respect for Mehdi Hassan as arguably the best debater on the planet. I look forward to part two of the Head to Head interview, and I am glad that by then questions about my past will no longer be news so that we can focus on our administration’s policies, programs and what we have achieved so far. Stay tuned. – D.H Bwala Special Adviser to President on Media and Policy Communication (State House) Saturday March 7, 2026

This is the best edited video about the Daniel Bwala shameful interview. Wheoever edited this video needs to be compensated. Daniel Bwala is the most shameless human alongside Reno Omokri.

There seems to be a weird culture amongst fans and even managers of blaming Arsenal for their current position and state of the league. Teams play Arsenal twice, Arsenal being the best team in the current climate doesn’t stop you doing better in the 36 other games 👍

“Chelsea travel to the Emirates this Sunday to face Arsenal, and I want to assure you that they will not be taking all three points from that game.” Our London b**ches. 🤣

Arsenal please 🙏

I see a lot of folks praising Arteta for not taking off Gyökeres and rightly so. But for me the biggest decision was subbing Timber for Mosquera. That change gave us the defensive solidity we needed. From that point, the result never looked in doubt.