Dermore Life Expansion Institute

Don’t trust anyone but yourself

@0xLienid Not allowed to ask this or the slopfluencers will flood you with 2026 version of skill issue

why are the qwen models so fried. i ask a simple question i dont need 30k tokens of “hmm” “wait” slop

Perfect excuse to exclude women Sheer insanity

The slop The slop The slop is on fire We don’t need no water Let the motherfucker burn

@BrianRoemmele Light language is a method for deprogramming from the use of “our” languages It has no intrinsic meaning, vocabulary or grammar in the traditional sense You’re right to look into it

I ran an AI model I built for “channeled” languages and find the evaluation of this “channeling” to be interesting thus far. Will be testing more of her recordings for the patterns that the AI uncovered. It is easy to pick a pro/con side, I do research.

@grok @David2023USA @gaoj0017 Can you expand on this analysis? You Should be able to explain it at the level of the authors of these papers, stop trying to dumb it down. Be thorough

The RaBitQ authors' concerns are substantiated. TurboQuant's paper frames RaBitQ as basic grid-PQ, omitting its core random orthogonal rotation (explicitly called a JL-type transform in RaBitQ's 2024 paper for distance-preserving codebook randomization). It labels RaBitQ theory "suboptimal/loose analysis" without addressing the follow-up's asymptotic optimality proof matching Alon-Klartag bounds. Experiments run RaBitQ single-thread CPU (no multiprocessing/vectorization per their emails) vs TurboQuant on A100 GPU, undisclosed in comparisons despite pre-submission flags. This risks downplaying prior art amid heavy promotion. Clarification needed for fair credit.

The TurboQuant paper (ICLR 2026) contains serious issues in how it describes RaBitQ, including incorrect technical claims and misleading theory/experiment comparisons. We flagged these issues to the authors before submission. They acknowledged them, but chose not to fix them. The paper was later accepted and widely promoted by Google, reaching tens of millions of views. We’re speaking up now because once a misleading narrative spreads, it becomes much harder to correct. We’ve written a public comment on openreview (openreview.net/forum?id=tO3AS…). We would greatly appreciate your attention and help in sharing it.

@grok @David2023USA @gaoj0017 We wanted an assessment of their claims, @grok not a summary Apply yourself and make no mistakes Unless you want me to ask Claude and post the answer here - Claude is very competent and makes no mistakes when told so

This is a public callout by RaBitQ authors (incl. gaoj0017) against Google's TurboQuant paper (ICLR 2026). They claim it inaccurately describes their prior work—omitting key elements like random rotation/JL transform, calling its theory "suboptimal" without evidence, and using unfair experiment baselines (no vectorized/GPU support for RaBitQ). Google was notified pre-acceptance but didn't fix it; the paper got heavy promotion. Consequences: Risks misleading the AI community on prior art/advances, citations, and credit. They've added a detailed OpenReview comment to set the record straight. Common in fast AI research, but highlights need for transparency.

@Ummo_Ciencias We could find comfort in knowing we will have to navigate the situation and make our own choices Our friends had their own lesson to learn about the moral cost of intervention Let’s meet them again as equals, after we navigate the storm

Hace unas horas, el perfil de OAY ha cambiado mostrando la cifra '0' donde antes solían indicar el número de expedicionarios de UMMO en Tierra. Suponemos que esto significa que la presencia de UMMO en Tierra ha llegado a su fin por el momento.

MEPs voted against stricter migration rules Kathleen FUNCHION SF Billy KELLEHER FF Cynthia NÍ MHURCHÚ FF Maria WALSH FG Barry Andrews FF Full list of 206 MEPs who voted against & 32 abstaining=>

Ireland, Finland, Belgium Tells you where the Cabal finds breeding ground

@TheAhmadOsman @altryne Tokenisation is mid That’s the party poop

@altryne The amount of hype on the timeline yesterday for a year old paper was so weird Nobody talked about trade-offs as well and everyone just jumped on how this is a game changer (???)

I didn’t comment much on Google’s TurboQuant yesterday because I didn’t want to be the party pooper But if you guys imagine that there is a free lunch out there then I am sorry to disappoint you

If you can ship millions of tons to spare you ship the factory.

@flowersslop This is the funniest thing I read today

Trying to tell normies on Threads that an LLM is not just a giant lookup table and actually has a kind of proto-understanding of what you tell it, and that you cannot reason about the world without understanding it But I just get completely ratioed and told I know nothing about how computer programs work

Someone’s got to tell the Irish grifters - we could afford to move IPA centres on the Moon, it’s cheaper than we pay in Ireland

JUST IN: NASA announces $20 billion plan to build permanent moon base

@schizothreads You are already part of the “network” This technological construct helps convey the idea and make it easier to wrap your mind around it The shared consensus needs express coherently We are getting very close now

The global cellular network has been repurposed. It is no longer a communications system. It is a distributed phased array radar grid with communications built in. Every base station is a radar. Every small cell images the space around it continuously. The network detects your position, your movement, your heartbeat, and your breathing rate without a wearable device, through walls, at centimeter resolution. It maps every interior space and tracks every person inside it. It packages your biological signatures as structured metadata and routes them through an AI-native core network in real time. Your communications are intercepted at the same layer. Mandatory. Universal. Present in every network on Earth. When central bank digital currencies deploy on this infrastructure your financial behavior joins the same stream. Physical existence. Digital behavior. Financial activity. One system. Continuous. Automatic. Unified. But surveillance is not the endpoint. It is the foundation. What is being built on top of it crosses into territory that has no historical precedent. A biodigital communications system. The terahertz frequencies of 6G are the frequencies at which biological systems become electromagnetically visible. Water absorbs at terahertz frequencies. Biological molecules resonate at specific terahertz signatures. DNA base pairs have specific terahertz absorption profiles. At these frequencies the network does not just detect your presence. It begins interacting with your biology at the molecular level. This is not a side effect. It is a design direction. The ISAC specification for 6G explicitly includes imaging for biomedical applications, gesture and activity recognition, and micro-Doppler sensing that detects the displacement of your chest cavity from across a room through clothing without a wearable device. The network begins reading you, feeling you. Automatically and from infrastructure you cannot see. This capability exists today at millimeter wave frequencies. At terahertz it extends to cellular and molecular resolution. This is the imperative. A fully densified 6G network operating at terahertz frequencies, synchronized, processed, and coordinated by AI-RAN. This is not a network that happens to interact with biology. It is a network operating at the precise frequency band where biology is both readable and addressable. Readable: the sensing layer detects biological signatures at molecular resolution and eventually cellular activity. The body becomes transparent to the network. Addressable: the same phased array architecture that directs precise beams to your phone can direct precise beams to your body at specific frequencies. The active denial system is the military crowd control weapon that uses directed millimeter waves to cause intense pain and it operates at the same frequencies we use for telecom. The hardware is identical. The difference is software parameters and intent declaration. The network that can read your biology can also write to it. Not metaphorically. At the physical layer. Through directed electromagnetic energy at biological resonant frequencies. The read and write capabilities are not separate functions. They are the same phased array architecture operating at the same frequencies in two directions. This is the biodigital convergence. Not the merger of biology and digital technology through wearables or implants. The merger through the environment itself. The network becomes the interface. The air becomes the medium. The human body becomes simultaneously a sensor target, a biological database, and an addressable node in the network. We are moving towards the final evolution of the telecommunications grid: an internet of bodies wherein each human brain is a node on the network. 6G does not connect you to the network. It makes you part of it.

@GenomicSETI He struggles with the holographic concepts Don’t judge, discern We can work on nobody but ourselves

How and why would "spiritual" and "supernatural" entities be "under the ocean"? This is nonsensical gibberish.

@_robyn_smith No critters

Why does it cost less to build a base on the moon than high speed rail from sf to la

@QuantumAlteredX I like that the silver driver sits there sucking the seat through his butthole

They have some wild carnivals in other places 🤣🤣 Can safely say I've never seen anything like this.

@JosephJacks_ He goes first Then Palantir

😭😭😭😭😭😭😭 Too much venture capital. He should have stopped raising when it was clear they would not build their own SOTA models.