Meta☯️⚛️

Meta (adjective): (of an entity) referring to itself or to the conventions of its categories; self-referential

@plushyyprincess @copperskin722 The data used the same method of identification as the Hawass study you mentioned. It used a Combined DNA Index System with geographical region affinity being assessed by popAffiliator hence the general connection of the mummies to a region and not a specific ethnicity.

@Derpismm @copperskin722 Where does it say there is a full genome wide database reference? You’re highlighting where it says linguistics show it’s afroasiatic, not autosomal dna. Afroasiatic is not SSA like niger-congo or nilo-saharan.

"But but saar Egyptians were dark skinned, this meant they were black saar"

@plushyyprincess @copperskin722 Okay im not trying to be rude here but im sensing bad faith now because your statement on the Afroasiatic language not even being related to SSA is just flat out wrong.

@plushyyprincess @copperskin722 Ah yeah my bad, it was the Assyrians, Lybians, and Nubians that took over the third intermediate period. But they were not the native populations or the builders of the culture.

@Derpismm @copperskin722 The third intermediate period predates roman and greek rule by centuries. The burial sight of this sample is abusir-el meleq from 659 BC. The ruling elites may have had different origins from different dynasties but the local population remained pretty much the same for centuries

@plushyyprincess @copperskin722 I aint trynna toot my horn but, ive been having this conversation since I was 13 years old (im 22 now). I cant in good faith tell you to just trust me as thats not intellectually honest, but...trust me, there is a big psy-op to separate the black race from Kemet.

@Derpismm @copperskin722 Also it says SSA comparison groups weren’t included, so you can’t use it to claim strong SSA affinity in the first place.

@plushyyprincess @copperskin722 It seems youre confused. It was Schuenemann's study (the one you referenced earlier that compared the Third intermediate period populations to modern populations) that did not take in account those populations. Read within the context, its critiquing a another study.

@plushyyprincess @copperskin722 1. Where did you get there was not a reference to a gull genome wide reference database? 2. Linguisticaly Ancient Kemet was an Afroasiatic lanuage that borrowed heavily from other African phyla. And Afroasiatic goes into SSA that was just a false statement.

@Derpismm @copperskin722 The first study using STR markers is weak bc if there’s no full genome wide data/aDNA. The conclusion says ancient Egyptian is Afroasiatic, and afroasiatic is near-eastern itself unrelated to SSA language families like Niger-congo and nilo-Saharan.

Nature is peak

@n0penotnat @shitterly Shorten your life span down to zero immediately

They don't actually chose "the winnder" they signal a mass of sperm that's compatiable with its own genetic material of its location and from there they all attempt to penetrate the egg.

@plushyyprincess @copperskin722 pt.5 You still haven't commented on why Ancient Kemetians depicted themselves as having negro features

@Derpismm @copperskin722 What’s the link to this study? Bc they are very distant from every SSA group

@plushyyprincess @copperskin722 pt3. Lecture by Christopher Ehret who is an American scholar of African history and African historical linguistics. Speaks of the Sub-Sahran genesis of Pre-dynastic and early Dynastic Kemet youtube.com/watch?v=S_DD4n…

@plushyyprincess @copperskin722 pt.2 Studies show the continuity of Sub-Saharan haplogroups and physiology continued INTO the Nile pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14748828/ onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.100… onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aj…

@plushyyprincess @copperskin722 ...

@Derpismm @copperskin722 Okay but I’m asking which groups 😭 which which tribes/ethnicities in particular, I can check with a calculator but SSA is quite vague and encompasses northern Sudanese, Chadians, etc so that also matters.

@plushyyprincess Lol same

“Hi how are ya” in spongebobs voice is one of my vocal stims

@plushyyprincess @copperskin722 The populations were compared to modern day Sub-Saharan African groups. They cluster closer to Sub-Saharan Africans...This is such a silly topic because if any other group of people depicted themselves like this, no one would have questions and no these arent Nubians.

@Derpismm @copperskin722 Are they saying ancient Egyptians cluster to modern Subsaharan Africans, or that they had ‘African affinities’ which includes North Africa? There also has to be a modern population to compare the ancient ones to. Which group were the samples being compared to?

@plushyyprincess @copperskin722 That study looked at a burial site and remains from the Greco-Roman era of Egypt and compared that to modern populations, which actually proves a lack of continuity.

@plushyyprincess @copperskin722 Modern Coptic people are relatively recent as well, as they're a mixed race of people who've formed over thousands of years of diffrent nations coming and going

@Derpismm @copperskin722 Tbh archaeogenetics are in their favor. Dark skin likely referred to Nubians/Kushites of southern Egypt and may not rlly depict Coptics who have been the main population pre and post-Islamization