DFD 3D

@helpingFEers @AntiDisinfo86

A quick overview of what actually going outside and documenting things look like to prove the earth isn't flat and it is a globe #flatearth #globe #flatearthdebunked

@did8hurtu @Xentrik85 It takes one day outside to disprove flat earth. Don't worry - this isn't a FE account on X but I do have one @helpingFEers that I barely use. What I found out is X flat earthers are just as willfully ignorant at Tiktok flat earthers. Again - sundials only work on a globe.

@DigitallyForged @Xentrik85 I’m sure you and your 23 followers can figure it out

All a globe believer can bring for proof, is circular reasoning and affirming the consequent... They definitely can't show any, Curvature Motion Gas pressure without a container

@did8hurtu @Xentrik85 You can sit back down with your lack of credibility. I spent two years showing how the globe matches reality and the flat earth never does. Sites.google.com/view/helpingfl…

@DigitallyForged @Xentrik85 The fact you try and think, tells me you don't understand the experiment... It's testing the geometry of the earth... Stay retarded if you want...

@did8hurtu Oh look at the willfully ignorant. Equatorial sundials don't lay flat, vertical sundials don't lay flat, armillary dials don't lay flat. So keep making assertions with no evidence while I keep demonstrating you wrong.

@DigitallyForged Affirming the consequent... Earth is flat, sun dials only work on a flat plane... Carry on

@Xentrik85 @did8hurtu I would love to see people that say the sky can't prove the shape of the earth and stick them in a room with people like Alan and Shane. The Great Flat Earth Divide

@did8hurtu 😂😂😂 announcing your arrival to the world isn’t all the clever Nicky - true, but it reflects your IQ being <10 So which is it, the sky can prove the shape of the ground, or the sky can’t prove the shape of the ground? Because either way, FE’s baseless assertions falls apart…

@AntiDisinfo86 @space_audits You model is still broken. There is no light source coming from the position you say the sun is at in the sky. Globe model works just fine. #flatearthdebunked #globewins

@AntiDisinfo86 @LevEyal111 How about you tell me when this is right....meaning it matches what I measure outside?

@LevEyal111 You clearly have never even used it. Show me how its wrong. (its never wrong)

Still zero rebuttals to this model. No one has shown any globe anything to be present in the code... meaning... its properly displaying celestial observations without it? How is that possible globies...? Here it is: github.com/stpierrs/conce…

@AntiDisinfo86 @space_audits @PiezoAetheric I can match observed measured reality very easily on a globe. You can't. So go outside and point to the true position of the sun in the sky and then try and make up why it's there.

@DigitallyForged @space_audits @PiezoAetheric That is totally still in there. ITs GE mode. By design. Thats an equal god mode view of the same alt az observations that drive both models. That one completely depicts ptolemys two sphere model. Pretending it drives anything would be hilarious though LOL please show

oh look a standalone geocentric model using only Ptolemy's epicycles. It uses ZERO heliocentric ephemeris references, no AU, no globe radius, no circumference Pure epicycle math Shane's Model 2.0: stpierrs.github.io/conceptual_fla… Github github.com/stpierrs/conce…

@gatheredwaters @space_audits @AntiDisinfo86 @PiezoAetheric @helpingFEers #1 It doesn't match observed measured reality #2 There is no verifiable way to prove the "true position" of anything #3 Sundials don't work #4 Triangulatation doesn't work #5 Navigation doesn't work #6 Compass headings don't work All these work on a globe. You can sit down

@DigitallyForged @space_audits @AntiDisinfo86 @PiezoAetheric @helpingFEers "It takes less than 5 minutes to dismantle your model." It's been 8+ hours and I don't see anything other than your excessive overconfidence.

@gatheredwaters @space_audits @AntiDisinfo86 @PiezoAetheric @helpingFEers

@space_audits @AntiDisinfo86 @PiezoAetheric You mean the globe you have seem to have removed from your model....that one? Let's test both models and see which one matches reality from multiple locations at once. @helpingFEers

That's one of many projections of the graticule, which that isn't mutually exclusive. The sphere has a radius of 1 or when we convert it into Li, has a radius of 20,419.45 Li. We ain't even using the definition of a degree. Where's the thing that you think actually is a globe and not a coordinate system that's unites two hemispheres in time through a fictitious observer to reference where stars aren't??? Hmu when you find that globe you're looking for. All you've found so far is a unit sphere and the Tang celestial sphere.

@AntiDisinfo86 @space_audits @PiezoAetheric Weird how this was there at some point....and double weird that you can't replicate all measurements from all positions. It's so easy to dismantle your model.

@space_audits @DigitallyForged @PiezoAetheric LOL he wont find it.. but he will keep commenting about how he sees it can't find the globe in the code but he can point to the sky

@space_audits @AntiDisinfo86 @PiezoAetheric @helpingFEers

@space_audits @AntiDisinfo86 @PiezoAetheric How about you ask me what my argument is and not assert what my argument is Alan. So let's be very clear. All measurements to the celestial bodies, from all positions, at all times (let's say 99%) match a globe model. This is impossible on flat earth...so are sundials.

@AntiDisinfo86 @space_audits @PiezoAetheric Everyone watch this.... Shane please show everyone where I claimed "I could show the code" when I stated the measurements are what were coming from a globe while also stating you were trying assert only one way to show the globe. Maybe I can dismantle your model on X like on TT.

@DigitallyForged @space_audits @PiezoAetheric LOL thanks man. this has been really fun remember when you claimed you could show the code proving it was using heliocentric constants, but then ran super hard away from that claim when you figured out that was false I remember ..

@AntiDisinfo86 @space_audits @PiezoAetheric Incorrect - you claim it but it's not measured that way. This is why you can't triangulate anything on your model from multiple locations and you are going to run away from that as well. Another error on your model - you show two angles measuring the same. Reality Fail

@DigitallyForged @space_audits @PiezoAetheric Incorrect. That's the celestial bodies being depicted in the hemisphere in which they are observed. For both models. one model cannot own observations. That would be retarded. Scientifically speaking. Unless you want to claim that all observations are exclusive to the globe?

@AntiDisinfo86 @space_audits @PiezoAetheric It's right there Shane. The measurements to the celestial bodies. Those measurements are from a globe. It takes less than 5 minutes to dismantle your model. Want me to also show your angular measurements to the sun are wrong as well? That will be fun.

@DigitallyForged is this a picture of you finding the globe in my model? 😂😂 try showing the public code using the constants you claimed were in there first. Show the code or sit down @space_audits @PiezoAetheric Check this out lads, he got us!

@AntiDisinfo86 It's right there Shane. Those angular measurements to the celestial bodies only work if you are standing on a sphere. You also lied about only seeing half a sphere in the sky. You see more than half.

@AntiDisinfo86 Your Tiktok video....me in the comments. You running off as usual.

@DigitallyForged LOL So you claimed I used the globe but cannot show it or demonstrate it in any way. your only conclusion is that because it shows real observations I must have used the globe. And I have no idea who that is on tik ok.