Digs🇵🇹

10.6K posts

Digs🇵🇹 banner
Digs🇵🇹

Digs🇵🇹

@DigsLFC

🇵🇹 • @LFC • @FCPorto

Katılım Ocak 2024
640 Takip Edilen360 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Digs🇵🇹
Digs🇵🇹@DigsLFC·
Jesus Christ is King ✝️
English
0
0
2
338
Melchisedek Saanou
Melchisedek Saanou@MelchisedekSaa1·
@DigsLFC @PSGINT_ Try to reason...it's simply because Liverpool didn't face them. Otherwise, Bayern Munich would have thrashed them.
English
1
0
0
67
Bayern Space
Bayern Space@BayernSpace·
It is with great pleasure that I can confirm, after months of investigation, that what I first reported back in August remains unchanged, Michael Olise has a release clause, with Liverpool, in the persons of Michael Edwards and Richard Hughes, not only fully aware of the situation but directly and repeatedly informed, both formally and verbally, through multiple conversations with Michael’s representatives. Those exchanges were not exploratory, they were concrete, with Michael’s representatives receiving clear indications from Liverpool that the outlined parameters in Michael’s contract align with their financial framework and, crucially, with the paradox structure of the clause itself. Liverpool are fully aware of the structure and have already signalled to Michael Olise’s representatives that they can operate within those parameters, as the clause differs fundamentally from the traditional fixed-figure clauses often seen in contracts. Release clauses differ in how they are structured and presented, and the absence of a clearly defined number does not mean that no release clause effectively exists. The agreement is built on precise language, formal paragraphs, and clearly defined verbal and written commitments, leaving no ambiguity that the player can leave once a certain financial threshold is met, meaning the structure functions in practice as a release mechanism even without a formally stated figure. The framework allows Bayern to maintain their public stance and repeatedly insist that no release clause exists, while internally the contractual reality points in a different direction, one in which obligations and guarantees are already embedded to facilitate a transfer under specific conditions. Structures like this are not uncommon in modern football, as they offer advantages from a financial planning perspective, allowing clubs to avoid anchoring a fixed asset value on the books, maintain flexibility in amortization strategies, and in certain cases navigate accounting or tax-related considerations more efficiently, all while still having a predefined exit pathway in place. This aligns with the heavy interest from Liverpool, who, as first reported by me in August, internally view Michael Olise as a long-term successor to Mohamed Salah, and with his departure now confirmed for the end of the season, the situation is shifting from long-term planning into an imminent phase. In the coming weeks and months, Bayern board members will continue to speak about hope, about the belief they expect Michael to have in the project, about trust in his commitment, and about what he has at Bayern, messaging that begins to collapse when set against their public stance that no release clause exists, because if there truly were no clause, there would be nothing to hope for and no need for these statements, he would simply be tied to the club for the duration of his contract. The contradiction is not accidental, the contract itself creates the space for this public posture, allowing them to maintain one narrative externally while fully understanding internally that the mechanism for a departure is already embedded, which is why these statements are viewed internally as pressure, aimed at influencing Michael’s decision and discouraging him from making use of the clauses already written into the contract. It must be stated again that no fixed amount is formally defined within the contract, yet the structure follows a clear logic and is explicitly written into the agreement and assured to his representatives, broadly aligned around a multiple, effectively in the region of roughly 2.5 times the transfer fee originally paid for the player. This creates a flexible but defined benchmark, avoids publicly anchoring a price, and still provides both clarity and direction within negotiations, while also offering advantages from a financial and tax perspective by not fixing a public valuation, which in turn allows Bayern to repeatedly go public with the claim that no release clause exists, even though the mechanism is clear, the pathway is defined, and the clause, whether traditional or not, is embedded within the contract.
English
279
401
4K
617K
Yazz LFC
Yazz LFC@YazzLFC·
DO NOT question my loyalty to this club ... EVER!!! Half of you don't know this feeling 😤
Yazz LFC tweet media
English
328
353
2.5K
620.7K
uncle.stan_
uncle.stan_@uncl3_stan·
if your favourite dave song is raindance, please stay at home
English
17
156
693
23.9K
Vusi.Mz🦉
Vusi.Mz🦉@YouDunnoVusi·
Who even listens to Dave
English
109
87
638
84.1K
Yazz LFC
Yazz LFC@YazzLFC·
Serious Question : Would YOU cash in on Florian Wirtz this summer for a solid fee, or keep him for another season to let him develop further knowing there’s a risk his resale value could drop later? Personally? I’d give him next season ideally under the right coach 🙏
Yazz LFC tweet media
English
416
8
234
70.8K
SANTAN
SANTAN@Santandave1·
The first shows on the African Leg of my tour are in South Africa!!!!! Tickets on general sale this Friday 27th March at 9am local time. santandave.com/tour/
SANTAN tweet media
English
354
1.5K
9.2K
454.6K