Nick Delliskave

@JQuigster Wait until people realize the guy saying this with a straight face is the same one everyone thinks will fix organized play for the next season.

This is, frankly speaking, tone deaf and pretty unacceptable. The LCQ format is brutal, but promos for each win in 2025 made it feel OK. Don't know what the prize wall will look like. Regardless, going 5-0, losing, and having nothing else to show for it is awful. #Lorcana

@NicolasBeland11 @LorcanaGoons They’ve also proven they can handle 4k person events like they did at Ghent. With different event companies in each reason there’s 0 reason we can’t have 3x the amount of events.

Wow ! A full 345 peaple at dlc taiwan ! And asia has what , 4 dlc this year ? Alll under 500 peaple. Meanwhile. NA has 3. And canada 0 . ( witch could have been 2k peaple ) Really hope you do better next years . Cause there is a lot of new games already doing better #lorcana

@SaffronOlive This was at the Hunter Burton memorial, something about him getting salty and calling his female opponent the C word and a few guys stepped in and he decided it was go time.

Lol, what?!?!

@ClownWorld Probably a fake sticker from the owner to punish people like me that only put in a gallon so we can reach the nearest Costco and get it cheaper 😂

First time seeing a gas pump with a 4 gallon minimum.

@LorcanaGoons I was thinking about a format banning the top X cards in each color, but that prevents seeing what would be good if XYZ didn’t exist. I think the best way is a custom ban list (no tramp, Elsa, Genie.) You could also try a “future league” that’s post rotation sets only.

If you were to attend a “non meta” lorcana weekly league, how would you prefer to go about the format? Ban specific cards? Limit how many of each rarity ? Ideally we’d like to stay away from banning entire color combos as that does not = exact deck Ideas are appreciated!

@TFMDan_Lorcana @TFM_Lorcana @lizardkitty3 @AlexHansenTCG Where’s Dick Burns? I haven’t seen him in awhile.

Been a few months since we have done a live podcast tonight I’ll be live with @lizardkitty3 and @AlexHansenTCG (maybe a DLC Champion as well) Lots of topics to discuss! Come hang out as cover DLC Ghent! @TFM_Lorcana

@EpicSwitzer I am curious how not wanting a cheater in the game is virtue signaling? I think it’s asking a lot for the community to police cheaters on their own. Like you said 99% of his opponents probably assume he has good intentions and they will get taken advantage of.

Day 3 of well-meaning Lorcana players tweeting righteous indignation about a suspected cheater 99% of us don't know and will never play with. We get it, cheating is bad. Are we virtue signaling a little too hard maybe?

@Fungus317 Do they work if I want to double sleeve or no?

Hey guys, I had a really good experience with Duel Spec sleeves so far. I just ordered 10 packs of the DuelSpec Pro. They have been the best feeling most resilient sleeves I have used in a while, so I recommend trying them out. They fit really snug on the Pros without needing to double sleeve which I appreciate. If you end up checking them out, I have a referral link which gives a discount and gives me some commission. Use code Fungus at checkout for 10% off. duelspec.com/?ref=Fungus

@Cre8tcg Is it possible the deck is good without Jasmine? I won a set champs and top 8d a $1k without her, then I decided to try her and went 0/3. She put all of my removal to the bottom of my deck, and the cards she does draw don’t help, you end up using Pete to try to find answers .

This is the Blue Steel Ally (Jastin) build I used this past weekend that got me a top 16+top 8 placement in the CCS 25K+5K. I also earned 65 points for the 50k invitational which should put me around one of the top 15 spots on the leaderboard. Turn 2 shift jasmine is everything.

@JdzQuest Nothing needs to be banned. Look at the decks from the weekend, they weren’t teching for dogs, they were teching for mirrors. No one played item removal or “cards only good against dogs.” If I had a card that said “I win against 22% of the field.” I’d play it.

If you think they would or should ban the key piece of the first and probably only meta relevant Franchise pure deck I’m sorry but you’re mistaken. Dogs NEED the full court press similar to peak Diablo. It’s the best deck let’s treat it as such!

@WoahChuck01_ I’d bet literal money no bans and they wait for rotation.

I'd be absolutely shocked if we dont see bans after this DLC. I don't think it can be Tramp, because then Dogs doesn't exist and Blurple becomes unbeatable. I don't think it will be Tramp + Purple thing because then GB. I dont think Tramp + Purple + Sail So I'm guessing UTS

@TarisBlvck @BradenMTG I like the enthusiasm, I think you should challenge DKP to a pixelborn match. Only way to ensure we’re dealing with two competent players.

@Direwire @BradenMTG If you’re losing to BP with RP you’re one playing the wrong list & two not played enough with the right list

Yeah this is my tier list

@LorcanaGoons How many cards from a franchise does a deck need to be considered “movie themed?”

Main reason why I’m glad Dogs is tier 0 is because it’s the first movie themed meta deck we actually have in Lorcana and I would like to keep this precedent going

@Cre8tcg @lorcana_s4iler Nothing needs a nerf, except maybe S4iler 😂

@lorcana_s4iler What would be a balance nerf to dogs? I was thinking an errata to tramp 7c that would only allow one Tramp 7c to be played a turn. Since people do not like bans. I’ve said to hit daisy, this doesn’t effect the main stratgery but allows breathing room for a lot of decks.

I may have the biggest argument for switching to the control version of Dogs: Willow is sail Nani is tala Tramp2 is Maui Tramp7 is vision (and more 😆) UTS is Big Sisu Rhino is Ice block Della is Coil Bobby is Pawpsicles Lady5 is Tamatoas Gogo is Dime Who’s on board? ;)

@SaffronOlive Why do we need common main characters? I think a “common” character doesn’t fit, neither does making a bad version of that character that’s nonlegendary just to be able to have a common version. Characters should feel important.

Curious what you all think about this? I'm very much team Mark/Aaron. The current legend rule is really bad with 2026 era design, especially with UB sets, but in general. If you *have* to make common versions of name characters, they don't need to be legendary. I also think the arguments from R&D is pretty lackluster. 1.) Overall it doesn't feel like legends are more powerful than non-legends (and legends just shouldn't exist at common period, outside of very rare cases like the at the time unique legend theme of original Kamigawa). 2.) The system working very well for in-universe sets doesn't mean much when more than half of sets are Universes Beyond. 3.) The legend rule has changed several times over the years, mostly for the better, and people figured it out. I don't think the cost is that high. Give Magic players some credit R&D... I think the costs to basically every non-Commander format of making so many legends is higher than trying to solve the problem.

@LorcanaGoons What’s interesting is they finally got rid of them and a good portion of the community is like “where are the starter decks?”

I can only imagine how hyped ravensburger was post fist chapter investor bro craze only for them to realize 2yrs later that these type starter decks are actually not good for the true fans/ community members

@HeezyGame Can we also rag on “random no name player who top 32d an event and is now selling a guide?”

Me: I really hate the stifle of innovation once a deck is created Random MTG Player: Look at my version of this deck that is 3 cards off the most recent challenge win and every change is worse! BUY MY GUIDE

@ego_dre We had someone who had to get their display name changed in RPH. It was Michael_Vic because his deck beats dogs.

LOOK WHAT THIS DUDE NAMED HIS DECK AT THE TOURNEY THIS WEEKEND LMAOOOOO I HATE MY FRIENDS

@EpicSwitzer I think it’s related to consumer confidence because of rotation. Why would I spend thousands to bling out my deck and not be able to use it for 90% of events in a year? I still foil out my collection with normal foils, but that’s because its harder to start over at this point.

@Direwire It's not about these specific enchanteds. Here's Shimmering Skies

Not too put too fine a point on this, but here's a big Amazon sale on Azurite Sea next to the 3 most valuable cards from the set. A year-old box currently still in core and it's worthless. The math ain't mathing