Dogecoin

DuGs = Dogecoin User Groups, Find your pack 🐾

The dogecoin blockchain processed 4,410 transactions in the time it took you to listen to this song

peptide bros won't touch doge but will inject something Kyle sent them on telegram... makes sense

sound it out slowly:

@dogecoin I have an awesome Doge x @Slash shirt that I bought with Dogecoin from @GoDogeArmy 😄🎸

show off ur coolest Doge merch, most absurd one gets a repost

@adidasfootball unbiased, Japan best one

home jerseys that fit the whole team 🐾

Dogs get the zoomies. @Zumiez should get the Dog coin. You know where to find us if you want to make this happen

The suit told you crypto was stupid right before he lost your 401k... just sayin

Do Only Good Everyday and help some good doggos with your $DOGE

So Intern, Much Beta, Very MyDoge 👀

What is the best underdog movie?

Banks charge you $35 for overdrafting by $2. Doge charges you nothing. One of these is a joke and it's not the dog

Normies: How bullish are you on dogecoin? Shibes:

hey @PetSmart, you sell dog food but won't accept dog money? This is not the smart pet behavior your name promised.

dogecoin lore - unlike bitcoin's fixed rewards for solving a block, dogecoin started with random rewards (between 1-1m) cuz i thought it’d be funny turns out you could figure out the next block reward and miners wouldn’t mine lower rewards so we had to remove the randomness 😭

Fun fact: Because Dogecoin mints a fixed amount each year, the inflation rate falls over time: about 3.6% now and heading towards 3.1%

imagine losing to a meme in both brand recognition and payment usefulness

Much better

First question many people will have is, how does this signature secure the transaction. Well, right now - it doesn't. But remember that the entire premise of distributed ledgers like Dogecoin is consensus. Think about it in the other direction. Someone could build a Dogecoin client that accepted spends without any of the present-day cryptographic checks as well - but transactions made by that variety of client wouldn't be accepted by the majority of the network (lack of consensus), and would not be valid. The same goes for a PQC signature; essentially it would be a UASF where the majority of the nodes on the network decided that a valid signature like this must check out before a transaction is accepted as valid. It wouldn't require an overhaul; just agreement on the majority of the network that the post-quantum signature attached to the transaction has to be valid for the transaction to be valid. If Falcon-512 works as it should, that portion could not be spoofed, cracked, or manipulated by quantum systems; the PQC shared/consensus proof validation would not pass. Not saying this is the final answer, but that work is ongoing.