hapka
444 posts


570 million people trust Tether. Now, we’re putting that global infrastructure directly into your hands. 🌐 Meet Tether Wallet: the fully self-custodial app designed for everyday life.
▪️Universal: 💸 USD₮, USA₮, XAU₮, & Bitcoin (On-chain + Lightning⚡).
▪️Simple: Send to @tether.me username with 1 QR code across all networks.
▪️ Secure: You own your keys, safely backed up to your cloud.
The People’s Wallet is officially live.
Download it now: tether.me
English
hapka retweetledi

One of my biggest disappointments is $TWT
Instead of using its 200M users to support price stability and push the wallet space to the next level, CZ chose the usual Binance playbook bleed the token out.
For context: the wallet generates $5–6M per month in fees alone.
To push the price to $10, it would’ve taken just a couple of tweets.
But looks like CZ needed the cash instead.
What a scam!


English
hapka retweetledi

Today I'm slashing @TrustWallet
Trust heavily shilled TWT near the highs, promised token value through its Sept 2025 roadmap, then delivered basically nothing
Since Nov 2025, not a single real project. Then came another Trust Wallet extension exploit in Dec 2025, which led to user losses of over $8M
Now TWT is down almost 30% in 2 days while the broader market is moving sideways, and the new CEO stays completely silent. No roadmap updates, no explanation, no accountability
And after all that, they quietly removed TWT from their X banner and bio
As someone who supported the project, believed in it, and invested in it, I was left alone with questions, just like the rest of the community
If you, like me, think this is unacceptable, vote “Slash”:
app.ethos.network/activity/slash…

Sychev Pavel@pavlitosy4
Maybe it’s time to respond to the community? What’s going on with $TWT? What about the roadmap? The longer you stay silent, the more anger you’re building in the community. @felix_fan @TrustWallet @cz_binance #TWT #TrustWallet x.com/pavlitosy4/sta…
English
hapka retweetledi

Dear @cz_binance,
I am reaching out to you on behalf of myself (Binance KOL Award 2022 CIS), @toptraders0x (Binance KOL Award 2022 CEE), and our entire large TW community.
Since 2019, as leading influencers, we have acted as reliable partners and actively supported @TrustWallet. We collected a massive amount of user feedback, defended the project’s reputation during its most critical moments (including the hacks), and have always stood by your side.
However, the current trajectory of the project causes us deep concern. Our community feels disoriented, and as opinion leaders, we can no longer ignore this.
Unfortunately, the new CEO @felix_fan has completely failed to establish the connection and level of trust with the community that @vikmeup and @EowynChen carefully built over 7 years. We see a total lack of dialogue.
Previously announced plans and commitments to the audience are being ignored, and communication has been reduced to zero. Is this the "new strategy" you spoke about at the end of 2025?
Where is the promised integration of the $TWT token’s utility and the execution of the 2026 Roadmap according to the Litepaper that was so actively promoted?
Why have all mentions of $TWT dropped to zero since the New Year, and why has the team started ignoring any questions regarding this topic? What exactly happened?
Instead of providing clarity, the new CEO @felix_fan simply blocked the @toptraders0x account on Telegram just to avoid answering uncomfortable questions.
The project urgently needs a return to transparency. If the current leadership is unwilling or unable to maintain an open dialogue with its community, we respectfully ask for your intervention. We need your guidance and help to get Trust Wallet back on the right path, before years of hard work by the entire community are undone.
The community deserves clarity. We care deeply about Trust Wallet, which is why we need answers, CZ.
As a first step to rebuilding trust, we officially propose hosting an open AMA session between the Trust Wallet leadership and the community within the next 7 days.
#TrustWallet #TWT $TWT @heyibinance



English
hapka retweetledi

@pavlitosy4 @felix_fan @TrustWallet @cz_binance All dead. Bald scammer got investors money, $TWT no more interested quite some time.
“Chen resign rugpull” was latest good bye. Innocent froggy/CEO/intern just look blankly, speechless
Thank to the shameless bald scammer for the everything.
He teach giggle academy how to rugpull
English
hapka retweetledi

Despite this:
• Your Trust Moon accelerator is abandoned.
• Since the announcement of Trust Alpha, 0 projects have been released.
• The mention of $TWT has disappeared from your Twitter. What happened to "TWT is Fuel"?
• The support level that held $TWT since 2021 is broken.
• The CEO is in full ignore mode. People aren't asking for specifics, just for some basic clarity.
• In your Discord, the community is getting banned for asking questions about $TWT.
And it’s left to a Trust Wallet engineer to actually answer the community’s questions 🫠
English
hapka retweetledi

$TWT (Trust Wallet) dropped −20% in an hour
Breakdown triggered long liquidations and panic on the market.
No clear fundamentals behind it:
∙ no hack
∙ no statements from @TrustWallet or @binance
Last major incident was the Dec 2025 extension exploit, when @cz_binance said losses would be covered & price recovered quickly.

English

A note on TWT:
Building in crypto means navigating a tension most projects won't admit exists: between what you want to say and what you're legally permitted to say about tokens.
The facts haven't changed: the roadmap is being executed, development is active, and the product has 220M downloads with over $1B in monthly swap volume.
We're going to keep the community updated within the lines we operate in. When we speak, it'll be substance.
Keep building ⚒️
English

Saw some people panicking or asking about quantum computing's impact on crypto.
At a high level, all crypto has to do is to upgrade to Quantum-Resistant (Post-Quantum) Algorithms. So, no need to panic. 😂
In practice, there are some execution considerations. It's hard to organize upgrades in a decentralized world. There will likely be many debates on which algorithm(s) to use, resulting in some forks.
And some dead project may not upgrade at all. Might be a good to cleanse out those projects anyway.
New code may introduce other bugs or security issues in the short term.
People who self custody will have to migrate their coins to new wallets.
This brings to the question of Satoshi's bitcoins. If those coins move, then it means he/she is still around, which is interesting to know. If they don't move (in a certain period of time), it might be better to lock (or effectively burn) those addresses so that they don't go to the first hacker who cracks it. There is also the difficulty of identifying all his addresses, and not confuse with some old hodlers. Anyway, it's a different topic for later.
Fundamentally:
It's always easier to encrypt than decrypt.
More computing power is always good.
Crypto will stay, post quantum.
English

🚨 Altseason 3.0 Updated Alpha List 🚀 – March 30, 2026 Edition (speculative targets, vibes only)
$SOL $150–600
$AVAX $40–120
$LINK $20–80
$ONDO $3–15
$NEAR $15–60
$SUI $6–30
$RENDER $5–40
$TAO $500–3000+
$CORE $4–20
$HYPE $30–200
$MNT $4–20
$ETH $3000–10000
$BNB $600–2000
$XRP $2–8
$ADA $1.5–6
$DOT $20–80
$ARB $3–12
$OP $6–20
$INJ $50–200
$PEPE $0.00003–0.0003
$SHIB $0.00003–0.0002
$TON $20–80
$APT $30–100
$SEI $1.5–10
$FET $5–30
$AAVE $300–1000
$UNI $30–100
$MKR $4000–12000
$JUP $3–15
🔥 NEW ADDS (trending heat right now):
$KAS $0.3–3
$CFG $1–10 (RWA revenue machine)
$FIL $10–50
⚫ REMOVED: Older/less momentum plays ( $GALA, $IMX, $SUPRA, $PENGU, $PROPC, $PI, $DEFI, $WLD, $ZRO) to keep the list fresh with current market rotation vibes.
What are you stacking heavy?
Drop your picks or wildcards 👇
Who’s catching the next wave? (vibes only, NFA, DYOR)
Let’s ride the updated wave fam 🚀🔥 #Altseason #Crypto #BNB #BTC
English

Ethereum Foundation scales CROPS.
Solana Foundation scales applications.
Choose your side.
vibhu@vibhu
P*rn scaled the internet. Games scaled mobile phones. Memecoins scaled crypto.
English

@felix_fan -75% $TWT from October
Which funds SAFU Felix?
Not our.
English

There have recently been some discussions on the ongoing role of L2s in the Ethereum ecosystem, especially in the face of two facts:
* L2s' progress to stage 2 (and, secondarily, on interop) has been far slower and more difficult than originally expected
* L1 itself is scaling, fees are very low, and gaslimits are projected to increase greatly in 2026
Both of these facts, for their own separate reasons, mean that the original vision of L2s and their role in Ethereum no longer makes sense, and we need a new path.
First, let us recap the original vision. Ethereum needs to scale. The definition of "Ethereum scaling" is the existence of large quantities of block space that is backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum - that is, block space where, if you do things (including with ETH) inside that block space, your activities are guaranteed to be valid, uncensored, unreverted, untouched, as long as Ethereum itself functions. If you create a 10000 TPS EVM where its connection to L1 is mediated by a multisig bridge, then you are not scaling Ethereum.
This vision no longer makes sense. L1 does not need L2s to be "branded shards", because L1 is itself scaling. And L2s are not able or willing to satisfy the properties that a true "branded shard" would require. I've even seen at least one explicitly saying that they may never want to go beyond stage 1, not just for technical reasons around ZK-EVM safety, but also because their customers' regulatory needs require them to have ultimate control. This may be doing the right thing for your customers. But it should be obvious that if you are doing this, then you are not "scaling Ethereum" in the sense meant by the rollup-centric roadmap. But that's fine! it's fine because Ethereum itself is now scaling directly on L1, with large planned increases to its gas limit this year and the years ahead.
We should stop thinking about L2s as literally being "branded shards" of Ethereum, with the social status and responsibilities that this entails. Instead, we can think of L2s as being a full spectrum, which includes both chains backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum with various unique properties (eg. not just EVM), as well as a whole array of options at different levels of connection to Ethereum, that each person (or bot) is free to care about or not care about depending on their needs.
What would I do today if I were an L2?
* Identify a value add other than "scaling". Examples: (i) non-EVM specialized features/VMs around privacy, (ii) efficiency specialized around a particular application, (iii) truly extreme levels of scaling that even a greatly expanded L1 will not do, (iv) a totally different design for non-financial applications, eg. social, identity, AI, (v) ultra-low-latency and other sequencing properties, (vi) maybe built-in oracles or decentralized dispute resolution or other "non-computationally-verifiable" features
* Be stage 1 at the minimum (otherwise you really are just a separate L1 with a bridge, and you should just call yourself that) if you're doing things with ETH or other ethereum-issued assets
* Support maximum interoperability with Ethereum, though this will differ for each one (eg. what if you're not EVM, or even not financial?)
From Ethereum's side, over the past few months I've become more convinced of the value of the native rollup precompile, particuarly once we have enshrined ZK-EVM proofs that we need anyway to scale L1. This is a precompile that verifies a ZK-EVM proof, and it's "part of Ethereum", so (i) it auto-upgrades along with Ethereum, and (ii) if the precompile has a bug, Ethereum will hard-fork to fix the bug.
The native rollup precompile would make full, security-council-free, EVM verification accessible. We should spend much more time working out how to design it in such a way that if your L2 is "EVM plus other stuff", then the native rollup precompile would verify the EVM, and you only have to bring your own prover for the "other stuff" (eg. Stylus). This might involve a canonical way of exposing a lookup table between contract call inputs and outputs, and letting you provide your own values to the lookup table (that you would prove separately).
This would make it easy to have safe, strong, trustless interoperability with Ethereum. It also enables synchronous composability (see: ethresear.ch/t/combining-pr… and ethresear.ch/t/synchronous-… ). And from there, it's each L2's choice exactly what they want to build. Don't just "extend L1", figure out something new to add.
This of course means that some will add things that are trust-dependent, or backdoored, or otherwise insecure; this is unavoidable in a permissionless ecosystem where developers have freedom. Our job should make to make it clear to users what guarantees they have, and to build up the strongest Ethereum that we can.
English
hapka retweetledi

@VitalikButerin To understand this, you first had to spend a long time working on the Fusuka update, which is aimed at scaling using L2, launch it a month ago, and then today make completely opposite statements about the role of L2 and its future in the Ethereum network? How rotten you all are.
English
hapka retweetledi

CZ wants you to believe that the opinions of small accounts voicing their frustrations about Binance don't really matter because they don't have a following.
Well, let's see what happens if the majority of the small accounts on Binance get deleted.
I convinced over 20 friends to delete their Binance accounts this week, and i'm not stopping until there's no one in my circle that trades on this exchange.

English


