Domain Hubs

209 posts

Domain Hubs

Domain Hubs

@DomainHubs

I am a domain player and have sold thousands of domain names. I want to meet more friends here. Contact email: [email protected]

Katılım Şubat 2026
485 Takip Edilen62 Takipçiler
Domain Hubs
Domain Hubs@DomainHubs·
teamclaw.com,This is a domain name that represents collective wisdom. If the previous buyer missed it, that is the buyer's loss. Now, it belongs only to those who have ideals. Access to purchase.
Domain Hubs tweet media
English
3
2
35
1K
GeniusThinking
GeniusThinking@GeniusGTX·
Andrej Karpathy just mass-shifted his entire AI workflow. Less code. More knowledge. The man who taught the world to build neural networks is now using LLMs to build something nobody expected. This is where it stops being a tech story. Karpathy says a large fraction of his recent token throughput is going less into manipulating code and more into manipulating knowledge. Building personal knowledge bases for various topics of research interest. Think about what that means: One of the most capable engineers alive is choosing to use AI not to write better software. He is using it to think better. The shift is subtle but the implications are enormous. For years, the AI conversation has been about automation. Replace the coder. Replace the designer. Replace the writer. Karpathy is pointing somewhere different entirely. The next phase of AI is not about replacing human work. It is about augmenting human understanding. Using LLMs as thinking partners, not task executors. When the person who literally built the training infrastructure for Tesla's self-driving AI tells you the real value of LLMs is knowledge organization, not code generation, that is a signal worth reading carefully. The tools are the same. The use case just changed. That's a wrap. @GeniusGTX is a gallery for the greatest minds in economics, psychology, and history. Follow if that interests you. We are ONE genius away.
Andrej Karpathy@karpathy

LLM Knowledge Bases Something I'm finding very useful recently: using LLMs to build personal knowledge bases for various topics of research interest. In this way, a large fraction of my recent token throughput is going less into manipulating code, and more into manipulating knowledge (stored as markdown and images). The latest LLMs are quite good at it. So: Data ingest: I index source documents (articles, papers, repos, datasets, images, etc.) into a raw/ directory, then I use an LLM to incrementally "compile" a wiki, which is just a collection of .md files in a directory structure. The wiki includes summaries of all the data in raw/, backlinks, and then it categorizes data into concepts, writes articles for them, and links them all. To convert web articles into .md files I like to use the Obsidian Web Clipper extension, and then I also use a hotkey to download all the related images to local so that my LLM can easily reference them. IDE: I use Obsidian as the IDE "frontend" where I can view the raw data, the the compiled wiki, and the derived visualizations. Important to note that the LLM writes and maintains all of the data of the wiki, I rarely touch it directly. I've played with a few Obsidian plugins to render and view data in other ways (e.g. Marp for slides). Q&A: Where things get interesting is that once your wiki is big enough (e.g. mine on some recent research is ~100 articles and ~400K words), you can ask your LLM agent all kinds of complex questions against the wiki, and it will go off, research the answers, etc. I thought I had to reach for fancy RAG, but the LLM has been pretty good about auto-maintaining index files and brief summaries of all the documents and it reads all the important related data fairly easily at this ~small scale. Output: Instead of getting answers in text/terminal, I like to have it render markdown files for me, or slide shows (Marp format), or matplotlib images, all of which I then view again in Obsidian. You can imagine many other visual output formats depending on the query. Often, I end up "filing" the outputs back into the wiki to enhance it for further queries. So my own explorations and queries always "add up" in the knowledge base. Linting: I've run some LLM "health checks" over the wiki to e.g. find inconsistent data, impute missing data (with web searchers), find interesting connections for new article candidates, etc., to incrementally clean up the wiki and enhance its overall data integrity. The LLMs are quite good at suggesting further questions to ask and look into. Extra tools: I find myself developing additional tools to process the data, e.g. I vibe coded a small and naive search engine over the wiki, which I both use directly (in a web ui), but more often I want to hand it off to an LLM via CLI as a tool for larger queries. Further explorations: As the repo grows, the natural desire is to also think about synthetic data generation + finetuning to have your LLM "know" the data in its weights instead of just context windows. TLDR: raw data from a given number of sources is collected, then compiled by an LLM into a .md wiki, then operated on by various CLIs by the LLM to do Q&A and to incrementally enhance the wiki, and all of it viewable in Obsidian. You rarely ever write or edit the wiki manually, it's the domain of the LLM. I think there is room here for an incredible new product instead of a hacky collection of scripts.

English
10
12
123
38K
Domain Hubs retweetledi
Joe Zhou
Joe Zhou@joezhoublack·
Crypto,正在悄悄发生一场巨大的突变——甚至连这个词本身的定义,都在被重新改写。 和富途董事总经理 Steve 深聊了两次之后,我越来越强烈地感受到一道巨大的认知鸿沟:在券商巨头眼中的 Crypto,和币圈人眼中的 Crypto,早就不是同一个东西了。 Steve 在接受采访时给了一个大胆的判断:“加密资产(Crypto),是唯一一个在未来极有可能与美股并驾齐驱、甚至实现反超的全球性资产。” 我当时的第一反应是:这是不是有点夸张了?但后来我意识到——并不是。问题不在于这个判断是否激进,而在于:我们彼此谈论的“Crypto”,其实根本不在同一个维度。 在很多币圈人的语境里,Crypto 依然等同CoinMarketCap 上市值前 100 的代币,以及一轮又一轮潮起潮落、割完就跑的山寨币。 但在香港券商、华尔街机构的视角中,完全不是这样。在他们眼里,Crypto 从来不是某一种具体的资产类别,而是一种“底层结算形态”。 甚至可以说:未来的美股,本身也会成为 Crypto 的一部分。 更有意思的是,这种认知突变并不只发生在传统金融圈。实际上,包括 Binance、Bybit、Bitget 在内的头部交易所管理层,早在 2025 年年底就已经在内部完成了类似的认知切换。而大洋彼岸的贝莱德、纽交所、纳斯达克乃至 Robinhood,也早已按照这个剧本落子。 这也是为什么有人隐约感觉到:山寨币的狂欢正在走向终结,而 Crypto 本身却在迎来重生。 只是大多数币圈参与者,还被困在过去的叙事残影里——仍然把 Crypto 狭隘地理解为 2017 到 2024 年之间,那些反复轮动的代币炒作周期。 也正因如此,Steve 的那句话才显得不仅不夸张,甚至是对未来最克制的描述:Crypto,确实可能成为唯一一个超越美股的全球资产。 关键在于——他所说的 Crypto,已经不再是“发币”,而是“资产的重构方式”。 我们可以看一组更现实的流血对比: 富途,作为中国最大的互联网券商之一,2025 年的交易量达到 14.68 万亿港元。 而同一年,香港头部持牌交易所 HashKey 公布的全年交易量约为 5908 亿港元。 看起来,两者之间仍然隔着令人绝望的数量级差距。但别忘了,HashKey 的这个体量,是建立在一系列“严苛枷锁”之上的: 1、可交易币种极少 2、没有杠杆 3、没有永续合约 4、不能直接交易股票 5、几乎没有 RWA(真实世界资产) 6、缺乏更复杂的结构化金融衍生品 换句话说,这只是一个被“阉割版”的 Crypto 市场。而上面提到的每一道枷锁,一旦在监管的默许下被逐步撕开,都会让整个合规市场的资金体量,向上爆发式地跃迁一个台阶。 真正的巨变其实已经开始了,在华尔街、在香港、在很多国家对稳定币的政策的改变上,只是它发生得极其安静。 Crypto 正在重生。它的定义正在被这群“老钱”深刻改写,但也因此变得前所未有的扎实。它不再只是在链上空转的代币泡沫,而是: 1、美股与美债的代币化(Tokenization) 2、各类现实资产(RWA)的无摩擦上链 3、稳定币构建的“新美元霸权体系” 4、一整套7x24小时运转的全新金融基础设施。 过去的 Crypto,是一个“市场”;而现在的 Crypto,正在变成一个更大的、逐渐覆盖整个传统金融的“系统”。 (图片:2026年3月27日,OKX官方表示:OKX 合约已向中国区用户开放股票及大宗商品交易入口,其中股票约包含 27 种资产)
Joe Zhou tweet media
Joe Zhou@joezhoublack

x.com/i/article/2037…

中文
51
115
492
150.2K
Domain Hubs retweetledi
Ejaaz
Ejaaz@cryptopunk7213·
holy shit Anthropic accidentally leaked a new AI model that’s “by far the most powerful AI model we’ve ever developed” it’s so good they’ve designated it a fucking cybersecurity threat 👀 this is nuts: - code name Capybara / Mythos - “dramatically higher scores that opus 4.6 on software coding, reasoning and cyber security” - wildest shit: “capybara is currently far ahead of any other AI model in cyber capabilities” - so they have to SLOW RELEASE it to cyber experts FIRST so they can prevent advanced hacks when they release it 😂 anthropic admitting it’s a cyber security weapon so need to pump the breaks - model is an entire tier ABOVE opus and sonnet. the rollout is being throttled because the models too damn good NOW i understand why they’ve been constrained on compute - they’ve been training this fucking thing
Ejaaz tweet mediaEjaaz tweet media
M1@M1Astra

Claude Mythos Blog Post Saved before it was taken down. m1astra-mythos.pages.dev

English
51
41
623
167.4K
Domain Hubs retweetledi
Chrys Bader
Chrys Bader@chrysb·
openclaw ecosystem market report, march 15th: @openclaw dropped from 100% to 69% market share between jan and mar 1. since then it's drifted slightly to 67.6%. but the drift is deceptive. @openclaw added 72k stars in the last 2 weeks. everyone else combined added 38k. openclaw is accelerating in absolute terms, but so is the competition: 1️⃣ hermes is the breakout (@NousResearch). v0.2.0 dropped mar 12 and stars nearly doubled in 3 days. +228% in the last week, 28 daily contributors, 263 commits in a single day. accelerating, not cooling. 2️⃣ ironclaw was the breakout two weeks ago (+155% mar 1-15) but is now decelerating. +33% last week vs +92% the week before. still growing, momentum has shifted. 3️⃣ @openfangg went from 1 star to 14.5k in under 3 weeks. cooling now but still the fastest entrance the ecosystem has seen. 4️⃣ @zeroclawlabs launch spike (1.2k to 16.4k in one week) has normalized. classic hype curve. 5️⃣ the long tail is dying. @TinyClawAI flatlined, nanoclaw and picoclaw decelerating. the ecosystem is consolidating around openclaw + 2-3 real challengers. zooming out: the total ecosystem hit 458k stars, up from near zero in late jan. but the growth rate peaked at ~13k stars/day around mar 8 and has dropped to ~3k/day this week. the initial wave that lifted everything is fading. beware the ides of march! source: clawcharts.com
Chrys Bader tweet media
English
51
51
454
58.8K
OpenFang
OpenFang@openfangg·
we started reviewing and accepting PRs from the community!!
OpenFang tweet media
English
16
12
77
5.2K
Mortile Domains
Mortile Domains@MortileDomains·
Which .ai domain you want to sell quickly? ASAP (Only .ai)
Mortile Domains tweet media
English
82
1
36
3.2K