Sabitlenmiş Tweet
D T W N T R
1.3K posts
D T W N T R
@Dotwinter
I'm from anywhere, but I'll be in Cuba tomorrow.
Katılım Mayıs 2011
372 Takip Edilen2.1K Takipçiler
Brilliant breakdown and analysis of the 'Manosphere' from @childrensociety - an important guide for parents and carers.
childrenssociety.org.uk/what-we-do/blo…
@louistheroux #manosphere
English
@neilgibbons I'm just relieved that having his names changed to other names will finally undo all the terrible harm he has done, to the crown. We need regal allyship - amplify the voices of the victims.
English
Weird that Andrew, who is a prince, isn't allowed to call himself Prince Andrew. But the king, who isn't a prince, is still Prince Charles
English
@lorelixenberg I use the 'What am I?...WHAT AMm IIIIIII?' from Attention Scum.
English
White smoke has been seen getting sucked back into the chimney — the conclave have changed their mind
English
@AWaifSoul Danger is the only thing that moves us around on the surface of the earth. I'm tempted to go full Stone-Buddha and sit safely, polishing the veneer. I'll only end up seeing the 3rd rail in the reflection, but you know - something to do.
English
Sometimes being earnest can be irresponsible.
Someone can be right and also incorrect.
3rd rails are only dangerous because we electrify them. They also enable movement that would otherwise be impossible.
The world we're dealing with is a veneer no matter how real it looks.
English
@UFO_Rabbit_Hole Lue's 'Imminent' may be 'Immanent', the Latin literally means 'remaining within'. I'd prefer trancendant, but we're all different. (Which is both the pleasure of and problem with being incarnate.)
English
Man, that was quick.
The message is clear—don’t believe your “lying eyes” and don’t ask questions. Even if those questions are legitimate and respectful.
My only regret is not speaking up sooner.
Kelly Chase@kellychasemedia
I like Chris’s attitude, but I’m not sure we should be saying “on to the next one.” At what point does it become OK to ask the obvious questions about exactly why and how this keeps happening? Because I have serious questions.
English
Anyone else always add "and I need to be loved"? Not just to this, to everything?
English
@seanonolennon @StellaPaulNY A necessary one - divided for the chance of union.
English
@StellaPaulNY I thought when he made us all speak different languages it was a punishment not a blessing. No?
English
I remember hearing about insects like ants being particularly vulnerable to disease because they are genetically so similar within a colony that they can all be wiped out by the same infection.
I think this is the same for culture. The reason we want distinct cultures of humans is because we need to see which ideas are more successful over time, like genes competing for fitness but in this case it’s memes (memetic).
We better hope we never get a true global mono culture because then we will be extremely vulnerable to infection by bad ideas on a planetary scale. Just like ants who all have the same genes, if we all have the same culture we won’t know when we’ve been infected by bad ideas, and by then it will be too late. A bad sub culture or set of ideas could infect the entire human race and bring us all down.
This is one way modern civilization could collapse. Call it memetic drift.
English
@oldfriend99 He's lying because he knows he can get away with it.
English
He's a movie actor he's seen the back of his goddamn head. So FUCKING sick of this guy's bullshit
DiscussingFilm@DiscussingFilm
Robert Pattinson when asked about what he would say to a clone of himself: “I think I spend most of my time talking to myself anyway… I don’t think I’d be very interested in what he’d have to say… what does the back of my head look like?”
English
@richardwoods I misunderstood Jean completely - the angle of his glasses arm (combined with my poor eyesight) gave me the impression he was exposing his tongue to our precious world. I've evoked him to the triangle, seems he's only partly diabolique.
English
@uapisa @ExoAcademian @rosscoulthart Exactly this, yes. Both 'brought down' and 'landed' worry me the same really.
English
While I really do appreciate John Blitch coming forward as part of the great work @rosscoulthart is doing in making these interviews available, some of Blitch's comments about abductions and the shooting down of craft are a little head-scratching. And while he distinguishes between the "friendly space brothers" and the beings conducting abductions, the evidence I've seen requires much more nuance than that.
While I do think we've been able to bring down some craft, I still don't think that puts us on anything like equal technological footing. They can manipulate spacetime. They can shape perception and memory. Is he really suggesting that, prior to now, technological inferiority justified the cover-up, whereas now the fact that we've sufficiently closed the gap means that the government can safely let the 80-year-long secret out?
And where do Grusch's accords fit in here? And is he suggesting the reason that Elizondo and Grusch, etc., are still alive, is *because* of that difference in the response equation? In other words, before now they would have been murdered as part of the ongoing cover-up, primarily because the government was worried about the fact that it couldn't help the people being abducted? Even if the government was concerned about mass panic and societal dissolution, something doesn't quite square here. 🤔#ufotwitter #ufoX
neandrewthal@disgustipated42
Dr. John Blitch thinks that the inability to protect people from the abduction phenomenon is the lynchpin to the secrecy around UFOs and that we now have the ability to protect some people from being taken Link to interview in comments Dr. Blitch -“What I want my government to admit to me is, sorry we were powerless. I don't think we're powerless anymore. You heard Dave Grusch’s testimony about, you interviewed him about the crash retrieval process. I know you've recently interviewed some other folks with direct personal experience, not just watching reports, the folks that have been involved in that. And what, what makes sense about that to me is that the reason why Dave is still alive and Lou is still alive and a lot of other whistleblowers are still alive, is I believe that we now do have the ability to protect some of us. We do have the ability to shoot out some of these craft and to interfere with this kidnapping abduction process. I consider it a universal right, of any being, any living species to be able to protect their children. So what makes total sense to me is a government that has kept it secret
English
@ExoAcademian @rosscoulthart I really mean that I think I had a blunter reaction! Which you articulated the gist of there, but with a bit more care than I would have.
English
@ExoAcademian @rosscoulthart Not you - sorry, I phrased that vaguely. I mean the sort of conflation in the interview between 'shooting' and 'inviting' down.
English