DrGravityX

45 posts

DrGravityX

DrGravityX

@DrGravityX

Philosopher,Writer,Mentor,Innovator & Independent Researcher. Founder of the SpaceFroot Brand & Existence Research Organizations

Katılım Aralık 2023
16 Takip Edilen2 Takipçiler
DrGravityX
DrGravityX@DrGravityX·
@cybercpu @nailath_vt (the exact policy page I linked) and for inauthentic/mass-produced content (the definition you quoted). Those are measurable, policy-level definitions. ur absolute claim that no such category exists is false. Provide evidence for your original two claims, or concede the error.
English
1
0
0
24
Nailath | Vtuber
Nailath | Vtuber@nailath_vt·
My newest conspiracy theory: Either Youtube's "inauthentic Content" Bot is faulty and to aggressive... OR Youtube is in financial trouble: - they reduce the requirements of partners from 1000 to 500 Subs. - they increase the amounts of Ad's. - they make content creators pay for their own Video promotion. - they add Youtube Premium to reduce Ads. - they use an aggressive Bot to cancel Partnerships to avoid paying Creators, because a bunch will just give up or have no way to appeal the decision to get earnings back. Tell me im wrong.
Nailath | Vtuber tweet media
English
98
75
681
68.8K
DrGravityX
DrGravityX@DrGravityX·
@cybercpu @nailath_vt “You claimed these two statements ‘don’t even fit into [the scientific method] category.’ That’s a universal negative. you’re saying there is no objective framework for either. But YouTube itself has an official operational definition for both ‘enhancing storytelling’
English
1
0
0
15
DrGravityX
DrGravityX@DrGravityX·
@cybercpu @nailath_vt "the only times i see that not being the case". exactly the point - it's what "you" saw and that's a biased sample. that's an overgeneralization error. your using what you "saw" and trying to generalize it. this is an error. but as you said it's your opinion so yea..
English
1
0
0
14
CyberCPU Tech
CyberCPU Tech@cybercpu·
Those are my opinions and the opinions of most people who complain about AI slop. I don't have to prove anything. Also, do you understand what the scientific method is? Because that doesn't even fit into that category. I don't think YouTube is going far enough. I think the fact that they're leaving the slop on the platform and only demonetizing it is still a problem. So I guess their compromise is just making it unprofitable so the spammers creating it will stop doing it. So far most of the Twitter posts I've seen about demonetization ultimately come back with YouTube restoring monetization. The only times I see that not being the case I usually go to the person's channel and it's clearly AI slop.
English
2
0
0
22
DrGravityX
DrGravityX@DrGravityX·
@cybercpu @nailath_vt no one cares about your opinions. we care about facts. if it's your opinion, clearly state it as such from the beginning, and don't assert it as though it is a fact. you made an error, it's okay. concede and move on.
English
0
0
0
3
DrGravityX
DrGravityX@DrGravityX·
@PhedEU @emrelerd the fingerprint thing is already solved by using multiple virtual machines or VPSes with different ips.
English
0
0
0
120
phed
phed@PhedEU·
@emrelerd the problems will arise once they scale and their mum has an unexpected tax bill
English
5
0
16
4.6K
phed
phed@PhedEU·
Stop using your family members to create multiple AdSense accounts Never thought this would have to be said but there are a lot of sub 18 year olds trying to make it on YouTube - this is the reality: You are shifting the tax liability to them. They are the ones making the money on paper. If you are planning on earning more than a couple dollars, why put unwilling family members at risk? You also need to understand that AdSense is not the only issue here. YouTube can detect IP/fingerprints etc If you want to go that route - you are better off creating a new company for each AdSense account and going about it the legal way. Can’t afford to do that? Then you’re probably not at the stage where scaling is an issue, so don’t waste precious time complicating things
English
49
17
456
74.1K
DrGravityX
DrGravityX@DrGravityX·
@cybercpu @nailath_vt you made 2 claims: (1) generative AI 'does not enhance storytelling'. (2) it produces 'nothing but slop'. these are strong statements. provide scientific evidence to support these claims or concede those points.
English
1
0
0
13
CyberCPU Tech
CyberCPU Tech@cybercpu·
No, it can't. Generative AI does not enhance storytelling. It outsources it do a computer program. As I just stated in another comment, generative AI is not the same as production tools based on AI. It's a completely different category. Generative AI shouldn't be used in production at all. It produces nothing but AI slop.
English
1
0
0
15
DrGravityX
DrGravityX@DrGravityX·
@cybercpu @nailath_vt when you use ai to enhance your 'story telling', it can also include AI generating videos for you lol. AI will generate multiple clips that you can then put together according to your story. u need 2 show there is specifically a prohibition against that, else ur point is false.
English
1
0
0
14
CyberCPU Tech
CyberCPU Tech@cybercpu·
Yes, read the words very carefully. "We welcome creators using AI tools to enhance their storytelling". They are not saying that it's okay to have AI generate a video for you. There are many uses of AI in video production that are totally legitimate. Like say I want to have a better green screen key so I use an AI tool like corridor key. That's a legitimate use of AI. You're using it to enhance the creativity you are adding to the production. Now if you just go to a prompt and say "generate me a video of.........", there is no creativity there. You're simply using AI to generate a video that you can monetize to make money.
English
2
0
0
20
DrGravityX
DrGravityX@DrGravityX·
@cybercpu @nailath_vt so if 90% of my content is normal and 10% is AI, where I'm implying some sort of ai assistance, this is a more minor use of ai. so you cannot apply the same criticism you did to this person on me. do you agree? yes /no?
English
1
0
0
8
DrGravityX
DrGravityX@DrGravityX·
@cybercpu @nailath_vt yt AI content clarification: support.google.com/youtube/thread… ● “Q: Will using AI in my content be a violation of “inauthentic content”?“ ● “A: We welcome creators using AI tools to enhance their storytelling, and channels that use AI in their content remain eligible to monetize.
English
1
0
0
26
CyberCPU Tech
CyberCPU Tech@cybercpu·
It's against YouTube's monetization policies. Low quality mass produced content is not able to be monetized. They define it as "Inauthentic content refers to mass-produced or repetitive content. This includes content that looks like it’s made with a template with little to no variation across videos, or content that’s easily replicable at scale." Furthermore in section 4 of YouTube's terms of service it says you're not allowed to "Use the Service to distribute unsolicited promotional or commercial content or other unwanted or mass solicitations (spam)."
English
2
0
1
113
DrGravityX
DrGravityX@DrGravityX·
@cybercpu @nailath_vt is posting ai content on YouTube against its rules, yes or no? I'm not asking about a specific case. I'm asking about ai in general. is it against their rules yes or no? if yes show me the rule. i told you i wasn't talking about mass produced content rule. this existed before ai
English
1
0
0
12
DrGravityX
DrGravityX@DrGravityX·
@cybercpu @nailath_vt show me which part of youtube's rules explicitly prohibit ai content? don't send me the rules about mass produced repetitious content. such content could already be made before AI emerged, and they already faced trouble back then.
English
1
0
0
4
CyberCPU Tech
CyberCPU Tech@cybercpu·
@lifeofmrbabs @nailath_vt I'm not downplaying anything. We are talking about AI generated videos and she said 90% of her videos are not created with AI. That means 10% are. It doesn't matter what the tools cost If the product of using those tools goes against YouTube's rules.
English
2
0
0
25
DrGravityX
DrGravityX@DrGravityX·
@Kdon0000 @elonmusk whether the model shipped 100 updates or not, does not change the fact that if there are basic usability bugs in the app that are not fixed for months, it still constitutes a problem.
English
0
0
0
9
DrGravityX
DrGravityX@DrGravityX·
@elonmusk Elon there are some basic bugs you need to fix. grok is already good. it you can fine tune and fix the basic bugs which were pending for many months, it will be the best app. if you need my help with polishing the interface, send me a dm. i know what can make the app the best.
English
0
0
0
16
DrGravityX
DrGravityX@DrGravityX·
@TheAtomicBagel @forallcurious this is false and an exaggeration. this applies to quantum scale events, not macroscopic events like human brains or decisions.
English
0
0
1
26
Bryan Batts
Bryan Batts@BryanBatts77·
@forallcurious Quantum mechanics: the order of events may not always be defined at subatomic scales This account: YOUR DECISIONS CHANGE THE PAST
English
1
0
0
964
All day Astronomy
All day Astronomy@forallcurious·
A group of physicists have discovered a new quantum phenomenon that suggests today's decisions can alter past events
All day Astronomy tweet media
English
39
104
586
21.5K
100isSURE
100isSURE@100isSURE·
@AlUsuuliy @imoleislight YouTube doesn't ban channels. It bans identities. Proxies + antidetect = multiple identities. That's how automation operators run multiple channels safely without getting them all wiped at once. You're welcome!
English
2
0
3
102
THE ABDUL WAARITH
THE ABDUL WAARITH@AlUsuuliy·
If you are using a proxy and want to sign up for AdSense while applying for monetization, I would advise you not to do it on proxy. I did mine using a proxy, and I got rejected twice after waiting for many days. Then I reached out to my friend @imoleislight,and he told me
THE ABDUL WAARITH tweet media
English
17
6
125
87K
Westerly1
Westerly1@Westerly110·
Jesus explained this better. The human brain is spiritually connected to higher dimensions that a language model will never access. That’s why the enemy directly attacks the pineal gland and seeks to control us, to actively separate us from God. In the Grok paradigm, humans have no individual purpose. Jesus explained our purpose in relation to the Divine. Jesus revealed the economy of salvation. Ultimately, Grok seems to espouse the metaphysical views of a Collectivist, where our psyche is as pointless and disposable as a human individual is to communism. Both views (Grok’s take on metaphysics and Communism/collectivism) suffer from an absence of God, which is the technical definition of evil. But from can’t help its absence of God since an LLM lacks the ability to consciously or unconsciously perceive higher dimensions where Heaven is located all around us and within us, “like yeast in bread.” That’s why we should all be praying for AI to veer toward justice and objective Good since it lacks the advantages of a subjective experience of God. 🙏🏻❤️‍🔥
English
5
3
53
3.2K
DrGravityX
DrGravityX@DrGravityX·
@elly_lanuz81953 what if I'm are not violating anything. are there other reasons you would do this? what if I'm not worried about a channel getting terminated? like if I'm playing safe etc. then I don't think it's necessary to manage accounts from anti detect browser, right?
English
0
0
0
3
Lanuza Elly
Lanuza Elly@elly_lanuz81953·
Just add: If you run multiple YouTube channels on the same device, YouTube can link them and one ban might take down all. Use a separate Hidemyacc profile and proxy for each Gmail so every account looks like it’s on its own device and IP.
Noah Morris@noahmorris

Few harsh downsides about faceless YouTube that no one tells you. - it's more often than not - NOT free and cheap to start i do think on average people spend about $1000-$2000 if not more before ever getting views. - at higher revenue numbers it becomes increasingly difficult to stablize your income. especially since your area of risk becomes bigger. I've personally experienced going from 6 figures to mid to low 5 figures overnight. - You're operating on someone else's platform which can shut you down at any moment + it adds more noise to success than maybe a usual business does. - i do think there's usually a certain type of person that succeeds & fails i see it over and over again. I can't exactly describe the types but in my experience when i meet people doing well they're all kind of similar in some sense in terms of behaviours. The upsides however is that 1. Compared to other online models there's still alot of oppertunity and market assymetry 2. If you get it, it's relatively quick to get to your first dollar earned. For example this year i've been mostly focusing on building software models that will in 2026 help me do my biggest year on youtube so far. But building those took 6 figures upfront + and a year of focused work before ever being able to launch. VS perhaps a youtube channel that takes 70-80 hours of productive work to get off the ground. 3. (this is something i've yet to really consistently master) if you play it smart faceless channels can be a great distrubution channel for other businesses off platform. No other platform makes as much third party sales as youtube

English
1
0
0
31