
🇻🇦 Gerald Ironfaith
13.6K posts

🇻🇦 Gerald Ironfaith
@DrJohnMSmith
Shield-Brother of the Faith ⚔️ Rome Eternal 🇻🇦






@Ibn_abdu9 @IslamMumin30 @muslimorthodoxy @InspiringPhilos False. In hadith science, a mursal chain is da'if (weak), but not necessarily maudu' (fabricated). The narrators in the chain can still be thiqat (trustworthy), which Al-Suyuti affirms. Multiple mursal chains become hasan li-ghayrihi; that's why Ibn Hajar said it has a basis.

@DrJohnMSmith @IslamMumin30 @muslimorthodoxy @InspiringPhilos you have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about. if the chain in a narration is broken then it stays inauthentic; that’s why you can’t find it in bukhari or muslim and the consensus of the scholars conclude it’s bananas. are you going to apologize for this lie now?











@Ibn_abdu9 @IslamMumin30 @muslimorthodoxy @InspiringPhilos The chains are mursal (da'if), but the narrators are thiqat (trustworthy), as Al-Suyuti confirms. Ibn Hajar concludes the incident has a basis because multiple mursal chains strengthen each other (hasan li-ghayrihi). That's Sunni hadith science. Source: seekersguidance.org/answers/hadith…









It’s finally here!😎💪🏽 🙏🏽✝️💝 @SCApologia @Acts17David

@Ibn_abdu9 @IslamMumin30 @muslimorthodoxy @InspiringPhilos Ibn Hajar (Fath al-Bari 8:439) says the multiple mursal chains gives the incident a basis: "فَإِنَّ الطُّرُقَ إِذَا كَثُرَتْ وَتَبَايَنَتْ مَخَارِجُهَا دَلَّ ذَلِكَ عَلَى أَنَّ لَهَا أَصْلًا" Source: islamweb.net/ar/library/con… Image:

@DrJohnMSmith @IslamMumin30 @muslimorthodoxy @InspiringPhilos so to get this straight, you lied in your initial meme, then you started coping by referring to a story which is considered broken in transmission and doesn’t even say the lies you fabricated to begin with. Thank God i’m not a christian!




@Ibn_abdu9 @IslamMumin30 @muslimorthodoxy @InspiringPhilos That doesn't make it false. You're confusing sahih (perfectly authentic) with mawdu' (fabricated). Ibn Hajar graded the incident hasan li-ghayrihi (good due to others) in Fath al-Bari, because multiple mursal chains strengthen each other. Source: seekersguidance.org/answers/hadith…. Image:

@DrJohnMSmith @IslamMumin30 @muslimorthodoxy @InspiringPhilos a mursal hadith is not authentic; that’s why it’s called (mursal) the consensus is that you’re still grasping at straws. it’s like you patching verses from the bible and apocryphal books to prove the trinity 💀




@Ibn_abdu9 @IslamMumin30 @muslimorthodoxy @InspiringPhilos Good. You conceded it's mursal (broken) & not maudu' (fabricated). In hadith science, multiple thiqat (trustworthy) chains that are mursal strengthen each other according to the principle hassan li-ghayrihi. That's why Ibn Hajar (top hadith scholar) said the incident has a basis:




What's the #1 thing Christians should understand about Islam?

@Ibn_abdu9 @IslamMumin30 @muslimorthodoxy @InspiringPhilos 1/ - Bazzār & Khuzaymah are 19th-century. - Qāḍī ‘Iyāḍ & Bayhaqī reject it based on ismah (the circular reasoning that Muhammad is infallable), not due to hadith science. - Kathir calls it mursal, not fabricated. His own teacher, Taymiyyah, accepts it.










