Yes. Absolutely Narasimha!. It is rather unfortunate, given the tremendous amount of evidence for 3067BCE and given that there is zero evidence to support a 5.5K BCE date for the Mahabharata. IMHO Prachyam having supported Oak’s vision and date have wasted the time of Indians by doing this. More to the point, they have promoted Oak and that bogus work to nth extent with an entire ecosystem supporting that nonsense. It was unfortunate for Oak that he challenged me… While this has made me more famous, even better, given me so much knowledge on the Mahabharata, Sanskrit and Sanskrit grammar …. so I cannot really complain (nothing like being called a dog with tail between the legs… juvenile and a jackass to spur a super Manglik like me on) , I do feel a tad amused that so many famous people were fooled by this hoax. OTOH, there are hordes of people who speak to me and say that ‘thank God you are doing this work, who knows why x, y and z are supporting 5561BCE date and God bless’ so I suppose I will continue fighting my corner in this era of Kaliyugam which had already started a few decades prior to that GadaYuddha where Bhimasen hit Duryodhan on the thighs. Thanks for the support of all the right minded people for #3067BCE! Mahadev! Sri Rama!
