DrewZero®

1.4K posts

DrewZero® banner
DrewZero®

DrewZero®

@DrewZero

Canada's accountability advocate https://t.co/LkIqt89GIv describes how Canada tried to murder me for creating https://t.co/U7nsLH5SX4 Coined #DIVERSIPHORIA

Vancouver, BC, Canada Katılım Eylül 2009
308 Takip Edilen100 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
DrewZero®
DrewZero®@DrewZero·
How is it that precisely Zero people care that Canada is SO CORRUPT THAT a University of Waterloo CS/EEE alumnus with distinction who is also a MENSA member and has skills in business, law, rocketry, psychology, sociology, engineering, writing and you name it, is homeless and penniless after having nearly been murdered multiple times after which he was taken as a de facto undeclared political prisoner where he was nearly murdered AGAIN with help from Springhill staff such as Sean Macleod... And there's MORE!
English
0
0
2
110
DrewZero®
DrewZero®@DrewZero·
Sadly there is a valid point here. I think there is a lot of missing information about the reason WHY this has occurred and I think the reason might be shocking and unbelievable to many but will fill in or confirm already known things to some. Institutional capture of political parties which pose the biggest threat to the extremist ideology of... Well... Whatever name they go by now, populism, nationalism, it is all synonymous with the ideology of hate that caused WWII. TL;DR organized extremist groups have infiltrated the democratic parties and media
English
0
0
0
832
Konstantin Kisin
Konstantin Kisin@KonstantinKisin·
Calling everyone you disagree with “far right” has destroyed the meaning of the term. I’m sick of seeing serious labels abused to smear ordinary people with legitimate concerns. In 2015, before Brexit, over 50% of the country was concerned about immigration. Does that make half the country “far right”? Throwing these labels around is reckless, dishonest, and damaging to public debate.
English
558
2.6K
15.1K
590.9K
DrewZero®
DrewZero®@DrewZero·
Whenever I hear the words "thank you", even if they are not directed at me my thought process is as such: It reminds me that people are genuinely thankful for helpful things. I realize that most people aren't aware of the multitude of helpful things I do and it can be difficult to foresee the helpful effects that I have calculated years or decades into the future. By hearing the words THANK YOU, I must acknowledge that it likely would be directed to me if everyone were fully informed and fully rational, so that keeps me going despite any official or even conscious acknowledgement of my efforts.
English
0
0
0
3
DrewZero®
DrewZero®@DrewZero·
@WIRED CompanioNation has an AI to help improve relationships and communication which is probably a much better way to use AI, For the good of relationships and humanity
English
0
0
0
2.1K
DrewZero®
DrewZero®@DrewZero·
@brivael Everyone need not fall into this debate if you accept the diamond rule which is a key tenet of the McPhersonian equilism framework, a framework based not on equality, but rather balance and sustainability.
English
0
0
0
192
Brivael Le Pogam
Brivael Le Pogam@brivael·
Tu confonds deux choses, et c'est exactement le piège que la French Theory a tendu. Liberté, égalité, fraternité — égalité *de droits*, égalité *devant la loi*, égalité *de dignité*. C'est la promesse républicaine, et personne ici ne l'attaque. Le wokisme, ce n'est pas ça. C'est l'égalitarisme des résultats. Et l'égalitarisme des résultats, contrairement à l'égalité des droits, n'est pas un élargissement de la liberté — c'est sa négation. Quelques exemples concrets : — San Francisco supprime les classes de maths avancées au collège pour "réduire les inégalités". Résultat : les écarts entre élèves explosent, les familles aisées prennent des cours privés, les pauvres se font enterrer. L'égalitarisme a creusé l'inégalité. — Les politiques de discrimination positive à Harvard : étudiants admis avec des scores très en dessous de leurs camarades, taux d'échec dispropportionné, sentiment d'imposture, ressentiment généralisé. On a saboté ceux qu'on voulait aider. — L'aide humanitaire qui distribue du riz gratuit pendant 30 ans en Afrique : effondrement des filières agricoles locales, dépendance institutionnalisée. Donner un poisson, c'est empêcher d'apprendre à pêcher. Le wokisme ne détruit pas l'humanité dans le sens dramatique. Il fait pire : il dessert systématiquement ceux qu'il prétend protéger, et il génère du ressentiment des deux côtés — ceux qu'on infantilise et ceux qu'on culpabilise. La fraternité républicaine dit : tu es mon égal, donc je te traite en adulte capable. Le wokisme dit : tu es ma victime, donc je dois te protéger de toi-même. L'un élève. L'autre infantilise. Ce n'est pas la même chose, et confondre les deux est exactement le tour de passe-passe qu'on dénonce.
Eduardo Suarez@EduardoSuarez25

@brivael Francia exporta libertad, igualdad y fraternidad desde hace 237 años. Quienes invocan el "wokismo" como destrucción de la humanidad simplemente reflejan su falta de respeto de la identidad ajena, y su necedad de valores, mientras piden respeto a sus ideas niegan las de los demás.

Français
1.1K
8.4K
33.8K
54.8M
DrewZero®
DrewZero®@DrewZero·
@KatieMiller Are you absolutely certain that Hollywood was previously operating on a merit only based system???
English
4
0
1
10.3K
Katie Miller
Katie Miller@KatieMiller·
A decade ago, Hollywood decided it would no longer honor films based purely on merit but also on the diversity of the cast and production team. In 2020, they formally tied Best Picture to diversity. The Academy expanded its membership by roughly 40% in a decade through an explicit push to diversify its ranks. The Oscars will proudly tell you that last year’s invitees were: >41% women >45% people of color >55% from overseas For 88 years, the Academy selected members and honored achievement based on merit. For the last 10 years, invitees went from 112 per year to over 900 to meet diversity targets. This devalues and dishonors great American films and creates perverse incentives that lead studios to inflate diversity numbers in hopes of recognition by their woke peers. Meritocracy must be restored to film.
Katie Miller tweet media
English
1.3K
2.4K
16.6K
16.2M
DrewZero®
DrewZero®@DrewZero·
Most of this stuff is a clever distraction tactic which is being architected by the modern day Adolf Hitler and proliferated by unwitting pawns like Elon to make sure that nobody notices the global genocide that is happening, especially in Canada where hate crime murders are being covered up and victims are being framed and jailed as de facto political prisoners, like the GLITCH (Gravest Legal Injustice Throughout Canadian History) where an organized murder operation by a hate group failed repeatedly so they jailed the victim who had a broken leg, refused to fix his broken leg for six years while federal staff member Sean Macleod facilitated a professional hit by Janson Baker which also failed so the extremist group sent Gabriel Wortman to do a mass shooting while torturing Macleod and his wife for three hours. This was all premeditated and I had been sounding the alarm for years while being ignored because Canada's federal police and intelligence community are captured by the extremist group at the highest levels. That is what this fabricated propaganda is all about and a key aspect of ensuring it succeeds is keeping people like Elon Musk and Donald Trump in the dark about it all. I sent the POTUS a registered letter with evidence and that letter was stolen inside the US mail system!! See the evidence on ZeroJustice.ca or my X account.
English
1
0
0
12
Bull Toaster
Bull Toaster@BullToaster1337·
WTF is wokism? I never noticed any of it till all the nonstop talk about it… your fear has grown into legitimate hate.. well who cares .. WHAT THE hELL is woke? What we probably should do is create a new “fear”’.. fear of narcs taking complete over .. we need it to manifest into the same hate you people have .. so we eradcate the termites in the pillars of all civilization.
English
43
2
23
18.9K
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
La Vérité
Brivael Le Pogam@brivael

Je veux présenter mes excuses, au nom des Français, pour avoir enfanté la French Theory (qui a enfanté la pire des merdes idéologiques : le wokisme). Nous avons donné au monde Descartes, Pascal, Tocqueville. Et puis, dans les ruines intellectuelles de l'après-68, nous avons donné Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze. Trois hommes brillants qui ont fabriqué, dans l'élégance de notre langue, l'arme idéologique qui paralyse aujourd'hui l'Occident. Il faut comprendre ce qu'ils ont fait. Foucault a enseigné que la vérité n'existe pas, qu'il n'y a que des rapports de pouvoir déguisés en savoir. Que la science, la raison, la justice, l'institution médicale, l'école, la prison, la sexualité, tout n'est qu'une mise en scène de la domination. Derrida a enseigné que les textes n'ont pas de sens stable, que tout signifiant glisse, que toute lecture est une trahison, que l'auteur est mort et que le lecteur règne. Deleuze a enseigné qu'il fallait préférer le rhizome à l'arbre, le nomade au sédentaire, le désir à la loi, le devenir à l'être, la différence à l'identité. Pris isolément, ce sont des thèses discutables. Combinées, exportées, vulgarisées, elles forment un système. Et ce système est un poison. Car voici ce qui s'est passé. Ces textes, illisibles en France, ont traversé l'Atlantique. Les départements de Yale, de Berkeley, de Columbia les ont absorbés dans les années 80. Ils y ont trouvé un terreau qui n'existait pas chez nous : le puritanisme américain, sa culpabilité raciale, son obsession identitaire. La French Theory s'est mariée à ce substrat, et l'enfant de ce mariage s'appelle le wokisme. Judith Butler lit Foucault et invente le genre performatif. Edward Said lit Foucault et invente le post-colonialisme académique. Kimberlé Crenshaw hérite du cadre et invente l'intersectionnalité. À chaque étape, la matrice est française : il n'y a pas de vérité, il n'y a que du pouvoir, donc toute hiérarchie est suspecte, toute institution est oppressive, toute norme est violence, toute identité est construite donc négociable, toute majorité est coupable. Voilà comment trois philosophes parisiens, qui n'ont probablement jamais imaginé leurs conséquences pratiques, ont fourni le logiciel d'exploitation à une génération entière d'activistes, de bureaucrates universitaires, de DRH, de journalistes, de législateurs. Voilà comment on a obtenu une civilisation qui ne sait plus dire si une femme est une femme, si sa propre histoire mérite d'être défendue, si le mérite existe, si la vérité se distingue de l'opinion. C'est de la merde pour une raison simple, et il faut la dire calmement. Une civilisation se tient debout sur trois piliers : la croyance qu'il existe une vérité accessible à la raison, la croyance qu'il existe un bien distinct du mal, la croyance qu'il existe un héritage à transmettre. La French Theory a entrepris de dynamiter les trois. Pas par méchanceté. Par jeu intellectuel, par fascination du soupçon, par haine de la bourgeoisie qui les avait nourris. Mais le résultat est là. Une génération entière a appris à déconstruire et n'a jamais appris à construire. Une génération entière sait soupçonner et ne sait plus admirer. Une génération entière voit le pouvoir partout et la beauté nulle part. Je m'excuse parce que nous, Français, avons une responsabilité particulière. C'est notre langue, nos universités, nos éditeurs, notre prestige qui ont donné à ce nihilisme son emballage chic. Sans la légitimité de la Sorbonne et de Vincennes, ces idées n'auraient jamais traversé l'océan. Nous avons exporté le doute comme d'autres exportent des armes. Ce qui se construit maintenant, en silicon valley, dans les labos d'IA, dans les startups, dans les ateliers, dans tous les lieux où des gens fabriquent encore des choses au lieu de les déconstruire, c'est la réponse. Une civilisation se reconstruit par les bâtisseurs, pas par les commentateurs. Par ceux qui croient que la vérité existe et qu'elle vaut qu'on s'y consacre. Par ceux qui assument une hiérarchie du beau, du vrai, du bon, et qui n'ont pas honte de la transmettre. Alors pardon. Et au travail.

Français
3.6K
14.2K
97.7K
46.9M
DrewZero®
DrewZero®@DrewZero·
In Canada it's even worse. The entire Canadian deep state is captured by an international hate group who wields the power of the judiciary to release their hit men and to frame the surviving genocide victims, such as in my case of the GLITCH (Gravest Legal Injustice Throughout Canadian History) where a terror group repeatedly tried to murder me in Halifax (the most infrastructurally racist place in Canada), and after I barely survived multiple times, each time they put me into de facto political imprisonment with a kangaroo Court process or no process at all. In one case they left me with a broken leg for six years and had staff member Sean Macleod set up a professional hit by Janson Baker, which failed so the terror group sent Gabriel Wortman to torture Sean and his wife for three hours while covering it up in a mass shooting (Canada's worst mass shooting a few years ago). Unfortunately the federal police and intelligence community are captured by the extremist group at the highest levels so they let this stuff keep happening rather than letting victims like me finally have justice. This is a massive genocide that is taking place in Canada and I'm one of the very few who are still alive to sound the alarm but still nobody is listening. Why does nobody care about the rise of extremist hate groups and the capture of civilized society?!?
English
0
0
0
15
Victoria Ju
Victoria Ju@victoriajuthera·
@XFreeze That is also very odd, It’s almost like approving criminals’ acts & Disregard victim’s suffering. True Devil’s advocates.
English
7
10
24
1.3K
X Freeze
X Freeze@XFreeze·
Elon Musk on the left’s fundamental moral flaw: “The fundamental moral flaw of the left is empathy for the criminals and not empathy for the victims” They feel sorry for the criminals but show zero empathy for the actual victims There’s also been immense unconstitutional judicial overreach that was never intended and it’s destroying the public’s faith in the legal system This needs to stop Put the victims first. Restore real justice
English
3.3K
15K
60.3K
25.4M
DrewZero®
DrewZero®@DrewZero·
Unlike the criminal trial of an accused defendant, there is no right to remain silent for those who are in charge of the most vital public safety institutions.
English
0
0
0
6
DrewZero®
DrewZero®@DrewZero·
The process of DrewZero® investigating a government group is one which is available to every Canadian citizen because government groups are accountable to every single person in our nation. Now obviously most people are too busy living their own lives to have time or energy to do this. DrewZero® represents all of those who can't or don't want to do this personally. So when DrewZero® states there exists sufficient evidence to determine that the simplest explanation for the continuing rise of hate to the point that it constitutes terrorism is that the head of CSIS has been compromised, Mr Daniel Rogers is required to respond to be accountable to the people, and a failure to respond is necessarily deemed to be an admission of guilt. See ZeroJustice.ca for the official complaints which were sent to CSIS, Daniel Rogers and NSIRA and the hostile, threatening response that was received which we determine is an admission of guilt.
English
1
0
0
11
DrewZero®
DrewZero®@DrewZero·
They do much MUCH worse in Canada. They staged a fake trial with perjured police testimony so they could get me into Springhill Institution where CSC staff member Sean Macleod set up a murder by hit man Janson Baker that was supposed to have killed me but luckily I'm tougher than I look even though I had a broken leg that they refused to fix for six years. The failure of Sean Macleod to turn this attempted murder into a full homicide was why Gabriel Wortman was sent to do the worst mass shooting in Canadian history so that he could torture and kill Macleod and his wife for 3 hours for failing to succeed in the organized crime hit (which in this case has long since escalated to full blown terrorist activity that corrupt double agent Daniel Rogers is insanely trying to cover up, following suit with Macleod I guess). But NONE of Canada's authorities will do ANYTHING about any of this and some are actually trying to facilitate the next mass murder and terror operation. Oh and that isn't even yet accounting for all the pawns in the rise of hate who are committing organized acts of terrorism (known as no touch torture) against vulnerable minorities like neurodivergent people and indigenous people and young Sikh women, Jewish people, etc... Canada is the new axis of evil in this Nazi ideology spreading plague that is currently sweeping the world while clueless people like you sit around complaining about the least relevant survivor who was probably only targeted to trick the public into believing that survival is the norm in miscarriages of justice but I assure you in Canada we don't hear about thee murders of wronged people because they have a long track record of covering it up and discrediting any of the survivors like me, so be aware that by directing your attention and emotion to sensationalized stories like this you are facilitating a holocaust right here in Canada.
English
0
0
0
53
DrewZero®
DrewZero®@DrewZero·
In Canada, disabled people aren't allowed to have a lawyer. If you don't believe me, look at the precedent set in my case. It is quietly creeping into case law just like a certain extremist ideology wants.
English
0
0
0
7
DrewZero®
DrewZero®@DrewZero·
Speaking as one of the most intelligent minorities in Canada, I can say that as a general rule, the policing and justice system in Canada generally doesn't care about murder, as long as it is a hate crime. On the east coast, Halifax specifically, the police and judiciary actively participate in the coverups of organized murders. What is more concerning is that nobody seems to care about this at all! Reply to this posting if you actually do care about this problem in Canada and let's tally up the count.
English
0
0
1
13
DrewZero® retweetledi
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Scam Altman and Greg Stockman stole a charity. Full stop. Greg got tens of billions of stock for himself and Scam got dozens of OpenAI side deals with a piece of the action for himself, Y Combinator style. After this lawsuit, Scam will also be awarded tens of billions in stock directly. The fundamental question is simply this: Do you want to set legal precedent in the United States that it is ok to loot a charity? If so, you undermine all charitable giving in the United States forever. I could have started OpenAI as a for-profit corporation. Instead, I started it, funded it, recruited critical talent and taught them everything I know about how to make a startup successful FOR THE PUBLIC GOOD. Then they stole the charity.
X Freeze@XFreeze

Interesting how it works Elon puts up his own money, rounds up the absolute best AI talent on the planet, leverages every connection he has to secure serious resources, and launches OpenAI in 2015 as a pure non-profit explicitly created to develop AI for the benefit of humanity, with zero profit motive and open research Then the “team” decides they want the bag They push Elon out, take control, and quietly flip the entire thing into a for-profit machine All while preaching the same sanctimonious lines on repeat: “We’re still mission-driven!” “AI for the good of humanity!” “We’d never abandon our principles!” The ultimate betrayal: Elon got zero equity. Not a single share. He funded it. He built the foundation. He got nothing while they turned his non-profit into their personal cash cow This is the level of betrayal and hypocrisy we’re dealing with And for the record.... this lawsuit doesn’t put a single penny in Elon’s pocket. Any win goes straight back to the non-profit to restore the exact mission he founded

English
10.5K
31.7K
185.3K
37.6M
DrewZero®
DrewZero®@DrewZero·
Yes, balance is generally considered the opposite of extreme. While an extreme represents a far-out, one-sided, or intense position (excess or deficiency), balance is the middle path, moderation, or harmony between opposing forces. Instagram Instagram +4 Here is how the two concepts relate: Opposing Definitions: Extreme is defined as being far from what is normal or reasonable (e.g., intense, excessive). Balance acts as the moderating center that avoids the downsides of these intense ends. Sustainability vs. Fragility: Extremes feel powerful but are fragile, leading to burnout, instability, or "broken" states (e.g., overtraining, overleveraging). Balance provides sustainability and prevents collapse. Enantiodromia (The Turning Point): Psychiatrist Carl Jung and ancient philosophers identified that when an extreme is reached, it naturally turns into its opposite to restore balance. For example, too much "yang" (active) becomes "yin" (passive), a process meant to ensure that things don't remain in one extreme forever. Dynamic Balance: True balance isn't always a static middle point, but the ability to manage both extremes by shifting between them as needed. Wikipedia Wikipedia +6 Examples of Balance as the Opposite of Extreme: Emotion: Emotional stability (balance) vs. hysteria or apathy (extremes). Work: Sustainable productivity (balance) vs. burnout or laziness (extremes). Thought: Open-mindedness (balance) vs. fanaticism (extreme). Instagram Instagram +3 Essentially, while an extreme is "too much" or "too little," balance is "just right". Instagram Instagram +2 #EQUILISM
English
0
0
1
10
DrewZero®
DrewZero®@DrewZero·
Some people write manifestos about extremist ideology. My manifesto is about precisely the opposite. What is the opposite of extreme? BALANCE #EQUILISM
English
0
0
1
6
DrewZero®
DrewZero®@DrewZero·
To simplify and clarify my earlier comment, I assert that because of my demonstrable devotion (read about equilism which was a term coined in 2007), to balance, equilibrium, sustainability of everyone, anyone who wishes to damage me, necessarily wishes to damage my life's work which is equivalent to damaging balance and sustainability... By definition this means that if you want to hurt me, you ARE an extremist, aka a terrorist.
English
0
0
1
9
DrewZero®
DrewZero®@DrewZero·
@BWordsleut86138 @XFreeze So far I'm finding that Claude and Perplexity are the best ones. Although the raw uncensored version of Grok is certainly entertaining, I wouldn't yet trust it with anything mission critical.
English
0
0
0
197
X Freeze
X Freeze@XFreeze·
Scam Altman has a incredible track record for being a con artist I don't think anyone has a "former ally turned enemy" list this big with directly with people he worked with A massive new 18-month investigation dropped, revealing the full list of people who worked directly with Sam Altman and now openly say they don’t trust him - they call him a liar, manipulator, scam artist, and worse These are his co-founders, board members, top executives, and biggest partners. Not random haters: • Elon Musk (OpenAI co-founder) ➝ Betrayed the original nonprofit, open & safe AI mission and turned it into a closed profit machine What he says: Calls him "Scam Altman" and “Sam Altman lies as easily as he breathes” • Ilya Sutskever (OpenAI co-founder & former Chief Scientist) Why: Discovered Sam repeatedly lied about safety protocols and bypassed board oversight. What he says/did: Compiled 70+ pages of memos, Slack messages, and evidence proving Sam’s lies → helped fire him. Said he didn’t think “Sam is the guy who should have his finger on the button for AGI” • Dario Amodei (former OpenAI President, now Anthropic CEO) Why: Left because of Sam’s leadership and broken safety promises What he says: “The problem with OpenAI is Sam himself.” Called the company under Sam "mendacious” (full of lies) and compared it to Big Tobacco knowingly selling something dangerous. Accused him of a clear “pattern of behavior” • Helen Toner (former OpenAI Board Member) Why: Sam made it impossible for the board to do its job through constant deception What she says: He was “outright lying to the board” and created a “toxic atmosphere” of psychological pressure • Tasha McCauley (former OpenAI Board Member) Why: Complete loss of trust after years of the same behavior What she says: Senior leaders reported Sam cultivated a “toxic culture of lying” • Jan Leike (former Superalignment co-lead) Why: Sam deprioritized real safety work for shiny products What he says: Resigned publicly saying he “lost confidence” in OpenAI leadership and that the company was “losing its way” on alignment • Mira Murati (former CTO - one of Sam’s closest longtime collaborators) Why: Lost all confidence in his leadership as they approached AGI What she says: Told insiders “I don’t feel comfortable about Sam leading us to AGI” and said his playbook is to say whatever he needs to get what he wants, and if that fails, destroy your credibility • Microsoft executives (including major tensions with CEO Satya Nadella) Why: Felt constantly misled on deals and partnerships What they say: A senior exec warned he could be remembered as a “Bernie Madoff or Sam Bankman-Fried-level scammer” • Paul Graham (Y Combinator co-founder - Sam was YC President) Why: Long pattern of deception during his time running YC What he says: Privately told YC colleagues, “Sam had been lying to us all the time" • Loopt board & early employees (Sam’s first startup) Why: History of chaotic and deceptive behavior What they did: Employees went to the board twice trying to get him fired over lack of honesty and shady behavior These are his co-founders, board members, closest executives, and major partners who actually worked with him all say the exact same things - chronic lying, manipulation, broken trust, toxic culture, scam & deception
X Freeze tweet media
English
845
1.9K
7.2K
22.1M
El Jones
El Jones@ElJonesPoet·
Photo by Yosri. From Halifax to Palestine.
El Jones tweet media
English
1
1
14
344