Drexus

It’s the same reason I hate the whole genre started by “Wicked” where the evil villain is actually just a misunderstood victim. We don’t need to just take time to “understand evil” We need to understand evil is real and it must be destroyed without mercy

Every new car in the U.S. will be required by law to have tech that puts constant surveillance on the driver by 2027. AI in your car will determine if you're sober and fit to drive, automatically turning off the vehicle if it determines you're a danger on the road.

Let me tell you about a law most Americans have never heard of. Eighteen months from now, every new car sold in the United States will come with technology that watches you drive. Infrared cameras tracking your eyes. Sensors measuring your pupil dilation. Software analyzing your head position. Software analyzing your behavior at the wheel. If the artificial intelligence in your car decides you are impaired, your car can refuse to start. Or limit your speed to 25 miles per hour. Or shut off entirely while you are driving. This is not a proposal. This is federal law. It applies to model year 2027. Here is the case for the law. 🧵

Ilhan Omar gives a history lesson: “The last time the Alien Enemies Act was invoked it was used during World War ELEVEN.”

This Orwellian car surveillance mandate is exactly what happens when Washington puts control ahead of liberty. By 2027 every new vehicle will be required to watch and judge you 24/7, with AI deciding whether you’re ‘fit’ to drive. Here in Utah, Reps. Celeste Maloy and Blake Moore voted NO on the Massie amendment to defund it, just like they voted to keep warrantless government surveillance on American citizens. They chose Big Brother’s kill-switch and back-door spying over your privacy and freedom. Utah families don’t need more federal eyes in our cars or our phones. We need representatives who actually fight for the Constitution instead of rubber-stamping the surveillance state. Time to send a clear message in 2026: liberty first, always.

A pasture grazed by cattle alone is a good pasture. A pasture grazed by cattle and sheep, together, is something else entirely. The cattle take the long grass, the coarse stems, the rougher patches. The sheep follow behind and clean up what the cattle ignored: the shorter regrowth, the wildflowers, the species the cattle wouldn't touch. The pasture gets grazed at two heights, by two different mouths, on two different patterns. Twice the use. Twice the work. None of the waste. Add a goat and the bramble line goes. Add a pig on the woodland edge and the parasite cycles break. Add a few geese and the weeds you didn't even know you had quietly disappear. The result is consistently the highest-biodiversity, highest-productivity, lowest-input agricultural system on earth. Higher protein per acre than arable. More carbon in the soil. More birds. More wildflowers. Less disease. Less input. Each species breaks the parasite cycle of the others. Each one prefers the plants the others avoid. The system tunes itself. This is not innovative. It is what almost every functional agricultural society on earth has done forever. Roman estates. Medieval manors. Mongolian camps. Welsh hill farms. The single-species, single-field, single-product model that replaced it is about a hundred years old and is running out of steam on every metric you can measure. The fix is older than the problem. It is a Welsh farm with cattle on the lower pasture, sheep on the upper, a goat on the bramble line, and a couple of geese in the orchard. The farmer would explain it in four minutes if you asked. The policy paper has not asked.