๐๐ก๐ ๐ญ๐๐๐ก๐ง๐ข๐๐๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐ฉ๐ฉ๐๐๐ซ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ฌ๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐. ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ฌ๐๐ ๐จ๐ง ๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐ข๐๐๐ฅ๐ ๐๐ฅ๐๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ๐ฌ.
In the context of the pre-election mission in Hungary, the elements gathered indicate, from a technical standpoint, an overall solid framework. During the meetings, I did not find concrete elements indicating irregularities in the electoral process, nor signs of foreign interference. In discussions with the various interlocutors, differing assessments emerged regarding aspects of the political, media and institutional context. However, especially one week before the elections, I consider it essential to clearly distinguish between established facts, perceptions and political assessments, and to ensure that any assessment is grounded in objective, substantiated and verifiable elements. I do not enter into the merits of the political choices of the Hungarian government. I simply maintain that an observation mission must remain anchored to verifiable facts and not to prejudicial assessments. I therefore dissociate myself from the final statement issued at the end of the mission, which, in my view, reflects political bias and partiality and does not adequately reflect what we were able to observe during the mission. @coe
English
