M 💴

1.5K posts

M 💴 banner
M 💴

M 💴

@EconomyComments

UK wealth manager, stock picker & political commentator

South East, England Katılım Şubat 2026
276 Takip Edilen190 Takipçiler
M 💴
M 💴@EconomyComments·
Ah yes because nothing can ever get better. Things are messed up right now so let’s just sack humanity in and go extinct. Thank god our ancestors had more backbone than you otherwise we’d have been finished long ago. Imagine during the Nazi years or genocidal empires before it if people had just gone ‘this is shit let’s give up and die’. What a pathetic self justification. Just admit you would rather go on holiday than put in the effort to raise a kid and be done with it, not this load of rubbish about the world being a bit tough so let’s go extinct, out of what? Selflessness? 😂 yeah right.
English
1
0
0
11
Big C
Big C@TiosQueso·
@EconomyComments @AlxndrBrwn87 @jonbrooks Why on earth would anyone willingly bring a new life into a world filled with such corruption? Just because you want humanity to continue long after you’ve kicked it? That seems selfish to me.
English
1
0
1
20
Jon Brooks
Jon Brooks@jonbrooks·
My friends in their 30s are deciding not to have kids They’re saying two things: They don’t have the money It’s inconvenient to their lifestyle This is not good. What do we do?
English
2.2K
44
808
76K
M 💴
M 💴@EconomyComments·
@ZackPolanski Where are you getting ‘deregulation’ from? We are possibly the most regulated nation on earth
English
0
0
0
19
Zack Polanski
Zack Polanski@ZackPolanski·
I said "And this sustained project of privatisation and deregulation turned Britain from a place which made things people need to a place which made money for people who owned things." And the City said:
Zack Polanski tweet media
English
112
719
2.2K
55.7K
M 💴
M 💴@EconomyComments·
@GeegWer123 @AlxndrBrwn87 @jonbrooks Who’s shaming others? Do what you want, if you want to be selfish crack on, from this discussion frankly it’d be doing the world a favour, but I am allowed to call you selfish for it :)
English
2
0
0
11
M 💴
M 💴@EconomyComments·
@GeegWer123 @AlxndrBrwn87 @jonbrooks Yes the things that take us away from the 1 thing we are biologically hardwired to do. I know why, they just largely fall into the bucket of ‘selfish’ which I said about a dozen replies ago, you’re now just explaining the breakdown of selfish reasons which doesn’t help 😂
English
1
0
0
11
Actual Leftist
Actual Leftist@GeegWer123·
@EconomyComments @AlxndrBrwn87 @jonbrooks Holy fuck. I have seen dumb people on this app before, but you are a whole next level. birth control, modern medicine allowed kids to live longer, and industrialization forcing us away from homesteading? None of these crossed your mind?
English
1
0
0
8
M 💴
M 💴@EconomyComments·
@GeegWer123 @AlxndrBrwn87 @jonbrooks Why are you so rattled lol I thought it was a spirited debate not an emotional fight 😂 at least you do your handle justice
English
1
0
0
15
M 💴
M 💴@EconomyComments·
@GeegWer123 @AlxndrBrwn87 @jonbrooks They just didn’t want to and wanted to do other things are the same point. They are the selfish ones I am referring to. Other reasons are valid I’m not some absolutist on it all
English
1
0
0
10
M 💴
M 💴@EconomyComments·
I don’t believe everyone should or needs to procreate either, and to some extent brutally that is natural selection, but it shouldn’t be the wider message that having kids is not necessary and kind of a ‘nice to have, if you want’ because they absolutely are necessary so it should be encouraged. I think we kind of agree tbf I’m just a bit more bullish on encouragement of it rather than framing it as a luxury essentially :)
English
1
0
1
10
AlxndrBrwn
AlxndrBrwn@AlxndrBrwn87·
I understand and respect your arugument and maybe even think we are talking about two different t things now. You are arguing population and extinction as an obligation to procreate (I definitely understand the math) I am arguing free will (which I think we have also always had) to procreation. I dont want the world to go extinct. I also don’t believe everyone should procreate 🤷‍♂️😂
English
1
0
0
15
M 💴
M 💴@EconomyComments·
@GeegWer123 @AlxndrBrwn87 @jonbrooks No this point doesn’t hold up - what is your explanation for humans procreating successfully to expand the population when things were TERRIBLE hundreds or thousands of years ago vs now?
English
1
0
0
8
M 💴
M 💴@EconomyComments·
@GeegWer123 @AlxndrBrwn87 @jonbrooks I’ve got kids 😂 is this why you’re so triggered, you’ve decided against kids so you can go to Jamaica and don’t like being told you’re selfish?
English
2
0
0
14
Actual Leftist
Actual Leftist@GeegWer123·
@EconomyComments @AlxndrBrwn87 @jonbrooks This is the dumbest possible framing I’ve ever heard. Agency with your life = selfish. Nah dude you’re right. Wanting to travel is selfish. Let’s culturally pressure women to be housewives and fuck you bc no one willingly will. 💀💀💀💀
English
1
0
0
35
M 💴
M 💴@EconomyComments·
@GeegWer123 @AlxndrBrwn87 @jonbrooks Because you’re crying about things being worse than ever before when it’s actually the best time in human history? 😭
English
1
0
0
19
M 💴
M 💴@EconomyComments·
@GeegWer123 @AlxndrBrwn87 @jonbrooks Do you seriously think 300 years ago people got ‘parental leave’ or better healthcare and were in any way financially better off than the average US citizen today? Seriously.
English
1
0
0
14
Actual Leftist
Actual Leftist@GeegWer123·
@EconomyComments @AlxndrBrwn87 @jonbrooks It’s not selfish to have free will and agency, fucking weirdo. Birth rates would be higher if life was affordable. People in the US get little to no parental leave, family care, no healthcare, high cost of living, and are working more hours than ever for less pay comparitively
English
1
0
0
13
M 💴
M 💴@EconomyComments·
@GeegWer123 @AlxndrBrwn87 @jonbrooks You’re literally missing the point and I laid it out so clearly. If the average becomes 1 kid for every couple, the next generation halves in size, then again, then again. Until extinction. That’s basic maths right? You don’t need more surely?
English
1
0
0
15
Actual Leftist
Actual Leftist@GeegWer123·
@EconomyComments @AlxndrBrwn87 @jonbrooks I didn’t struggle with anything you condescending freak. It’s your framing. What’s your “mathematical evidence” that lowering unplanned or unwanted births is a good thing? That’s your opinion.
English
1
0
0
10
M 💴
M 💴@EconomyComments·
You’re kind of right but drawing false parallels (unintentionally, I don’t think you’re trying to twist facts). For most of human history, other than royalty & nobles, *everyone* was in poverty by today’s standards - they managed. More people are in Gov assistance now because there’s more Gov assistance to try and raise the standard of living. Historically when less were receiving it, they just had worse lives, it wasn’t people were more wealthy and didn’t need it. Re economic gap, again yes sort of, the richest of the rich are just infinitely ahead, but the base level of poverty now vs historically is better. The ceiling has absolutely gotten higher agreed, but the floor has too relative to historic standards.
English
1
0
0
17
AlxndrBrwn
AlxndrBrwn@AlxndrBrwn87·
I don’t disagree with anything you’ve said…other than it’s just not realistic Children being born into poverty all over the world More people than ever are in government assistance….therefore….they are procreating and others are paying for it. There had also never been a bigger economic gap between the wealthy and the poor. No such thing as a free lunch
English
1
0
0
14
M 💴
M 💴@EconomyComments·
Nope. Was super easy to read anyway but I will try differently just for you : The average *needs* to be 2 kids per couple to maintain civilisation. Some will have more, some less, hence *average* (you seemed to struggle with that the first time?) If however, the overall message becomes ‘you don’t need to have kids’, and we get to the point that those doing the heavy lifting buy into it and take the selfish approach, civilisation collapses within a few generations. Nothing I have said is opinion, it is mathematical. Does that clarify?
English
2
0
0
15
M 💴
M 💴@EconomyComments·
@GBPolitcs @Telegraph It’s unsustainable & can be claimed by anyone with no tangible evidence. There must be a better way.
English
0
0
0
116
GB Politics
GB Politics@GBPolitcs·
🚨NEW: The UK has spent over £4bn on disability benefits for stress, anxiety and depression over the last financial year [@telegraph]
English
167
230
1.8K
296.1K