rasmus edelberg

@elonmusk Why do you post such ridiculous comments?

Why are the EU politicians so insistent on Europe committing suicide?

🇺🇸🇬🇱 If the United States attacks, invades or annexes Greenland, it would be the geopolitical equivalent of committing state suicide. This isn’t some distant territory. Greenland belongs to Denmark - a NATO member, an ally. If the U.S. seizes land from a NATO country, this doesn’t trigger “strongly worded statements.” It triggers the end of NATO. Because NATO’s core promise is collective defense: an attack on one is an attack on all. Now imagine the attacker is the United States. In that moment the alliance collapses because the leader becomes the predator. And once that trust is broken, it doesn’t reset in four years. 🧨 What happens next? 1) Europe expels the U.S. militarily Europe will demand closure of U.S. bases across the continent: Ramstein, Aviano, Lakenheath, and more. America’s ability to project power into Europe, the Middle East, and Africa shrinks overnight. 2) It also kills the U.S.’s bilateral defense architecture — the DCAs People forget: after 2022, the U.S. built a whole NATO+ infrastructure through Defense Cooperation Agreements — including Sweden’s DCA. These agreements grant the U.S. access to bases, airfields, ports, stockpiles, logistics routes. Annex Greenland and these deals become politically radioactive. European parliaments will freeze them. Governments will suspend access. The U.S. won’t just lose allies. It loses the physical infrastructure that makes U.S. power possible in Europe. 3) EU responds as a bloc The EU has its own mutual defense clause (Article 42.7 TEU). Europe will be compelled to treat the U.S. as an aggressor state. 4) The dollar and U.S. debt become vulnerable America’s global position rests on trust — including trust in the dollar. An imperial land grab against Europe shatters that. Reserve diversification accelerates. Debt costs rise. Inflation becomes structural. 5) Corporate America gets crushed in the world’s richest market This becomes economic war. U.S. companies aren’t “penalized” — they’re treated as enemy-state assets. 6) The EU-US trade agreement package will be frozen or killed The EU is currently debating an EU–US trade agreement package. If Washington turns into a territorial aggressor against a European democracy, Europe won’t “keep doing business as usual.” It will delay, suspend, or cancel the deal entirely. Especially now, when the U.S. has announced tariffs on allies — Denmark, Sweden, Norway, France, Germany, the UK, Finland, and the Netherlands — explicitly tied to the Greenland dispute. And that will hit American consumers first: higher tariffs, higher prices, disrupted supply chains — at a moment when Americans can least afford it. 🔥 And the most insane part? It hands Russia and China the strategic victory of the century. A self-inflicted rupture of the West — achieved without Moscow or Beijing firing a shot. Invading or annexing Greenland is not strength. It’s not leadership. It’s not “America First.” It’s America alone. And it’s the fastest way for the United States to destroy the Western alliance system that made it the most powerful nation on earth. It’s madness. And I say this as someone who loves the United States — and cares deeply about its future.

@TheLongInvest And now we in Denmark (and thereby the whole EU) get punitive tariffs for sending our own soldiers to a part of our country to strengthen NATO-security, although more security was the wish of Trump. How stupid! Unless his whole purpose is to dismantle NATO and isolate America?

@TheLongInvest Trumpy might want it, but will neither buy nor “take “ Greenland. It is not for sale, and US troops are still welcome to help defend it. European countries sent NATO-soldiers to Greenland because DK is a European country, and they support the Ukraine military in a decisive way.

Trump woke up and said, I’ll either pay for it or take it. Europe won’t do anything. They didn’t send troops to Ukraine & Gaza, they won’t defend Greenland.

The land claim to Greenland is one of the most unjustified land claims in modern history. There is no excuse for it and nobody is going to want to be allies of the USA if they do not honour treaties and attack and stab allies. CNN this evening.

@RasmusJarlov 😂

I went to my local supermarket today and complained that I have a trade deficit with them. I subsidize them hundreds of dollars a month and get nothing in return. (Besides food but who cares). It is a rip off and they have been doing it for years! It stops now. From now on I am imposing an extra expense on myself, when I buy their goods. They may laugh now, but we all know they are going to cave and make a deal.

Tillykke til Thomas og tak for godt samarbejde gennem årene. Det har været intenst, sjovt og udviklende. Og velkommen til @CKrzyrosiak - vi glæder os meget til samarbejdet med dig i din nye rolle fra @SkoleForaeldre side😃

Politisk fokus bør være på rammer og ressourcer til at skabe tryghed og ro i klassen. Konsekvens og grænser er naturlige pædagogiske greb, som bør bruges med omsorg for de børn vi har. I stedet får vi straf, øget hjemsendelse og isolering af enkelte børn. dr.dk/lyd/p4/radioav…

Det er helt hen i vejret at give gaver til alle skolebørn med den ene hånd og fjerne endnu mere med den anden hånd i næste års bevilling.

Inklusion er endnu engang på den politiske dagsorden. Der er behov for at tænke sig rigtig godt om, så forældrene har tillid til, at skolerne kan løfte inklusionsopgaven. Det har @EdelbergRasmus og jeg skrevet om i dagens @avisendanmark. Læs det her 👇avisendanmark.dk/debat/foraeldr…

Dagens gode nyhed, Kbh dropper 97% måltal for inklusion: skolemonitor.dk/del/_qRaA1ADo3…

Nina Smith: “Vi ved godt, hvad der skal til for at få flere børn og unge med. En tidlig indsats, der starter fra børnehaven, til skole og uddannelser. Det er kortsigtet dyrt, men betaler sig på lang sigt” Enig! Og nu har vi endda råd til den kortsigtede udgift #dkpol🙋‍♀️

Du kan støtte budskabet her: skrivunder.net/stop_besparels…?

Vigtigt indlæg fra kommunerne! ⁦@regeringDK⁩ skylder bedre rammer for en holdbar økonomi til børnenes skole og fritid. Danske familier har rekord i samlet arbejdstid, så må staten også levere rammer til kvalitet i hverdagen for vores børn. skolemonitor.dk/nyheder/art989…

@DSeidenfaden @DanskPsykologF Kære Dea, tillykke! Glæder mig til fortsat godt samarbejde.

Glad, stolt og med masser af kampgejst! I dag er det officielt. Jeg bliver @DanskPsykologF's forperson de næste tre år. Jeg vil gøre mit allerbedste. Tak🙏 #dkpol #sundpol #dksocial dp.dk/dea-seidenfade…

Politikerne på Christiansborg skal tage ansvar for, at skolerne har den økonomi, der skal til for at skabe god undervisning og trivsel for alle børn. Opråb fra 6 af vores lokalafdelinger i dag. #dkpol #skolechat #kompol skolemonitor.dk/debat/art98689…

I 2025 får Danmarks børn en boggave på 25 mio kr. Men @regeringDK lægger også op til voldsomme besparelser på #CFU, der skal købe, vedligeholde, formidle og distribuere litteraturen. Det giver ingen mening, siger @jakob_harder i @politiken #dkpol #uddpol politiken.dk/danmark/art984…

Børn skal have den støtte, de har behov for. Kommuner har svært ved at overholde lovgivningen med de ressourcer, de har. Ikke kun i Helsingør. #dkpol må sikre økonomi til skolerne og et godt tilbud til alle børn. politiken.dk/del/xm0MNsAC3t…

Både @troelslundp @venstredk og @PiaOlsen @SFpolitik er enige om vigtigheden af tidlig indsats i daginstitutioner, hvis vi skal mistrivslen blandt skolens børn og unge til livs, i partilederdebatten på #kltopmøde24 #kltop24 - som fremhævet af @bupldk og @line_rosenvinge nedenfor:

Til #kltop24 Arne Hardis og Hans Mortensen @weekendavisen kommenterer velfærdsstatens udvikling fra nære relationer til systematisk velfærd: “Måske er vi nu landet et for upersonligt sted?” Minder om Tönnies arketyper Gemeinschaft og Gesellschaft… mere Habermas og mindre Luhmann

Se mere her: kl.dk/politik/kl-s-p…

Til #kltop2024 hvor @JBundsgaard indleder: “Velfærdens fundament er presset. Men nationalt er der god økonomi. Det kredser om samfundskontrakten. Medborgerskab, civilsamfund og teknologi kan hjælpe. Men arbejdsmarkedet må også tilpasses. Der er meget at se til…”