Edmond Jhangiryan

36 posts

Edmond Jhangiryan banner
Edmond Jhangiryan

Edmond Jhangiryan

@Edmondjhan

curious mind. building things.

Katılım Mart 2017
155 Takip Edilen22 Takipçiler
Edmond Jhangiryan
Edmond Jhangiryan@Edmondjhan·
ran a full pentest on loomenia with @hakiraio 12 vulnerabilities. 5 critical. across rls, auth, and api layers. fixed and verified in 24h paste a url, chat through findings in real-time. no scoping calls, no pdf reports, no back and forth if you've been putting off security, give it a try. genuinely good experience
Hakira ✨@hakiraio

Our AI agent completed an audit for @loomenia_ai. Delivered a full-scope Web2 security audit, identifying vulnerabilities across application logic, authentication flows, APIs, and infrastructure, with actionable hardening recommendations.

English
0
4
10
711
Edmond Jhangiryan
Edmond Jhangiryan@Edmondjhan·
here's what each one costs: nano banana 2 (gemini 3.1 flash) 512px — $0.045 1K — $0.067 2K — $0.101 4K — $0.151 nano banana pro (gemini 3 pro) 1K/2K — $0.134 4K — $0.240 nano banana (gemini 2.5 flash) 1K — $0.039 nano banana 2 vs pro: 50% cheaper at 1K/2K 37% cheaper at 4K nano banana 2 vs original: 72% more at 1K - but adds 2K, 4K, 14 reference images, search grounding, and thinking mode
Edmond Jhangiryan@Edmondjhan

google just dropped nano banana 2 (gemini 3.1 flash image) same prompt, three models: nano banana 2 → nano banana pro → nano banana pro is the quality benchmark 2 is supposed to match it at half the cost and faster speed here's how they actually compare ↓

Filipino
0
0
1
280
Edmond Jhangiryan
Edmond Jhangiryan@Edmondjhan·
google just dropped nano banana 2 (gemini 3.1 flash image) same prompt, three models: nano banana 2 → nano banana pro → nano banana pro is the quality benchmark 2 is supposed to match it at half the cost and faster speed here's how they actually compare ↓
Edmond Jhangiryan tweet mediaEdmond Jhangiryan tweet mediaEdmond Jhangiryan tweet media
Google@Google

Introducing Nano Banana 2: Our best image generation and editing model yet. 🍌 Pro-level quality, at Flash speed. Rolling out today across @GeminiApp, Search, and our developer and creativity tools.

English
0
0
2
509
Edmond Jhangiryan
Edmond Jhangiryan@Edmondjhan·
small ux cleanup, moved all reference images out of modals into a pinnable sidebar grid pin what you use, hide what you don't
Edmond Jhangiryan tweet media
English
0
0
1
194
Edmond Jhangiryan
Edmond Jhangiryan@Edmondjhan·
rebuilt entire pricing had 3 plans that only differed by credit count. the mid tier was a dead zone, just decision fatigue without real value. rebuilt it as 2 plans with real feature gates. each tier unlocks actual capabilities, not just "more of the same." might add a third back later once usage patterns tell me something. but right now, fewer options with clearer differences > more options.
Edmond Jhangiryan tweet media
English
0
0
1
60
Edmond Jhangiryan
Edmond Jhangiryan@Edmondjhan·
one-click photoshoot upload a reference image → get a full set of professional shots in minutes same subject. different angles, poses, framing. no studio. no photographer. no prompts. just upload, generate, and post.
English
1
1
3
147
Edmond Jhangiryan
Edmond Jhangiryan@Edmondjhan·
used to spend more time writing prompts than actually creating images. most ai tools expect you to be a prompt engineer before you can be a creator. here's what it looks like now: 1. upload a reference image 2. pick an environment 3. select a filter 4. hit generate then conversationally make edits on the image - like "Turn into oil painting" no prompts. just click and create.
Edmond Jhangiryan@Edmondjhan

i caught myself trying to “prompt correctly” instead of focusing on iterations i’m building the ultimate UX where AI prompting doesn’t feel like work a place to generate professional-level results, without sacrificing creative freedom

English
0
1
1
213
Edmond Jhangiryan
Edmond Jhangiryan@Edmondjhan·
4% + 40¢ vs stripe's 2.9% + 30¢ sounds like more but polar's fee already includes stripe's processing cost the real MoR premium is about 1.1% + 10¢ when the alternative is incorporating, managing multi-country tax filings, and handling compliance yourself — it's not even close important: this only works for digital products — SaaS subscriptions, digital downloads, license keys, courses. no physical goods, no services if you're in one of stripe's 46 countries and selling digital products, the paperwork alone might be enough reason if you're not? polar means you can actually get started either way, spend that time building instead
English
0
0
0
72
Edmond Jhangiryan
Edmond Jhangiryan@Edmondjhan·
I went with polar because stripe isn't available in my country that was the starting point but the more I looked into it, the more reasons showed up: - no upfront cost to start - 4% + 40¢ per transaction. for comparison, lemon squeezy charges 5% + 50¢ - simple onboarding. I created an org, answered a few questions, and was receiving money the same day - open source heads up: international cards add +1.5%, subscriptions add +0.5%. worth knowing upfront
English
1
0
0
76
Edmond Jhangiryan
Edmond Jhangiryan@Edmondjhan·
building a digital product has never been easier but getting paid for it across borders? still weirdly hard here's why I chose polar sh over stripe — from someone who couldn't use stripe 🧵
Edmond Jhangiryan tweet media
English
1
0
1
132
Edmond Jhangiryan
Edmond Jhangiryan@Edmondjhan·
landing page is live built the whole thing with claude's frontend-design skill still refining copy, now wiring up payment and email link in bio
Edmond Jhangiryan tweet media
English
1
0
1
91

Keşfet

@hakiraio @elonmusk @BarackObama @taylorswift13 @cristiano @BillGates @NASA @nikifrancismediavine