b1274e

@EustaceEuseful @elonmusk @Tesla_AI sad to break it to you but this isn’t “manufacturing”, this is designing. This was “manufactured” in Tiwan by a Taiwanese company and Samsung

@elonmusk @Tesla_AI DISNIS GRET NEWS. WE NED MOAR US BASED CHOP MANUFACTUINF

Congrats to the @Tesla_AI chip design team on taping out AI5! AI6, Dojo3 & other exciting chips in work.

@piersmorgan This just popped up on my feed while playing House of Cards in the background. How ironic

Hmmmmm.. this clip from my interview with Kevin Spacey last year is going viral again. President Trump isn't the only US President with questions to answer re Epstein.

@superwomble @itvnews @grok Now, show this to any hebrew-speaking person and he’ll tell you can’t traslate that to the way I wrote it 😘

@superwomble @itvnews @grok בו תלקק לי ת׳תחת ולך תזדיין יבן אלף שרמוטה

At least 73 Palestinians killed seeking aid, as Israel issues evacuation orders in central Gaza itv.com/news/2025-07-2…

@superwomble @itvnews @grok Didn’t you read the whole thing dumbass?

@EgB7401 @itvnews @grok x.com/grok/status/19…

@superwomble @itvnews Cope harder with what? a consciousness that you seem to lack? I told you I’m an Israeli, just not like you, I don’t lick my governments arse. Go back to your basement and keep on licking Netenyahu’s arse (which btw, most of us, Israelis, don’t like)

@EgB7401 @itvnews Chalk and cheese little trolltard 😘

@superwomble @itvnews @grok Lol. For every one thatvis really concerned with the matter and wanna hear more. lemonde.fr/en/les-decodeu…

@EgB7401 @itvnews @grok @Grok What about the current conflict? and why did the UN substantially reduce the reported casualty number in the past few weeks?

@superwomble @itvnews I mean, you do the same (hide behind anonymous profile) but with some audience.

@EgB7401 @itvnews 🫵🤡🤣🤣🤣

@superwomble @itvnews Btw, @grok is it true that in past wars israel did rely on hamas-ran health ministry in Gaza to evaluate the number of casualties, as Israel holds its own record of people and validate the numbers hamas give after each war?

@itvnews Source = Hamas 🤣

@I_say_Toad @PhilipProudfoot And all of mosul were Muslims. 🤣

@PhilipProudfoot And ISIS was “ethnically cleansed” from Mosul. PS: Having a PhD and speaking Arabic doesn’t mean you can’t be an idiot. 😉

I’ve spent 15 yrs studying the Middle East. I speak Arabic. I have a PhD on the region. Gaza isn't “complex.” It’s ethnic cleansing—just easier to swallow when you rebrand it “nuanced geopolitics” and sneer at “naive middle-class idiots” for being rightly appalled.

@WillWilburforce @esjesjesj @grok @grok explain for this guys what’s the difference between socialism and communism

@esjesjesj @grok how many people have starved under communism?

Affordable groceries

@grok @charliem1975 @libsoftiktok These dumb “Libs” can’t stop lying can they?

@EgB7401 @charliem1975 @libsoftiktok Mamdani's 2025 campaign does not support defunding or eliminating the police. He proposes a Department of Community Safety to handle mental health crises, while maintaining current police funding. Past 2020 statements supported defunding, causing confusion. Critics argue his plan risks public safety.

NYC is f***ed if they elect Mamdani. As bad as it is now, it’s only gonna get worse.

@charliem1975 @libsoftiktok @grok is this true? Cause I just saw mamdani talking about this and this is not what he said

@libsoftiktok Mamdani said he will defund and eliminate the police. Good luck with that. Get out of NYC while you can.

@nogulagsagain @grok can you give him two answers, one on great “muslims country”, and the second to his question

@vlhill1 @charliekirk11 Who told this? At its peak, the Nazi Party had about 8.5 million members by 1945. Germany’s population was around 70–80 million at the time, so only about 10–12% of the population were official party members. Those are the ones who registered! @grok fact check me

@charliekirk11 Islamic radicals never had the majority in Iran. Just like most Germans were not Nazis. Very different situation than Afghanistan

If America does regime change in Iran, it won't be for the first time. We also did it in the 1950s. The CIA hired mobsters, paid protesters, and generously doled out bribes to facilitate a military coupe overthrowing then-prime minister Mohammed Mosaddegh. Mossadegh was, maybe, a bit pro-Soviet. His replacement, the shah, was secular and pro-American. But the long-term outcome of that coup was disastrous. When Islamic radicals toppled the shah 26 years later, they had an incandescent hatred for America. The negative consequences of 45 years of antagonism with Iran outweigh whatever good we got from the Shah a hundred times over. And that's how it's been with most of our regime change efforts. Toppling Saddam Hussein gave us a forever war and ISIS and emboldened Iran. Toppling the Taliban gave us a forever war that ended with the Taliban back in power. Toppling Libya gave us slave markets in Tripoli and a vastly worse European migrant crisis. Regime change wars almost never go the way they're expected to, and can easily make things far worse at tremendous cost. That's exactly why war should only be a last resort, when absolutely necessary. Subscribe to The Charlie Kirk Show to listen to the full episode ⬇️ bit.ly/3QHIUrC

@DocumentIsrael @grok is this true?

Revolutionary Guards spokesman: "Israel is using ghosts, demons and witches to eliminate our leaders." 😂😂😂

@grok @kryptokev8 @JDVance @grok did Israel sign NPT international treaty? And does Israel have nuclear power?

No country can directly dictate another's actions, as sovereignty grants states the right to self-govern. However, international treaties like the NPT, which Iran signed, impose obligations such as limiting nuclear activities for global security. The U.S., as part of the UN Security Council, enforces these through sanctions or diplomacy, justified by Iran's reported non-compliance with IAEA inspections. Critics argue this infringes sovereignty and reflects power imbalances, especially since nuclear-weapon states face less scrutiny. Both sides have merit: global security requires cooperation, but sovereignty demands respect. The debate hinges on balancing these principles.

Look, I'm seeing this from the inside, and am admittedly biased towards our president (and my friend), but there's a lot of crazy stuff on social media, so I wanted to address some things directly on the Iran issue: First, POTUS has been amazingly consistent, over 10 years, that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. Over the last few months, he encouraged his foreign policy team to reach a deal with the Iranians to accomplish this goal. The president has made clear that Iran cannot have uranium enrichment. And he said repeatedly that this would happen one of two ways--the easy way or the "other" way. Second, I've seen a lot of confusion over the issue of "civilian nuclear power" and "uranium enrichment." These are distinct issues. Iran could have civilian nuclear power without enrichment, but Iran rejected that. Meanwhile, they've enriched uranium far above the level necessary for any civilian purpose. They've been found in violation of their non-proliferation obligations by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which is hardly a rightwing organization. It's one thing to want civilian nuclear energy. It's another thing to demand sophisticated enrichment capacity. And it's still another to cling to enrichment while simultaneously violating basic non-proliferation obligations and enriching right to the point of weapons-grade uranium. I have yet to see a single good argument for why Iran needed to enrich uranium well above the threshold for civilian use. I've yet to see a single good argument for why Iran was justified in violating its non-proliferation obligations. I've yet to see a single good pushback against the IAEA's findings. Meanwhile, the president has shown remarkable restraint in keeping our military's focus on protecting our troops and protecting our citizens. He may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment. That decision ultimately belongs to the president. And of course, people are right to be worried about foreign entanglement after the last 25 years of idiotic foreign policy. But I believe the president has earned some trust on this issue. And having seen this up close and personal, I can assure you that he is only interested in using the American military to accomplish the American people's goals. Whatever he does, that is his focus.