Ellen

20.9K posts

Ellen banner
Ellen

Ellen

@EllenAsylumwise

30something fangirl - married to P - mom to J & E - out, loud & proud - always writing stuff - not a fan of labels

Herent, België Katılım Mart 2009
904 Takip Edilen684 Takipçiler
Ellen
Ellen@EllenAsylumwise·
@LOVE4WSN Not a moot but I was there!
English
0
0
1
102
calcifer ! ☻
calcifer ! ☻@LOVE4WSN·
wait out of curiosity how many other of my moots were also at skz hyde park?? im seeing so many ppl say they were there on the tl
English
14
0
34
2.5K
Ellen
Ellen@EllenAsylumwise·
I have literal tears in my eyes
Anish Moonka@anishmoonka

Christopher Nolan asked IMAX to build him a new camera. They did. Then he and Matt Damon spent four months filming The Odyssey on the open ocean, on the largest modern Viking longship in the world, with no green screens at all. The shoot ran 91 days, from late February to August 2025. Seven countries: Morocco, Greece, Italy, Iceland, Scotland, Western Sahara, and Malta. Aside from one indoor studio in Los Angeles, every shot was filmed on real ground. In Italy, the cast and crew climbed 900 feet up a mountain every morning. Imagine walking up a 60-story building before breakfast. In Iceland, they filmed the underworld scenes by lantern light while rain came at them sideways. The four months at sea actually happened at sea. Damon and the actors playing his crew sailed on a real ship called the Draken Harald Hårfagre, used here as a Greek warship. Nolan called the experience "primal." He said the cast and crew were exhausted in a way he had never seen before. The cameras were the other big problem. IMAX cameras have always been too loud to record clean dialogue, which is why directors mostly save them for big action scenes. Nolan asked IMAX to fix this. They engineered a new soundproof case for the camera, a kind of quiet jacket, that lets the lens get within a foot of an actor's face while they whisper and still pick up clean audio. The new cameras also came out lighter and about 30% quieter than the old ones. To prove it worked, the lead cameraman Hoyte van Hoytema filmed a tight close-up of a child reciting a David Bowie song, "Sound and Vision." Nolan watched the test and called it "electrifying." Damon went all-in on the role. He dropped to 167 pounds on a strict no-gluten diet. He grew a real beard for a full year because Nolan refused to allow a fake one. The crew built a full-scale wooden Trojan Horse and shot the attack scene at an ancient walled town in Morocco called Aït Benhaddou. Nolan himself climbed inside the horse with the cast and his cameraman to get the shot. Across the whole shoot they used 2 million feet of film. That comes out to around 380 miles of it, longer than the drive from Los Angeles to San Francisco. At about $1.50 a foot, they spent roughly $3 million just on the film itself. The full budget was $250 million, the biggest of Nolan's career. They wrapped nine days ahead of schedule. Tickets went on sale on July 17, 2025, exactly one year before the movie's release. That had never been done before in cinema history. Half of the 22 US theaters offering IMAX 70mm sold out within 12 hours, bringing in around $1.5 million in a single morning. Nolan called the shoot "an absolute nightmare to film, but in all the right ways." He did not destroy a single IMAX camera. He has wrecked several over his career.

English
0
0
0
28
Ellen retweetledi
Anish Moonka
Anish Moonka@anishmoonka·
Bruges looks like a fairytale because the economy collapsed in 1500. The river that connected the city to the sea filled up with mud and sand. Merchants left for Antwerp, and the money never came back. The town had been Europe's richest trading port. It even had the world's first stock exchange, run out of an inn owned by a family called Van der Beurze. Their family name became the French word for stock exchange. French speakers still call it a "bourse" today. Once the river died, nobody had money to tear down the medieval houses and rebuild. So they stayed. Five hundred years later, in 2000, UNESCO put the city center on its world heritage list. The collapse is what saved it. Belgium is tiny. About 30,689 square kilometers, slightly smaller than Maryland. Inside that, it fits 16 UNESCO World Heritage sites. Roughly one every 1,900 square kilometers, packed in tighter than almost anywhere else in Europe. The train station in the last photo is Antwerp Central. Built between 1895 and 1905 by an architect named Louis Delacenserie. The huge glass-and-steel dome on top is 75 meters high (about a 25-story building) and copied from the Pantheon in Rome. In 2014, Mashable called it the most beautiful train station in the world. The city spent €765 million in 2007 digging a tunnel underneath so high-speed trains could pass through without disturbing the original hall. Right next to that station is Antwerp's diamond district. About a square mile of streets. For most of the last hundred years, this tiny patch handled roughly 84 percent of the world's uncut diamonds. Trade peaked at nearly $41 billion in 2022. By 2025 it had dropped to $19.1 billion, down 22 percent in a single year. Antwerp lost its top global ranking to Dubai and Mumbai for the first time. The gothic building covered in carvings, second photo, is Leuven Town Hall. It took 30 years to build (1448 to 1469) and two of the three lead architects died on the job. The facade has 235 stone figures tucked into little niches, most of them carved between 1850 and 1913. There used to be 236. The statue of King Leopold II was taken down in 2020 because of his role in colonial Congo. In 2024, France pulled in 100 million international tourists. Belgium pulled in 9.64 million and ranked 41st in the world. A country that fits the planet's most beautiful train station, 84 percent of the global diamond trade, and a medieval city frozen in time into something the size of Maryland is getting roughly one tourist for every ten France gets.
Perseus@PerseusLeGrand

Je pense que la Belgique est un pays dont on sous-estime souvent la beauté. Il y a de merveilleux endroits à découvrir, des villes exceptionnelles et de magnifiques paysages...

English
38
274
2.7K
295.2K
Ellen retweetledi
best of vic de angelis
best of vic de angelis@angelisfiles·
🚨 MÅNESKIN REUNION IN 2026 THIS IS NOT A TEST
best of vic de angelis tweet mediabest of vic de angelis tweet media
Dansk
39
1K
13.3K
699.2K
Ellen retweetledi
nayely ☆
nayely ☆@onlytaekey·
im so obsessed with this song oh my god it’s amazing
English
5
783
4.1K
39.5K
Ellen retweetledi
박력탬 Taemin
박력탬 Taemin@babycheese4ever·
Taemin sending a kiss up to his number one fan and self-proclaimed first Taemin mom during the first ever performance of new song called 1004 (Angel) will be looping in my head. The pureness and strength of their affection for each other 🥹 #Taemchella
English
6
1.1K
5.5K
90.1K
Ellen retweetledi
Daniel Lismore
Daniel Lismore@daniellismore·
J.K. Rowling’s Case Against Trans People Falls Apart Under Basic Scrutiny J.K. Rowling’s writing on her site presents itself as cautious, evidence based and protective of women. It is none of those things in any reliable sense. It is a political essay built out of selective fear, anecdote, conflation and repeated framing tricks that turn a small and vulnerable minority into a public threat. Once the central claims are checked against mainstream psychological definitions, clinical guidance and the better available reviews, the structure gives way very quickly. The first problem is basic description. Rowling writes as though trans identity is a fashionable belief system imposed on reality. That is false. Major professional bodies continue to define gender identity as a person’s internal sense of gender and distinguish it from biological traits, expression and sexuality. That does not mean every clinical pathway is simple or that every policy question has one easy answer. It means the existence of trans people is not a fiction created by slogans or websites. It is a recognised human phenomenon described across medicine and psychology for years. Her second move is more political than scientific. She repeatedly folds trans women into a category of male risk and then treats that association as common sense. That is the engine of the piece. It asks readers to accept that recognition itself is dangerous. The trouble is that this is not evidence. It is suspicion dressed up as safeguarding. A rights claim by one group does not become invalid because another group can imagine its misuse. That logic would destroy the basis of civil protection in every direction. She also leans heavily on the idea that affirming trans people means suppressing women or erasing sex. That is another false construction. Recognising gender identity does not abolish sex based medicine, sex based data collection or serious discussion of violence against women. Clinical guidance and professional standards continue to treat sex related health needs as real while also recognising transgender patients as deserving of competent care. The claim that one can only defend women by rejecting trans people is not a medical conclusion. It is an ideological choice. On healthcare her essay suggests that trans identification is being irresponsibly indulged and that medicine has surrendered to fashion. The actual evidence base is more careful than either side’s loudest slogans. For adults, established clinical standards and recent reviews continue to support access to gender affirming care with assessment, informed consent and monitoring. Reviews published in 2024 and 2025 report that gender affirming interventions are associated overall with improved mental health, body satisfaction and quality of life, while also noting that evidence quality varies and further research is needed. That is a long way from the picture of mass delusion that Rowling promotes. For children and adolescents the picture is more contested and the honest position is narrower. The Cass Review in England and later NHS England work show that the evidence for some youth interventions remains limited and that services need stronger assessment, clearer pathways and better long term research. That supports caution and reform. It does not support broad hostility to trans people, nor does it justify using uncertainty in paediatric care as a weapon against trans adults or against social recognition itself. Rowling’s essay repeatedly makes that jump. It is a political jump, not a scientific one. She also gives the reader the impression that transition is commonly regretted and that medicine is running ahead of human reality. The best known systematic reviews do not support that picture. Regret after gender affirming surgery appears low in the published literature, including systematic reviews and more recent follow up work. That does not mean regret never happens or that every clinic gets
Daniel Lismore tweet media
English
276
186
786
42.4K
Ellen retweetledi
saba
saba@yazzsss·
never forgetting when seonghwa was exhausted and on the verge of passing out toward the end of their coachella set he let out a scream during his wonderland sword solo that it could be heard in the livestream
English
7
1.7K
11.6K
123.8K