Naaman
1.2K posts

Naaman
@EneneMiracle
Product Designer | Building @JustJooga
Katılım Mayıs 2020
1K Takip Edilen383 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet

Soon @JustJooga will help you get this data together and see how best you can scout with ease.
CJ@dxbem9
Bruh Lagos alone has 300 registered football academy this is insane!
English

@dxbem9 Currently building a pipeline for local talent scout from grassroot match management to players statistics @JustJooga
English

My take:
Design is changing fast, but let’s be clear:
AI is not killing creativity.
It’s killing repetitive logic.
Grids, buttons, systems those were always patterns,
AI just made them faster,
The real question now is: Do you have taste? Or were you just executing?
Claude@claudeai
Introducing Claude Design by Anthropic Labs: make prototypes, slides, and one-pagers by talking to Claude. Powered by Claude Opus 4.7, our most capable vision model. Available in research preview on the Pro, Max, Team, and Enterprise plans, rolling out throughout the day.
English
Naaman retweetledi

This is really neat but it’s not a design tool as much as it’s a design _production_ tool.
The practice of design is mostly about what comes before production.
There’s no doubt in my mind that all parts of software production will become automated very soon. Writing code, making web pages, putting pieces of a design system together etc.
And that’s fine. I think few people actually enjoy this kind of production work. Wouldn’t it be better if we spent our precious time in life on what is more meaningful?!
At the core, the practice of design is methodical; like architecture, not like art. In a nutshell: We find constraints, form comprehension of the whole and propose solutions that honor those constraints. First after that do we enter some form of production phase, usually prototypes first, learn about some constraints that were hidden before, loop back, prototype and then build the production-grade “final” artifact.
These last few tasks are quickly losing value because AI tools can do it much faster (not yet better though) than humans. It’s simply just what has the best RoI for a business.
Some companies and individuals will continue to spend human time on certain parts of the “production line” as a market differentiator, but it will cost them a relatively high price compared to competitors.
Anyhow, I still haven’t seen a tool better than Figma that supports the actually-interesting part of the design process.
I wouldn’t be surprised if Figma focused their products on that, maybe separating “products for production” of “products for ideation & exploration.” The latter would obviously still leverage AI, but not to do the work for me but rather to support my efforts the way a therapist helps me live a better life (not living my life for me.)
Claude@claudeai
Introducing Claude Design by Anthropic Labs: make prototypes, slides, and one-pagers by talking to Claude. Powered by Claude Opus 4.7, our most capable vision model. Available in research preview on the Pro, Max, Team, and Enterprise plans, rolling out throughout the day.
English



