

Enveitea
534 posts

@Enveitea
|| Defi researcher || Web3 enthusiast






Today, we updated Gemini 3 Deep Think to further accelerate modern science, research and engineering. With 84.6% on ARC-AGI-2 and a new standard on Humanity’s Last Exam, see how this specialized reasoning mode is advancing research & development 🧵↓

best food i had in Japan was Shake Shack

December is going to be packed full of Product Updates ⚒️ 🔜 VOOI Assets Portfolio → A new way to manage your multi-chain Crypto and RWA assets on VOOI. Set to be launched in the upcoming time. 🔜 @Lighter_xyz Integration → the next DEX venue to arrive soon, earning Lighter points while trading on VOOI. 🔜 A new DEX will also join VOOI V2 → make your voice heard in the poll. 🔜 Team is actively working on the Yield Products availability for VOOI users. Performance tweaks also went live on VOOI - with more news and updates to come! :/>



Btw, I consider these kinds of fud further evidence that we've been in a "bear" for a while now. They're not really the kind of things that happen 1 month into a bear. Consider if BTC had trended higher instead of essentially ranging for a year. The distance from the top to Saylor's and Tether's BTC cost basis would have been larger and it would have taken us 6-8mo to get to these discussion points instead of 1mo.

Let's talk about why InfoFi campaigns are fundamentally broken. Not because the idea is bad. Because the incentives are wrong. WHAT INFOFI MEASURES: - Impressions - Follows - Likes - Retweets - Noise All easily bottable. All gameable. All vanity metrics. WHAT INFOFI DOESN'T MEASURE: - Who actually used the product - Who stayed after qualifying - Who's a real human vs bot - Intent vs compliance - Quality vs quantity This creates the farmer problem: 1. Campaign rewards impressions 2. Farmers optimize for impressions 3. Projects pay for bots 4. Real users get diluted rewards 5. Everyone loses except farmers Industry knows this. Everyone talks about it. "60-70% of campaign budgets go to farmers" is just... accepted. Like rug pulls. Like scams. We've normalized dysfunction. The solution isn't "no campaigns." It's better campaigns. Measure what matters: - Onchain actions (can't bot in masses) - Actual usage (can't fake) - Retention (reveals intent) - Behavior patterns (catches farmers) InfoFi and ActionFi can coexist. InfoFi for awareness/reach. ActionFi for verification/quality. Use InfoFi to get 1000 people interested. Use ActionFi to identify the 100 who actually care. The problem isn't the InfoFi campaigns. It's measuring the wrong things and being surprised when people optimize for them. Fix the metrics. Fix the incentives. That's it.
