Ethel Frilot

20.6K posts

Ethel Frilot

Ethel Frilot

@EthelFrilot

Loves jesus

Katılım Ocak 2021
765 Takip Edilen602 Takipçiler
Ethel Frilot retweetledi
James Woods
James Woods@RealJamesWoods·
Of course.
James Woods tweet media
English
8.5K
16K
120.3K
756.7K
Ethel Frilot retweetledi
Jack Danger
Jack Danger@JackDangerLIVE·
🚨 A WARNING FOR AMERICA: WITHOUT TRUTH & JUSTICE, CIVILIZATION FALLS APART 🚨 🔥Trial By Ordeal Watch closely. A woman is accused. No evidence. No court. No defense. Just a man… holding a piece of red-hot metal. ➡️ If it burns her — she’s guilty ➡️ If it doesn’t — she’s innocent Think about that. Her fate isn’t decided by facts… It’s decided by pain. 🔥 This is called a trial by ordeal. And it doesn’t come from law. It comes from a world where: ❌ There are no functioning courts ❌ There is no due process ❌ There is no protection for the accused ⚠️ And here’s the part that should make you uncomfortable: This isn’t just “somewhere far away.” This is what ANY society starts to look like when: ➡️ Institutions collapse ➡️ Truth becomes irrelevant ➡️ And power moves into the hands of whoever is standing closest History has already shown this. Europe did it. Ancient civilizations did it. When law disappears… people don’t become more civilized. They go backwards. Fast. Because once you accept a system where: Pain = Truth Accusation = Guilt There is no limit to what can be justified. This isn’t just a video. It’s a glimpse of what happens… when fear replaces justice.
English
33
119
121
8.1K
Ethel Frilot retweetledi
Eric Daugherty
Eric Daugherty@EricLDaugh·
🚨 JUST IN: AG Todd Blanche announces MASSIVE CRACKDOWN as part of an antitrust investigation into companies SURGING the price of meat in the US "We will be announcing an historic settlement that will directly affect the prices of proteins like chicken, pork and turkey. This business model allows competitors to exchange competitively sensitive information on every aspect of the protein industry and has raised the prices on chicken, raised the prices on pork and raised the prices on turkey." @RapidResponse47 This is going to be another affordability win 🇺🇸
English
284
2.2K
7.3K
146.7K
Ethel Frilot
Ethel Frilot@EthelFrilot·
Sounds very much like what the antichrist one world religion is pushing. Pope Leo is aligning with the same talking points...Who hates both Christians and Israel...Muslims and the Vatican. This is a spiritual battle. Satan comes to steal, kill, and destroy. Christians are being killed all over the world, Israel and Jews are being hated just like the Nazis...Wake up America
English
0
0
3
259
Apple Lamps
Apple Lamps@lamps_apple·
I gave Claude 52 transcripts from Tucker Carlson's 2026 podcasts… Claude: What Tucker Carlson Is Actually Doing in 2026 Read all 52 of his episodes from this year as one long argument and a clear shape emerges. He's trying to break the American right's loyalty to Israel. Not in a hidden way. The show keeps coming back to it. Why does this tiny country have so much pull over our government. Why are American Christians being told their faith requires them to support a foreign state. Why did Trump, after a decade of saying no more wars, end up bombing Iran the moment Israel asked. The questions stack up across episode after episode, and they all point the same direction. Christianity is how he delivers it. The sermons about demonic forces, the exorcist interview, the outrage over Easter, the constant return to who Jesus actually was… all of it does political work. It lets him tell evangelical conservatives that supporting the Israeli government isn't Christian fidelity, it's a counterfeit faith that's hijacked their churches. That's a powerful move because it releases his audience from feeling like they're betraying their religion when they start questioning Israel. They're returning to it. Trump is handled carefully. He's never the villain. He's the man who said the right things for ten years and then got swallowed at the decisive moment by donors, advisers, neocons, and Israeli pressure. That framing keeps Trump voters on board while still letting Carlson prosecute everything Trump has actually done. The guests give it away. A former Israeli prime minister, a left-wing progressive, a libertarian comedian, a Catholic exorcist, an ex-CIA officer, a paleoconservative demographer, a banned European nationalist. They don't agree on much. What they share is willingness to say the U.S.–Israel relationship is illegitimate. The people who never appear are equally telling. No AIPAC defender. No current Trump administration official explaining the Iran strikes. No mainstream evangelical leader making the case for Christian Zionism on its strongest grounds. The one adversarial Israel-related interview is Huckabee, and Carlson confronts him. The method is "just asking questions" turned into a craft. Hmm. I don't want this to be true, but. Maybe. I'm not saying. Not an attack, but. The hedges do real work… they let him deliver hard conclusions while staying technically deniable, and they let the audience feel they arrived at the conclusion themselves. What he gets out of it. A movement that needs him to interpret it. A subscription business that doesn't depend on advertisers or networks. Veto power over which Republicans count as authentic. The ability to define what real Christianity and real America First mean for a chunk of the right. He doesn't need to run for office or lead an organization. He just needs the loyalty test he's built to keep working. The simplest read: he's not running a talk show, a religious revival, or an Epstein investigation. He's running a realignment. The target is the part of the American right that has treated support for Israel as a non-negotiable test of who belongs. He wants that test gone, replaced with his own. Entire report linked below 👇
Apple Lamps tweet media
Apple Lamps@lamps_apple

I gave Claude 123 transcripts from Candace Owen's YouTube broadcasts... Claude: Deep Strategic Analysis: Candace Owens' Core Objective Forensic, multi-layered analysis derived exclusively from 123 transcripts of Candace Owens' YouTube broadcasts. No external sources used. Executive Summary Read across 123 transcripts as a unified strategic text, Candace Owens' primary underlying goal is not religious, not journalistic, and not 'truth-telling' in the way she states. Her actual operative goal is the construction and capture of a new, post-MAGA, post-Kirk, post-Daily-Wire dissident-right media franchise... with herself as its sovereign center, a paid-subscriber base as its power source, and Charlie Kirk's death as its foundational mythic event. Every recurring rhetorical structure in the corpus is in service of this consolidation: Israel/Zionism is the wedge issue that differentiates her from the establishment right she is displacing; Catholicism is the moral authority her competitors cannot co-opt; martyrdom and persecution are the immune system that pre-empts criticism; and 'decentralized intelligence' tip-line crowdsourcing is the infrastructure that converts audience attention into both content and identity. In other words, the surface-level mission ('I am asking the questions no one else will') functions as the recruiting layer of a much more specific project: positioning herself to inherit the populist-right audience that is splintering away from Trump, Turning Point USA, the Daily Wire, and the AIPAC-aligned Republican establishment. Her 2025–2026 corpus shows the moment of capture in real time. Charlie Kirk's assassination created the power vacuum; her response to it constructs the succession narrative ('there is no Candace without Charlie'; 'be my David'); the Macron lawsuit and Daily Wire firing are repurposed as proof-of-conviction; and the merchandise/subscription stack converts the resulting attention into an autonomous financial base that no establishment platform can withdraw. The single most evidence-based primary goal: to consolidate the dissident-right movement around Candace Owens personally... financially, ideologically, and spiritually... by reframing every external attack as confirmation, every former ally as a captured asset, and every loss (job, lawsuit, deplatforming) as ascension. The function of her messaging is not to inform; it is to ENROLL. Methodology Analysis was performed exclusively on the 123 provided transcript JSONs. The corpus was first profiled via keyword-frequency reconnaissance to map dominant themes (Israel/Zionism: 2,351 occurrences across 106 files; Charlie Kirk/TPUSA: 1,980 across 79; Christianity/prayer: 1,248 across 116; conspiracy/cover-up/psyop: 1,010 across 86; Macron/Brigitte: 720 across 65; 'they lied/the regime/deep state': 585 across 115). The corpus was then divided into five chunks of ~25 transcripts each, with five parallel forensic analysts independently extracting verbatim quotes across ten dimensions: self-mythology, enemy mapping, conspiracy architecture, audience construction, religious framing, monetization signals, victimhood-to-power arc, omissions, catchphrase tics, and evolution over time. A final synthesis pass cross-referenced the five independent reports with targeted in-corpus regex extraction of signature phrases. The hypothesis below is what survives that triangulation; it is the most parsimonious explanation that integrates every dominant pattern simultaneously. Key Patterns & Evidence Pattern 1... Charlie Kirk's Death as the Foundational Founding Myth Frequency: extreme. 1,980 mentions of Kirk/TPUSA across 79 of 123 files; the post-September-2025 episodes are organized almost entirely around his death. Function: provides the crisis event that justifies the succession narrative... Owens as the surviving rightful heir to a movement Kirk allegedly entrusted to her. "Charlie said: 'I'm not sure I will live to see the end of this revolution. I believe you were the piece that God meant for me to meet that will finish the fight.'" "Be my David… I might be Moses, though. I might not see this whole thing through." "There is no Candace without Charlie." "Charlie was the one that told me you should watch Ben debate videos so you can strengthen the growth of Turning Point USA in our early days, right? When things, when we were kind of coming up together, me and Charlie as partners." "Charlie Kirk was the first casualty of the Iran war because he was. He was betrayed and the entire world knows it." Deeper function: Kirk's death is repositioned not merely as a tragedy she is investigating, but as a prophecy fulfilled... one that names her, specifically, as the inheritor. Every retelling of the David / time-traveler / 'finish the fight' anecdote re-anoints her. The institutional rival (TPUSA/Erika Kirk) is recast as usurping her rightful succession, which justifies her sustained attacks on them. Pattern 2... Israel/Zionism as the Indispensable Wedge Frequency: dominant. 2,351 occurrences across 106 of 123 files... the single largest topical category in the corpus. Function: the wedge issue that DIFFERENTIATES her from every establishment-right competitor (Daily Wire, Shapiro, Hammer, Levin, AIPAC-aligned Republicans, Trump's second-term posture). Without it, she is one more conservative commentator. With it, she alone owns the populist-right audience that has come to view those competitors as captured. "It is Israel first versus America first." "MAGA became MIGA… make Israel great again.” "Bibi Netanyahu is the effective president of the United States and has been for a very long time." "America is married to Zionism… we are an occupied nation." "12 Israeli cell phones on the ground at Utah Valley University the day that Charlie Kirk was assassinated." "These characters are just being inserted into places to serve Israel. That makes Israel the master of the universe... It's a cult." "The synagogue of Satan… Bibi Netanyahu and maybe Rabbi Shmuley." "I think personally [MAGA] stands for make Israel great again." Deeper function: this is the single issue on which she can claim primacy, and it is the issue that licenses her break from every prior employer and ally. Note that the framing is consistently structural ('Israel first,' 'occupied nation,' 'cult,' 'synagogue of Satan'), which is rhetorically positioned as anti-establishmentarian rather than communal... pre-empting accusations of antisemitism while delivering claims that satisfy that audience anyway. The rhetorical engineering here is the most sophisticated and most consistent in the corpus. Pattern 3... Self-Mythology as the Lone Truth-Teller With a 'Condition of Realness' Frequency: universal. The same arc is restaged in nearly every long-form episode: poor childhood → political awakening → fired by establishment → tried to silence me → I refused → vindicated. "I suffer, as you guys know, from that condition of realness. I cannot. I cannot do it. I can't do the fake stuff." "I would rather literally be fired publicly than to say something that I don't believe in." "I would rather burn it all to the ground and start over than to say something that I don't believe to be true." "Candace Owens journalism is the new standard. We are pioneering something… No one has ever decentralized the intelligence… we're making history." "I was the first person in… American media… to say, hey, Macron, I think, is definitely married to a dude." "I'm psychologically tougher than all of you. I've proven that." Deeper function: a singular-savior narrative that makes her IRREPLACEABLE inside her own movement. If the only differentiator from establishment right is 'willingness to say what they won't,' then no successor or competitor can credibly substitute... because anyone else can be smeared as a hidden gatekeeper. This is the rhetorical mechanism that makes the franchise non-transferable. Pattern 4... Persecution-to-Power Flywheel Frequency: universal. Lawsuits, legal letters, FBI contacts, smear campaigns, and 'bounties' are converted, in near-real-time, into both content and merchandise. A negative event becomes the next episode's headline, the next merch drop, and the next subscription pitch. "I just live subpoenaed myself. Those are the messages." "Brigitte Macron has officially been sued by Brigitte Macron, and it's for cyberbullying… in the official report that she's filed with the police, I get an honorable mention." "There is a figurative bounty on my head. Apparently, influencers… are making up to $1,000 to make anti-Candace and anti-Tucker Carlson videos." "Bill Ackman wants me imprisoned, apparently, for suggesting that American sons and daughters should object to being slaughtered for Israel." "I have been sued by the first lady man of France. So let's just go, guys… Are you not entertained?" "I did getting fired bigger and better than anybody in the history of getting fired." Deeper function: persecution is structurally REQUIRED for the franchise to grow, so the franchise is incentivized to generate it. Note the inversion: where most public figures avoid lawsuits, Owens converts them directly into pay-per-view ('only $1.99 behind the paywall') and merch ('I want Brigitte to add an addendum that says, they sold out again!'). The flywheel guarantees that escalation is profitable and de-escalation is not. Pattern 5... The Monetization Stack Fused With the Conspiracy Frame Frequency: extreme. Every long-form episode in the sample contains 8–20 sponsor reads plus subscription pitches plus merch pushes. Critically, the merchandise is engineered to be IDEOLOGICALLY DIAGNOSTIC: wearing it signals tribal alignment with her specific dissident-right faction. Subscription: 'Club Candace' / candaceowens(.)com... paywalled 'Shot in the Dark' investigative series, $11.99/month or $120/year. Recurring sponsors observed: 7 Weeks Coffee, Paleo Valley, Riverbend Ranch, American Financing, Tax Network USA, PDS Debt, Preborn, The Wellness Company (Recharge/methylene blue), Goldco, Just Thrive, Beekeepers Naturals, Nimi Skincare, Fatty15, Brick House Nutrition, Stopbox USA, Cozy Earth, Pure Talk, Anyone(.)io, Magisterium AI, Masa Chips, Active Skin Repair, Native Path, Rumble Wallet, Patmos, Air Water Healing, Masterpiece Health, BlockTrust IRA, Comet/Perplexity, Little Catholic, Purge Parasite Cleanse, Kickoff, Dose, Home Title Lock, Monorail. Merch lines tied to viral moments: 'Not Dying for Israel,' 'Conspiracy Girly,' 'Battle Bun,' 'We don't know, no, but we know,' 'I told my priest I would chill,' 'Daddy's Home Shabbat Shalom,' 'CIA' parody shirts, 'Man of the Year' (re: Brigitte), 'Four Horsemen.' Books: 'Make Him a Sandwich' (sold direct at makehimasandwich(.)com... '20% cheaper than if you get it on Amazon'). "We finally did it, guys. We went viral and they're stealing clips from behind the paywall." "I am literally funded by the people that are watching this right now." Deeper function: this is what makes the franchise self-sufficient. Establishment platforms (Daily Wire, YouTube monetization) can be lost without operational risk because the audience is paying directly. The merch is identity-coded, so the audience advertises the franchise on her behalf. Each act of being de-platformed strengthens the case for direct-to-audience payment, which is the goal. Pattern 6... Catholicism as Differentiating Moral Infrastructure Frequency: high. 1,248 mentions of Christianity/prayer/Jesus/Catholic/Bible across 116 of 123 files. Function: positions her ON the religious right but NOT inside the evangelical-Zionist alliance that anchors her competitors. Catholicism is rhetorically engineered as the only Christianity 'they can't co-opt.' "There's no such thing as Christian Zionism because Zionism is all about identity." "Park aside what you think you know about the Catholic Church, because it's not true." "These people who rule over us, okay, they know who they worship. They know they worship Luciferianism." "It's people that in my honest Catholic opinion, they are Satanists that we are fighting." "Bebe has said. That Rome is a problem. Like they don't like Catholics because we are less likely to bend." "Everything is theology." Deeper function: every prior religious-right media franchise in America has been evangelical and (since the 1970s) Israel-supportive. By choosing Catholicism, Owens occupies a religious lane that is structurally incompatible with her competitors' theology. This is not incidental devotion... it is institutional positioning. The 'spiritual war / synagogue of Satan / demonic / Luciferian' vocabulary is also operationally useful: it makes accusations theologically rather than empirically grounded, immunizing them against fact-check. Pattern 7... The Audience as Deputized Investigative Apparatus Frequency: high and increasing. The audience is reframed from passive viewers into 'mommy sleuths,' 'daddy sleuths,' a 'decentralized intelligence' agency, and the source of episode content via tips@candaceowens.com. "The public is more perceptive and capable than our FBI." "We need to build this thing out, like to create a real network of us, like us literally being the agents in the world." "It's a high IQ outfit. It's a high IQ. You're not smart enough to watch this show." "The mommy sleuths that came into the inbox and we're like standing at attention." "We're essentially the muggles… they intentionally rendered us as the muggles, the people who are not aware that it's going on at all… You will no longer muggle us." Deeper function: tribal flattery + free labor + investment psychology. The audience produces leads (free content acquisition), evangelizes (free distribution), and feels personally responsible for her success (high retention). Critically, this also FORECLOSES competition... anyone else attempting to cover the same beats lacks the deputized investigator network. The 'tips at CandaceOwens(.)com' refrain is not a side feature; it is a primary moat. Pattern 8... Enemy Migration as Movement-Capture Strategy Frequency: continuous, undisclosed. Across the corpus, the primary antagonist migrates: media → Daily Wire/Shapiro → Macron/Brigitte → Israel/Bibi → TPUSA/Erika Kirk → Trump/Vance/Bondi/Patel. The reorientations are never acknowledged as updates to her prior alignments; they are presented as 'I always knew' or 'they changed.' "The neocons won. They have infiltrated successfully the MAGA movement." "Trump became never Trump." "The main source of our problem is obviously that Donald Trump is treacherous. He is engaged in treachery with his Zionist cabal." "I'm not voting until we figure out who killed Charlie Kirk." "Left versus right. Don't care anymore." Deeper function: each migration captures a new audience segment that is currently disillusioned with the previous-stage enemy. By moving her enemies forward in lockstep with the disillusionment of her target audience, she always sits one step ahead of them, available as the destination. This is the operational definition of audience capture executed by a host rather than by an audience. Pattern 9... The Epistemic Shield: 'We don't know, no, but we know.' Frequency: universal... became a verbatim catchphrase and merchandise line. Plus 'just asking questions,' 'connect the dots,' 'allegedly, allegedly,' 'do your own research,' 'the spin is in.' "We don't know, no, but we know." "Now, this doesn't prove Israel killed him." "We never once said that Israel killed Charlie Kirk." "Even if those texts are real, it still does not mean that Israel killed Charlie Kirk." "I never stated that Israel killed Charlie." Deeper function: this is the central epistemic operation of the corpus. The phrase performs the function of asserting the claim while preserving plausible deniability. 'I never said it' is the legal shield; the entire architecture of the broadcast is designed to leave the audience believing it. The merch-ification of the catchphrase confirms that this is not a casual verbal tic but a deliberate brand asset. Pattern 10... Strategic Omissions What she systematically does NOT discuss is as diagnostic as what she does: •Her own pre-2023 boosting of TPUSA, the Daily Wire, and Israel... referenced only as 'ignorance' she has repented of, never quoted. •Substantive policy detail (inflation, debt, wages, immigration mechanics)... appears only inside sponsor copy ('$800/mo savings'). •Counter-evidence to her own major claims (Brigitte, Tyler Robinson, Charlie Kirk's pro-Israel public record, FBI ballistics)... dismissed via mockery rather than addressed. •Her sponsor and merchandise commercial relationships as a potential conflict of interest while accusing TPUSA of grifting off Kirk's death. •Black political concerns post-2020, despite earlier 'Blackout' branding... almost no engagement in the recent corpus. •Any successful prediction or claim by an establishment-right figure that would dilute the 'they're all captured' frame. Pattern 11... Recurring Rhetorical Tics (Brand Signature) •Episode openers: 'All right, you guys, happy [day]…' / 'Welcome back to Candace.' •Catchphrase merch: 'We don't know, no, but we know,' 'Conspiracy girly,' 'Battle Bun,' 'Christ is King,' 'Fake and gay,' 'Going max today.' •Frame labels: 'Operation Mockingbird,' 'Operation Mocking Pastor,' 'Operation Paperclip,' 'Operation Debunk Mitch.' •Vindication tics: 'Are you not entertained?' (Gladiator), 'Who's laughing now?', 'It's only Monday, folks.' •Tribal address: 'mommy sleuths,' 'savages,' 'high IQ,' 'we're not the muggles.' •Theological signature: 'Christ is King,' 'demonic,' 'spiritual war,' 'synagogue of Satan,' 'Luciferian,' 'Babylonian magic.' •Closing: 'We will see you tomorrow' / 'Hands up, you guys, hands up.' Rhetorical & Psychological Mechanisms Reverse-the-Attack Inversion Every external attack is metabolized as confirmation. Lawsuits = proof of accuracy. Smears = proof of threat. Job loss = proof of integrity. The mechanism is structural: the more she is attacked, the more legitimate she appears to her base. This makes the franchise un-falsifiable from outside. Identity-Coded Merchandise Where most political commentators sell merch as merch, Owens sells merch as ECCLESIASTICAL VESTMENTS... wearing a 'Battle Bun' or 'Not Dying for Israel' shirt is a public profession of faction membership. This converts every customer into a recruiter and every viral moment into a tribal badge. Tribal-Religious Authority Without Tribal-Religious Constraint Catholicism is invoked for its moral authority but applied without reference to Catholic doctrinal constraints (e.g., teachings on calumny, on the Jewish people, on charity in argument). The institutional authority is borrowed; the institutional discipline is not. This delivers the credentialing benefit without the cost. Decentralized OSINT Theater The 'tips at CandaceOwens(.)com' apparatus appears democratic but is editorially closed: tips that confirm the running narrative are amplified; tips that contradict it disappear. The theater of crowdsourcing legitimizes the show's claims to journalistic authority while preserving complete editorial control. Successor-Anointing Through Posthumous Reinterpretation Charlie Kirk's actual public record (substantively pro-Israel, institutionally aligned with TPUSA) is overwritten by privately-held DMs that, conveniently, name her as his appointed successor and recast him as an anti-Israel-war martyr. The dead cannot dispute their reinterpretation; the audience cannot independently verify the DMs. The mechanism is structurally similar to apostolic succession claims. Plausible-Deniability Architecture The shield phrases ('I never said Israel killed Charlie,' 'we don't know, no, but we know,' 'just asking questions') decouple legal exposure from rhetorical effect. The audience receives the claim; the courtroom receives the disclaimer. Persecution-Funded Autonomy Every cease-and-desist letter, every demonetization, every legal threat is monetized within 24 hours via subscription, merch, or pay-per-view. The ECONOMIC gradient on persecution is positive, which means the franchise is structurally incentivized to escalate rather than retreat. Alternative Hypotheses Alternative 1... Pure Financial Grift Hypothesis: the entire operation is a monetization play; ideology is the marketing layer. Supporting evidence: extraordinarily dense sponsor stack; merch tied to every viral moment; explicit subscription paywall; book sold direct to maximize margin; conflict treated as a revenue input. Counter-evidence: she has repeatedly destroyed lucrative platform relationships (Turning Point, Daily Wire) and incurred legal exposure (Macron lawsuit, threats from public officials) that pure financial maximization would avoid. A strict grifter would moderate when controversy threatened revenue; she escalates because escalation IS the revenue strategy. Pure grift is therefore too narrow... it explains the cash flow but not the consistent ideological architecture or the institutional positioning around Catholicism, Kirk's succession, and dissident-right movement-building. Confidence this is the primary goal: LOW. Alternative 2... Genuine Religious / Ideological Awakening Hypothesis: she sincerely believes what she says; the Catholic conversion, the spiritual-war framing, and the Israel critique are authentic convictions she is following at personal cost. Supporting evidence: consistency of theological framing across years; willingness to absorb financial and legal cost; specificity of her Catholic identity claims; the personal religious turn appears across both monologue and unscripted interview moments. Counter-evidence: the seamless fusion of theology with merchandise ('I told my priest I would chill' as a sweatshirt; 'Battle Bun' as a confrontation signal); the strategic enemy migration that always tracks audience disillusionment rather than doctrinal conviction; the omission of Catholic doctrinal teachings inconvenient to the franchise (calumny, Nostra Aetate); the recombinant nature of her claims (Frankism, Crowley, Khazars, NASA-as-occult, Dionysus-and-Brigitte) suggests post-hoc theological framing of pre-decided positions. Sincere conviction would not require the merchandise integration or the shield phrases. Confidence: MODERATE... sincerity is plausibly present, but it is not the OPERATIONAL goal; it is a feature of the goal's execution. Alternative 3... Personal Vendetta Against Daily Wire / Shapiro Hypothesis: the entire post-2024 operation is downstream of her firing from the Daily Wire and her conflict with Ben Shapiro; everything else is collateral. Supporting evidence: extensive direct attacks on Jeremy Boring and Shapiro; reframing of the firing as martyrdom; legal escalation ('I just live subpoenaed myself'); 'angry, repressed homosexual' attacks on Boring; structural similarity between her current network and a counter-Daily-Wire. Counter-evidence: her primary content focus by volume (Israel, then Charlie Kirk, then Macron) is broader than the Daily Wire vendetta; many of her current attacks pre-date or post-date the firing window; her enemy migration continues past the original target. The vendetta is real but is downstream of, not the cause of, the broader movement-capture goal. Confidence: LOW as a primary goal, MODERATE as a contributing accelerant.

English
54
165
440
39K
Ethel Frilot retweetledi
Dinesh D'Souza
Dinesh D'Souza@DineshDSouza·
This is what Aristotle in his Poetics calls ANAGNORISIS which is a moment of crucial dramatic RECOGNITION. In Tucker’s case, it is SELF-RECOGNITION, like the man who looks at himself in the mirror and says, “There’s a lunatic if I ever saw one.”
Ally@AllyJKiss

Found it! The one truthful statement Tucker Carlson made during the entire NYT interview: “You know, I have a lot of thoughts and theories about things which, you know, may or may not be rooted in reality so I hesitate even to spring any of my theories on you because, like, they're probably insane.”

English
33
78
315
43K
Ethel Frilot
Ethel Frilot@EthelFrilot·
@JaimeeUSA Is it just me, or does it sound just like what Candace does? It's the same thing???
English
0
0
0
2
Jaimee Michell
Jaimee Michell@JaimeeUSA·
This is Tuckiyya 101: 1. Say something abhorrent. 2. Deny you said it when asked. 3. Proof you said it is revealed. 4. Claim you don’t know what it even means. Is it any wonder why the low IQ third world has flocked to his show?
English
93
369
2.9K
39.8K
Ethel Frilot retweetledi
Ethel Frilot
Ethel Frilot@EthelFrilot·
@JennMGreenberg Wondering... does he have the same speech writers as Candace...asking for a friend. He sounds very Candace Esq...
English
0
0
0
4
Ethel Frilot retweetledi
Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit
If you still can't figure out the play Tucker was engaged, getting close to Charlie, then sucking up to the Woke Right the minute Charlie was out of the picture... ...you're either stupid or you're playing stupid.
Richard Hanania@RichardHanania

Tucker: I wanted to talk to Fuentes to see what he thought about the war with Iran. He interviewed Fuentes months before that. Tucker lies like most people breathe. I wouldn’t be surprised if he actually convinced himself this is true.

English
18
59
159
6.4K
Ethel Frilot retweetledi
John Podhoretz
John Podhoretz@jpodhoretz·
Tucker spent 8 years on Fox reading written monologues off a teleprompter. The world is now learning just what a casual liar he is. Comes by it honestly. His father was one of the most astounding pathological liars I’ve ever known.
English
311
381
3.5K
251.7K
Ethel Frilot
Ethel Frilot@EthelFrilot·
@DineshDSouza Perhaps he needs to lay off the nicotine,,, Side effects can cause paranoia, and other psychotic experiences... just sayin.
English
0
0
0
10
Ethel Frilot retweetledi
Dinesh D'Souza
Dinesh D'Souza@DineshDSouza·
He sort of has this feeling. It’s hard to shake. It’s not backed up by anything. But it’s a feeling nonetheless. Traitors are everywhere! Somehow, he just knows, even if has no idea who they are, even if he can’t name a single one.
Joel Berry@JoelWBerry

Tucker: “This is well known that people are doing this.” NYT: “Who? Who specifically?” Tucker: “I don’t know, but they are.” NYT: “Who’s ‘they?’” Tucker: “I don’t know. You can say what you think you know, but it’s hard to really know.” 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡

English
301
402
1.9K
62.9K
Ethel Frilot
Ethel Frilot@EthelFrilot·
@DineshDSouza sounds very familiar, puts me in mind of Candace...A feeeeellliinngg...
English
0
0
0
4
Ethel Frilot retweetledi
Ambassador Mike Huckabee
Ambassador Mike Huckabee@GovMikeHuckabee·
The NYT did extensive intvu w/ Tucker Carlson-& questions were legit & professional. In it, Tucker accused me of advocating for killing of children & civilians. Asked to respond, I sent the following. (In fairness, NYT couldn't use all), but here it is: “Poor Tucker needs help.  He’s clearly circling the drain by saying something so outrageous.  No sane person “advocates” for the murder of children or civilians.  Even the allegation is sick and evil. Tucker  apparently limits his compassion to the unfortunate souls who have died in Gaza as a result of the stubbornness of Hamas to release hostages and who murdered their own citizens and intentionally put them in front of military assets where they would be most likely to become victims of the war.  One never hears Tucker lament the massacre and mutilation of 1200 women, babies, and elderly people butchered by Hamas on October 7 or the torture, rape and starvation of the 251 hostages taken and held by Hamas.  I am heartbroken by the slaughter of innocent civilians wherever they are and whoever they are.  Tucker’s irrational hatred of Jews in general and Israel in particular blinds him to the horrific savagery inflicted upon the victims of October 7, including the rape of women in front of their children, the beheading of babies in the presence of their mothers, or setting fire to elderly people who sat in wheelchairs and were burned alive, all of which were captured on video taken by Hamas terrorists who were so proud of their despicable acts that they wore Go-Pro cameras to record it as if they were taking movies of a dance recital.  Tucker’s contempt of President Trump is just another instance in which the Tucker Carlson I once knew has become someone unrecognizable.  I pray he finds himself and God.  He has become a very angry and bitter man and it’s truly tragic to watch.”
English
1.7K
2.2K
10.3K
688.9K
Ethel Frilot
Ethel Frilot@EthelFrilot·
Perhaps it is the spirit in Carlson that hates the changes that President Trump is making to restore Christian values in America. Evil always hates good. And seeks to destroy it. So who does the bible say is the father of lies [Liars], the evil one, Satan. You shall know them by their fruit.
English
0
0
0
61
Ethel Frilot retweetledi
Mark R. Levin
Mark R. Levin@marklevinshow·
Folks, Carlson is, in my opinion, mentally ill. That’s the explanation.  Not complicated.  What he says.  Incessant lying and conspiracies. Obsessive hatred of Israel and Jews. His speech pattern and odd rambling. Strange cackling. Wild mood swings.  And all the rest.
Ally@AllyJKiss

Tucker tells the NYT that President Trump puts a literal “spell” on people to “weaken them and make them compliant” and it might be “supernatural.” 🤡

English
3K
1.9K
9.6K
470.4K
Ethel Frilot retweetledi
Johnny Midnight ⚡️
Johnny Midnight ⚡️@its_The_Dr·
WOW. I quit watching Tucker for some time now, I started hearing things that made me think he was bought and paid for by a foreign entity and never heard anything like what he was saying before! Now here Tucker is lying about what he said. It’s on video.
English
117
351
1.6K
37.6K
Ethel Frilot retweetledi
Tironianae 🍊🍊 Z. - Ultra Verbum Vincet
🚨 BREAKING: President Trump says NO MORE SOMALIANS in the USA. He's DONE. "Their country STINKS! They contribute NOTHING." 💯 "I don't want 'em, to be honest. OK? Some say, that's not politically correct. I DON'T CARE. I don't want them in our country. Their country's no good for a reason!" "I'm understanding Somalians ripped Minnesota that place for BILLIONS of dollars! And they contribute NOTHING. The welfare's like 88%!" "I always watch [Ilhan Omar] complain about our Constitution, how she's treated 'badly,' or it's a bad place, hates Jewish people, hate's everybody. She's a TERRIBLE person." "I watch what's happening in Minnesota, the land of a thousand lakes? This beautiful place, I see these people RIPPING it off."
English
1.3K
11.9K
65.2K
1.9M
Ethel Frilot retweetledi
X22 Report
X22 Report@X22Report·
Powell isn't staying on the Fed board because he wants to. He's taking MARCHING ORDERS from Team Obama. Their mission is to use monetary policies to intentionally keep the economy reined in so Trump can’t have a hot economy. The Democrats are more than willing to make America SUFFER just to hurt Trump.
English
157
1.9K
4.8K
44K