EuropeanWorldUnion

@NationalistNN Someone get Finck in here.

Neo-Pagans are jew~ish. change my mind x.com/i/spaces/1nxeL…

@NationalistNN He just mistook Joseph son of Jacob with Joseph father of Jesus!

@NationalistNN Please, this is a disgusting, obviously White hating, sandnigger, kick this shit.

@NationalistNN Which ones were the “Gates” opened by the jews in the middle east to bring the arabs?

@1mreallyher @chb2xx Couldn’t tell since you guys were talking about peanut butter.

@EuropeanNaOrder @chb2xx no

@Eyes4theProfane @NationalistNN I was just kidding. I was joking about the chick that keeps saying to not be mean.

@EuropeanNaOrder @NationalistNN Subversives and Jews are dangerous to our people, mein volk.

No Juice, only RAW MILK x.com/i/spaces/1jGXg…

@ISISGIRL1488 @NationalistNN You too.

@EuropeanNaOrder @NationalistNN he is dumb it needed to happen

@ISISGIRL1488 @NationalistNN Its mean to kick people.

@EuropeanNaOrder @NationalistNN Ur mean

@ISISGIRL1488 @NationalistNN Dont say mean things.😭

@EuropeanNaOrder @NationalistNN a lot of stuff

@ISISGIRL1488 @NationalistNN What do you even talk about in our spaces?

@EuropeanNaOrder @NationalistNN when did that come into rule? That’s not even true plewse abide by my bio cute and lovable stop

@ISISGIRL1488 @NationalistNN He should kick you too.

@EuropeanNaOrder @NationalistNN Don’t say that

@Boochibooch When I saw that post, I remembered about this “White woman tears” and to kill a mockingbird from you account. Thats why I commented it. Truly disgusting. Makes you wonder if White women are being attacked and demoralized as much as White men. Sad.

If White men protect White women, they're "enforcing White supremacy," and if White women seek protection, they're using "White women's tears," to harm Black men. Stigma-based solidarity theory is just hyper sophisticated racial warfare, and the brainwashing starts early.

@ignatzbernotas Is there somewhere to see what nswp is about?

⚡️✋🏻⚡️ NSWP is everywhere!

@NationalistNN Kick this nigger, please.

Anti-Abrahamic means you´re jewish x.com/i/spaces/1vJpP…

@Pronatalism A big responsibility, I assume.

It’s very satisfying to know that as a parent, you get to set the scenes in which your children’s earliest memories are formed.

@JournoMaddie @DEI4WhiteGuys To Kill a Mockingbird…

White girls grow up being told we have a duty to protect black men from the law because they’re oppressed and we’re the oppressors. Even if they’re career criminals and we’re their victims. This brainwashing is evil. Black male criminals are not victims. It’s ridiculous we even have to state this. We’re going to need a serious deradicalisation programme if we ever want to have fair justice systems which appropriately punish criminals and protect the public again.

@christogenea I was wondering while reading. So, whenever they mention arabs, are they mentioning the arabs that we refer to today, or was it just canaanites that were southern into the beginnings of the arabian desert?

@EuropeanNaOrder So at least a number of the people we know as Edomite or Ishmaelite or Canaanite from the books of Moses, by the 2nd century were among those who had come to be called "arabs".

Concerning the words Judaean and Jewish, all lexicons are “jewed” on these words, and they always have been. Christians have been jewed because from Roman times, they were never properly educated on the internal history of Judaea from 450 BC to 70 AD, so the consequences of the mass conversion of Edomites and other aliens from 160 years before the ministry of Christ had never been considered. Ἰουδαῖος is a Judaean. When the Greeks first began using the term, the people in Jerusalem and the related people who settled in other towns in the area after the return from Babylon were ethnically descendants of the people of the ancient Kingdom of Judah, so the term had an ethnic meaning. Ἰουδαϊκῶς is an adverb describing something belonging to a Ἰουδαῖος, which could be a reference to ethnicity, customs, law or religion, depending on the context. From circa 130 BC to 76 BC all of the Edomites, Canaanites, or at the time, Arabs, and others who lived in the ancient territory of Israel and Judah had been forcibly converted to the laws and customs of the Judaeans, and to Greeks and Romans who knew little or nothing of the differences in ethnicity in Judaea, they were all Judaeans. But with a high degree of intermarriage between the different ethnic groups of Judaea in the many decades before the ministry of Christ, the word Ἰουδαῖος had little meaning in reference to ethnicity. Josephus records that Edomites (Idumaeans) were the dominant group defending Jerusalem from the Romans, and after 70 AD, their use of Idumaean to describe themselves faded, and they identified as Judaeans. This was described by historians Strabo of Cappadocia and Ptolemy of Ascalon, and also on several occasions in the New Testament. It should not be hard to see. But too many people keep clouding this issue, on account of Jewish agendas. But even today, jews themselves argue over what is an ethnic jew, count lineage through their mothers, convert proselytes of all nations into full fledged jews. They never cared about their ethnicity, because they were never true children of Judah. The true descendants of Israel followed Christ, as He Himself had said, and lost their identity as Judaeans, having become Christians. Modern jews are not Israelites, and they never were Israelites. This was literally a historical bait-and-switch.