Evan 🇺🇸🇮🇹

@kerwin65230 @StatisticUrban I don’t see how changing the number of house members helps the fact that the Senate isn’t representative of the population?

@StatisticUrban This will not change. We need to eliminate the cap on house members.

Each of these colors are about 1/3 of the US population. - The purple group has 8 senators (4D-4R) - The green group has 28 senators (19D-9R) - The orange group has 64 senators for just a third of the population (24D-40R)

@meawoppl @jetpackjoe_ Looks like roughly 71 (that meet the standard of participating within the Partnership for Public Service, which is a standard I made up). bestplacestowork.org/all-agencies/

@jetpackjoe_ Interesting. What is the right number?

@barrymc0ckner @jasonjoyride Why are you spamming so much? Why are you so afraid to explain why there were no black people hired prior to those programs, with several after? And explain why other tech companies then saw no increase.

@EvanRoden5 @jasonjoyride

Bell Labs in the 1900s was INSANE. They invented: ‣ Lasers ‣ Vacuum tubes and transistors ‣ Solar cells ‣ Cellular networks ‣ The 1st communications satellite ‣ The C and C++ programming language ‣ Claude Shannon's information theory And so much more...

@barrymc0ckner @jasonjoyride As long as you'll keep trying to spam, answer this: why are you so afraid to explain why there were no black people hired prior to those programs, with several after? And explain why other tech companies then saw no increase.

@EvanRoden5 @jasonjoyride

@barrymc0ckner @jasonjoyride God, you've really got no idea how to stand up for your claims. Why are you so afraid to explain why there were no black people hired prior to those programs, with several after? And explain why other tech companies then saw no increase.

@EvanRoden5 @jasonjoyride

@barrymc0ckner @jasonjoyride Learn to crop, loser. Why are you so afraid to explain why there were no black people hired prior to those programs, with several after? And explain why other tech companies then saw no increase.

@EvanRoden5 @jasonjoyride

@barrymc0ckner @jasonjoyride We’ve already established reality, but we both know you can’t explain it because you’re racist. You’re so afraid to explain why there were no black people hired prior to those programs, with several after. And explain why other tech companies then saw no increase.

@EvanRoden5 @jasonjoyride I don’t need to explain things that you make up

@barrymc0ckner @jasonjoyride So then why are you afraid to explain why there were no black people hired prior to those programs, w several after? And explain why other tech companies then saw no increase.

@EvanRoden5 @jasonjoyride Hawkins wasn’t hired due to DEI

@barrymc0ckner @jasonjoyride Is your reading comprehension so poor that you can’t remember Bell’s DEI programs mentioned a few hours ago? Why are you afraid to explain why there were no black people hired prior to those programs, w several after? And explain why other tech companies then saw no increase.

@EvanRoden5 @jasonjoyride We did not. Go cry.

@barrymc0ckner @jasonjoyride We’ve discussed several Bell DEI programs, like the CRFO and BLEB. Why are you so afraid to explain why there were no qualified black people hired prior to that push, with several after? Make sure you account for why other tech companies then that didn’t saw no increase.

@EvanRoden5 @jasonjoyride No bot, we haven’t

@barrymc0ckner @jasonjoyride We’ve discussed several Bell programs to hire & retain techs of color. Why are you afraid to explain why there were no qualified black people hired prior to that push, with several after? Make sure you account for why other tech companies then that didn’t saw no increase.

@EvanRoden5 @jasonjoyride Bell didn’t have a DEI push, they hired him because he was qualified numb nuts

@barrymc0ckner @jasonjoyride So feel free to explain why there were no qualified black people hired prior to the DEI push we saw at Bell in the 1940s, but several were hired after. Make sure your explanation accounts for why other tech companies at the time that didn’t have a DEI push saw no such increase.

@EvanRoden5 @jasonjoyride He was hired because he was qualified, not DEI you total dumba$$

@barrymc0ckner @jasonjoyride So feel free to explain why not one qualified black person was hired prior to the DEI push we saw at Bell in the 1940s, but several were hired after. Make sure your explanation accounts for why other tech companies at the time that didn’t have a DEI push saw no such increase.

@EvanRoden5 @jasonjoyride No one said that. And you’re wrong about the broader point - Bell did well innovating because they hired capable people, blue black brown or otherwise it does not matter. The Supreme Court and the electorate have resoundingly rejected DEI, your argument is stale

@barrymc0ckner @jasonjoyride There were zero? Not one?

@EvanRoden5 @jasonjoyride Qualified black folks in science were in fact scarce before the 1940s

@JohnWil18086414 @jasonjoyride Wait, be for real right now, you actually don’t know what published research is, do you?

@JohnWil18086414 @jasonjoyride Seems like someone’s pretty triggered by a basic request for evidence.

@JohnWil18086414 @jasonjoyride Do you think NAEP snapshot reports are “published research”?

@barrymc0ckner @jasonjoyride Was he the first qualified black person in America to have a competent father, so that’s why no black person had ever been hired at Bell in a technical role prior? That’s your new claim? You are deeply racist, which we both know is why you hide behind a pseudonym.

@EvanRoden5 @jasonjoyride That’s false. Hawkins father was a lawyer also.

@JohnWil18086414 @jasonjoyride Getting closer! A summary of test score data isn’t published research. I’m beginning to believe that you aren’t a liar; you’re just too dumb to recognize that your racism isn’t based in reality.

@JohnWil18086414 @jasonjoyride Do you not know what “published research” is or are you hoping your lies wouldn’t be noticed?