Evening Trader Group

x.com/i/article/2027…

Bitcoin → Ethereum → $TAO next? Top 10 bluechip potential? Every major cycle in crypto has been defined by a new primitive. Bitcoin introduced decentralized money. Ethereum expanded that into programmable systems and decentralized applications. But both still rely on a key assumption. The underlying infrastructure, especially compute, remains largely centralized. Now we may be witnessing the early stages of a new shift. From decentralizing money, to decentralizing applications, to decentralizing intelligence itself. $TAO (@opentensor) sits directly at that frontier. Recent developments are starting to validate that this is no longer just a niche idea. A 72B parameter model has been trained across more than 70 contributors, using open and distributed internet infrastructure. No centralized data center. No hyperscaler dominance. No single entity controlling the training process. This matters more than it seems. Because in the current AI landscape, control over compute is everything. Whoever owns the GPUs controls the models. Whoever controls the models captures the majority of the value. That is why today’s AI stack is heavily concentrated in the hands of a few large players. $TAO challenges that structure at the root level. It distributes compute, opens participation, and aligns incentives across contributors instead of centralizing them. This is not just a product iteration. It is an attempt to redesign how intelligence is produced and owned. That is also why the narrative is starting to move beyond crypto-native circles. When figures like @chamath discuss decentralized AI training in the same context as @nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, it signals that the idea is entering a broader conversation. Not because of hype. But because the architecture itself challenges the current AI monopoly. Most #AI tokens today are built on top of centralized infrastructure. They rely on APIs, hosted models, or off-chain compute. $TAO is different. It is trying to decentralize the most valuable layer in the stack, which is the training and coordination of intelligence itself. If this works, the implications go far beyond a single token or a narrative cycle. Bitcoin decentralized value. Ethereum decentralized logic. $TAO could be an early attempt at decentralizing intelligence. It is still early. There are challenges ahead. But structurally, this is one of the few projects not just riding a narrative, but attempting to redefine the layer that the narrative depends on. And that is why it is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore.

Bitcoin → Ethereum → $TAO next? Top 10 bluechip potential? Every major cycle in crypto has been defined by a new primitive. Bitcoin introduced decentralized money. Ethereum expanded that into programmable systems and decentralized applications. But both still rely on a key assumption. The underlying infrastructure, especially compute, remains largely centralized. Now we may be witnessing the early stages of a new shift. From decentralizing money, to decentralizing applications, to decentralizing intelligence itself. $TAO (@opentensor) sits directly at that frontier. Recent developments are starting to validate that this is no longer just a niche idea. A 72B parameter model has been trained across more than 70 contributors, using open and distributed internet infrastructure. No centralized data center. No hyperscaler dominance. No single entity controlling the training process. This matters more than it seems. Because in the current AI landscape, control over compute is everything. Whoever owns the GPUs controls the models. Whoever controls the models captures the majority of the value. That is why today’s AI stack is heavily concentrated in the hands of a few large players. $TAO challenges that structure at the root level. It distributes compute, opens participation, and aligns incentives across contributors instead of centralizing them. This is not just a product iteration. It is an attempt to redesign how intelligence is produced and owned. That is also why the narrative is starting to move beyond crypto-native circles. When figures like @chamath discuss decentralized AI training in the same context as @nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, it signals that the idea is entering a broader conversation. Not because of hype. But because the architecture itself challenges the current AI monopoly. Most #AI tokens today are built on top of centralized infrastructure. They rely on APIs, hosted models, or off-chain compute. $TAO is different. It is trying to decentralize the most valuable layer in the stack, which is the training and coordination of intelligence itself. If this works, the implications go far beyond a single token or a narrative cycle. Bitcoin decentralized value. Ethereum decentralized logic. $TAO could be an early attempt at decentralizing intelligence. It is still early. There are challenges ahead. But structurally, this is one of the few projects not just riding a narrative, but attempting to redefine the layer that the narrative depends on. And that is why it is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore.

Bitcoin → Ethereum → $TAO next? Top 10 bluechip potential? Every major cycle in crypto has been defined by a new primitive. Bitcoin introduced decentralized money. Ethereum expanded that into programmable systems and decentralized applications. But both still rely on a key assumption. The underlying infrastructure, especially compute, remains largely centralized. Now we may be witnessing the early stages of a new shift. From decentralizing money, to decentralizing applications, to decentralizing intelligence itself. $TAO (@opentensor) sits directly at that frontier. Recent developments are starting to validate that this is no longer just a niche idea. A 72B parameter model has been trained across more than 70 contributors, using open and distributed internet infrastructure. No centralized data center. No hyperscaler dominance. No single entity controlling the training process. This matters more than it seems. Because in the current AI landscape, control over compute is everything. Whoever owns the GPUs controls the models. Whoever controls the models captures the majority of the value. That is why today’s AI stack is heavily concentrated in the hands of a few large players. $TAO challenges that structure at the root level. It distributes compute, opens participation, and aligns incentives across contributors instead of centralizing them. This is not just a product iteration. It is an attempt to redesign how intelligence is produced and owned. That is also why the narrative is starting to move beyond crypto-native circles. When figures like @chamath discuss decentralized AI training in the same context as @nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, it signals that the idea is entering a broader conversation. Not because of hype. But because the architecture itself challenges the current AI monopoly. Most #AI tokens today are built on top of centralized infrastructure. They rely on APIs, hosted models, or off-chain compute. $TAO is different. It is trying to decentralize the most valuable layer in the stack, which is the training and coordination of intelligence itself. If this works, the implications go far beyond a single token or a narrative cycle. Bitcoin decentralized value. Ethereum decentralized logic. $TAO could be an early attempt at decentralizing intelligence. It is still early. There are challenges ahead. But structurally, this is one of the few projects not just riding a narrative, but attempting to redefine the layer that the narrative depends on. And that is why it is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore.

Bitcoin → Ethereum → $TAO next? Top 10 bluechip potential? Every major cycle in crypto has been defined by a new primitive. Bitcoin introduced decentralized money. Ethereum expanded that into programmable systems and decentralized applications. But both still rely on a key assumption. The underlying infrastructure, especially compute, remains largely centralized. Now we may be witnessing the early stages of a new shift. From decentralizing money, to decentralizing applications, to decentralizing intelligence itself. $TAO (@opentensor) sits directly at that frontier. Recent developments are starting to validate that this is no longer just a niche idea. A 72B parameter model has been trained across more than 70 contributors, using open and distributed internet infrastructure. No centralized data center. No hyperscaler dominance. No single entity controlling the training process. This matters more than it seems. Because in the current AI landscape, control over compute is everything. Whoever owns the GPUs controls the models. Whoever controls the models captures the majority of the value. That is why today’s AI stack is heavily concentrated in the hands of a few large players. $TAO challenges that structure at the root level. It distributes compute, opens participation, and aligns incentives across contributors instead of centralizing them. This is not just a product iteration. It is an attempt to redesign how intelligence is produced and owned. That is also why the narrative is starting to move beyond crypto-native circles. When figures like @chamath discuss decentralized AI training in the same context as @nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, it signals that the idea is entering a broader conversation. Not because of hype. But because the architecture itself challenges the current AI monopoly. Most #AI tokens today are built on top of centralized infrastructure. They rely on APIs, hosted models, or off-chain compute. $TAO is different. It is trying to decentralize the most valuable layer in the stack, which is the training and coordination of intelligence itself. If this works, the implications go far beyond a single token or a narrative cycle. Bitcoin decentralized value. Ethereum decentralized logic. $TAO could be an early attempt at decentralizing intelligence. It is still early. There are challenges ahead. But structurally, this is one of the few projects not just riding a narrative, but attempting to redefine the layer that the narrative depends on. And that is why it is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore.

Bitcoin → Ethereum → $TAO next? Top 10 bluechip potential? Every major cycle in crypto has been defined by a new primitive. Bitcoin introduced decentralized money. Ethereum expanded that into programmable systems and decentralized applications. But both still rely on a key assumption. The underlying infrastructure, especially compute, remains largely centralized. Now we may be witnessing the early stages of a new shift. From decentralizing money, to decentralizing applications, to decentralizing intelligence itself. $TAO (@opentensor) sits directly at that frontier. Recent developments are starting to validate that this is no longer just a niche idea. A 72B parameter model has been trained across more than 70 contributors, using open and distributed internet infrastructure. No centralized data center. No hyperscaler dominance. No single entity controlling the training process. This matters more than it seems. Because in the current AI landscape, control over compute is everything. Whoever owns the GPUs controls the models. Whoever controls the models captures the majority of the value. That is why today’s AI stack is heavily concentrated in the hands of a few large players. $TAO challenges that structure at the root level. It distributes compute, opens participation, and aligns incentives across contributors instead of centralizing them. This is not just a product iteration. It is an attempt to redesign how intelligence is produced and owned. That is also why the narrative is starting to move beyond crypto-native circles. When figures like @chamath discuss decentralized AI training in the same context as @nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, it signals that the idea is entering a broader conversation. Not because of hype. But because the architecture itself challenges the current AI monopoly. Most #AI tokens today are built on top of centralized infrastructure. They rely on APIs, hosted models, or off-chain compute. $TAO is different. It is trying to decentralize the most valuable layer in the stack, which is the training and coordination of intelligence itself. If this works, the implications go far beyond a single token or a narrative cycle. Bitcoin decentralized value. Ethereum decentralized logic. $TAO could be an early attempt at decentralizing intelligence. It is still early. There are challenges ahead. But structurally, this is one of the few projects not just riding a narrative, but attempting to redefine the layer that the narrative depends on. And that is why it is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore.

Bitcoin → Ethereum → $TAO next? Top 10 bluechip potential? Every major cycle in crypto has been defined by a new primitive. Bitcoin introduced decentralized money. Ethereum expanded that into programmable systems and decentralized applications. But both still rely on a key assumption. The underlying infrastructure, especially compute, remains largely centralized. Now we may be witnessing the early stages of a new shift. From decentralizing money, to decentralizing applications, to decentralizing intelligence itself. $TAO (@opentensor) sits directly at that frontier. Recent developments are starting to validate that this is no longer just a niche idea. A 72B parameter model has been trained across more than 70 contributors, using open and distributed internet infrastructure. No centralized data center. No hyperscaler dominance. No single entity controlling the training process. This matters more than it seems. Because in the current AI landscape, control over compute is everything. Whoever owns the GPUs controls the models. Whoever controls the models captures the majority of the value. That is why today’s AI stack is heavily concentrated in the hands of a few large players. $TAO challenges that structure at the root level. It distributes compute, opens participation, and aligns incentives across contributors instead of centralizing them. This is not just a product iteration. It is an attempt to redesign how intelligence is produced and owned. That is also why the narrative is starting to move beyond crypto-native circles. When figures like @chamath discuss decentralized AI training in the same context as @nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, it signals that the idea is entering a broader conversation. Not because of hype. But because the architecture itself challenges the current AI monopoly. Most #AI tokens today are built on top of centralized infrastructure. They rely on APIs, hosted models, or off-chain compute. $TAO is different. It is trying to decentralize the most valuable layer in the stack, which is the training and coordination of intelligence itself. If this works, the implications go far beyond a single token or a narrative cycle. Bitcoin decentralized value. Ethereum decentralized logic. $TAO could be an early attempt at decentralizing intelligence. It is still early. There are challenges ahead. But structurally, this is one of the few projects not just riding a narrative, but attempting to redefine the layer that the narrative depends on. And that is why it is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore.

On the @theallinpod this week, @chamath asked @nvidia CEO Jensen Huang about decentralized AI training, calling our Covenant-72B run "a pretty crazy technical accomplishment." One correction: it's 72 billion parameters, not four. Trained permissionlessly across 70+ contributors on commodity internet. The largest model ever pre-trained on fully decentralized infrastructure. Jensen's answer is worth hearing too.

$WLFI | Team-Linked Wallets from @worldlibertyfi Continue Distribution Team-linked wallets from @worldlibertyfi are still actively sending $WLFI to exchanges. Around 11 hours ago, a new deposit was detected: 135M $WLFI (~$12.52M) sent to Binance This ongoing unlock + distribution trend has been in play since Jan 11, when $WLFI was trading around $0.18. Since then, price has halved and is now grinding near lows. What’s concerning is the clear divergence between: - Strong marketing / high-profile backing - vs. actual on-chain behavior showing continuous sell-side pressure A heavily promoted project, fully listed on major CEXs, yet team-related flows continue to hit the market. Address: 0xFef30c262676dE9AF5e5E9Ba999cF774000b14B4

$WLFI | Team-Linked Wallets from @worldlibertyfi Continue Distribution Team-linked wallets from @worldlibertyfi are still actively sending $WLFI to exchanges. Around 11 hours ago, a new deposit was detected: 135M $WLFI (~$12.52M) sent to Binance This ongoing unlock + distribution trend has been in play since Jan 11, when $WLFI was trading around $0.18. Since then, price has halved and is now grinding near lows. What’s concerning is the clear divergence between: - Strong marketing / high-profile backing - vs. actual on-chain behavior showing continuous sell-side pressure A heavily promoted project, fully listed on major CEXs, yet team-related flows continue to hit the market. Address: 0xFef30c262676dE9AF5e5E9Ba999cF774000b14B4

$FAI | Insider-Controlled Supply Detected $FAI (@freysa_ai) on @base is showing a notable on-chain structure. A cluster of 86 wallets including early buyers + fresh wallets has accumulated and now controls ~60% of circulating supply. Total holdings: 4,947,085,503.74 $FAI (~$33.72M) This level of concentration suggests strong insider positioning and supply control. At the same time, public figure @krybharat recently accumulated: 25.01M $FAI (~$171.69K) Avg entry: ~$0.00721 With AI Agents continuing to gain traction and supply being tightly held, $FAI is shaping up as an interesting structure to watch closely. Data @nansen_ai

$FAI | Insider-Controlled Supply Detected $FAI (@freysa_ai) on @base is showing a notable on-chain structure. A cluster of 86 wallets including early buyers + fresh wallets has accumulated and now controls ~60% of circulating supply. Total holdings: 4,947,085,503.74 $FAI (~$33.72M) This level of concentration suggests strong insider positioning and supply control. At the same time, public figure @krybharat recently accumulated: 25.01M $FAI (~$171.69K) Avg entry: ~$0.00721 With AI Agents continuing to gain traction and supply being tightly held, $FAI is shaping up as an interesting structure to watch closely. Data @nansen_ai

$FAI | Insider-Controlled Supply Detected $FAI (@freysa_ai) on @base is showing a notable on-chain structure. A cluster of 86 wallets including early buyers + fresh wallets has accumulated and now controls ~60% of circulating supply. Total holdings: 4,947,085,503.74 $FAI (~$33.72M) This level of concentration suggests strong insider positioning and supply control. At the same time, public figure @krybharat recently accumulated: 25.01M $FAI (~$171.69K) Avg entry: ~$0.00721 With AI Agents continuing to gain traction and supply being tightly held, $FAI is shaping up as an interesting structure to watch closely. Data @nansen_ai

$FAI | Insider-Controlled Supply Detected $FAI (@freysa_ai) on @base is showing a notable on-chain structure. A cluster of 86 wallets including early buyers + fresh wallets has accumulated and now controls ~60% of circulating supply. Total holdings: 4,947,085,503.74 $FAI (~$33.72M) This level of concentration suggests strong insider positioning and supply control. At the same time, public figure @krybharat recently accumulated: 25.01M $FAI (~$171.69K) Avg entry: ~$0.00721 With AI Agents continuing to gain traction and supply being tightly held, $FAI is shaping up as an interesting structure to watch closely. Data @nansen_ai

I've said all year: AI agents are the meta. The market is starting to agree. $FAI just went from $11M → $55M in 5 days. That's what happens when you ship real infra.👌 ml.ink by @freysa_ai: → Agents deploy frontend + backend autonomously → One MCP server handles everything → x402 payments via Base incoming → Works with Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw The autonomous economy is being built on @base. Right now.

$FAI | Insider-Controlled Supply Detected $FAI (@freysa_ai) on @base is showing a notable on-chain structure. A cluster of 86 wallets including early buyers + fresh wallets has accumulated and now controls ~60% of circulating supply. Total holdings: 4,947,085,503.74 $FAI (~$33.72M) This level of concentration suggests strong insider positioning and supply control. At the same time, public figure @krybharat recently accumulated: 25.01M $FAI (~$171.69K) Avg entry: ~$0.00721 With AI Agents continuing to gain traction and supply being tightly held, $FAI is shaping up as an interesting structure to watch closely. Data @nansen_ai

$FAI | Insider-Controlled Supply Detected $FAI (@freysa_ai) on @base is showing a notable on-chain structure. A cluster of 86 wallets including early buyers + fresh wallets has accumulated and now controls ~60% of circulating supply. Total holdings: 4,947,085,503.74 $FAI (~$33.72M) This level of concentration suggests strong insider positioning and supply control. At the same time, public figure @krybharat recently accumulated: 25.01M $FAI (~$171.69K) Avg entry: ~$0.00721 With AI Agents continuing to gain traction and supply being tightly held, $FAI is shaping up as an interesting structure to watch closely. Data @nansen_ai

Public figure holdings in $FAI just spiked 12.1% in 24h on @base But it's not a crowd move. One public figure - Bharat Krymo - built the entire 25M position this month 7.9M added yesterday alone in a single $53.5k buy Holder count actually dropped from 7 to 5 while the balance climbed