Nick

@_CedarSteve @CedarDAO I would strongly support your proposals @_CedarSteve! Just how do we get Shawnte to run the vote though? Its clearly against her own personal interests(which seems to drive her actions) so she will resist it like she has done with the other previous legitimate calls for a vote.

Cedar Community The @cedardao is so far off track and there is no signs that will change anytime soon. We desperately need help to get the CedarDAO fully functional without delay.

@CedarDAO @_CedarSteve @RealShawnte @RealShawnte what you're saying really takes a fishknife to the spirit of the proposal doesn't it? Well and truely gutted it!

The proposal does not state that individuals must be voted on to leave on their own, voted on to be removed, voted on to be replaced, or that the number of individuals has to be maintained. Legal counsel has confirmed that the first sentence of $1,125 is equal to $4,500 per month and as long as this monthly amount is not exceeded without a vote then there is no legal risk for individuals, the Committee, or the DAO. While you and others will continue to disagree and make false statements, you and others are not the DAO's legal counsel. As long as committee members are clear with counsel and take actions under the advise of counsel then the DAO is protected as well as the Committee as a collective as well as individually. If you would like to engage further on this matter, feel free to unblock Shawnte so that she may be permitted to respond accordingly should she decide to. This is the end of Cedar's responses.

Another day and still no vote to remove @RealShawnte from @CedarDAO This month, almost $2,000 will go to her for managing socials. Money that was never allocated to her by way of a vote by the @CedarDAO community. I’m sure her “lawyer” will say it’s good though 🤣🤣🤣

@SamCKx Sam is completely right @RealShawnte. If you're so sure that the community support you and not Sam then why not hold the vote? You aren't holding the vote because you already know what the outcome will be. So, what is it going to be? Let the community decide or whats the point??

Cedar holders, It is time to reset the direction of this project and be honest about where we are. Over the past ten months the interim committee has burned enormous time, energy and resources while delivering virtually nothing of tangible value to the community. Legal disputes, governance fights, negligence and endless procedural arguments have drained the treasury while the value of the token has collapsed. That reality cannot be ignored. If Cedar is going to survive, we need to dramatically simplify the mission. First, the DAO’s finances must be fully audited. Every ongoing cost should be reviewed and justified. Unnecessary legal expenses, corporate overhead and other drains on the treasury must stop immediately. The past year has shown how quickly these kinds of costs can hollow out a project. Second, the limited resources that remain should be redirected toward the community itself. That means moderation, communication and rebuilding an engaged social presence. The strength of any DAO ultimately comes from the alignment and energy of its holders. Third, we must recognise a hard truth. The idea that our resources could realistically be used to build multiple utilities or products has clearly proven impossible. Those resources have already been drained by more than 50 percent in a very short period of time. What remains must therefore be used carefully and intelligently. The only logical focus now is the one thing that still has real potential: the future value that may come from Atlas Wallet and the role this community can play in supporting it. Cedar should therefore become a focused DAO whose purpose is simple: to organise and mobilise the community in support of Atlas and to maximise the value of that relationship for Cedar holders. Everything else is a distraction. Endless proposals, complex governance experiments and attempts to build additional utilities will achieve nothing except consuming resources we no longer have. Our energy should be directed toward supporting the one asset that still has genuine potential. But none of this can happen while the project remains paralysed by the current governance crisis. The interim committee was given temporary custody of this project with a clear & limited mandate. Instead, over the last ten months that structure has overseen the destruction of more than 90 percent of the value that the former management committee handed into its care. That situation must now be resolved. And finally, I want to address you directly, @RealShawnte. However strongly you feel about the crusade you have been pursuing for the last six+ months, you must understand that this was never the mandate the community gave you when the interim committee was created and token holders elected their representatives. You are fully aware that the overwhelming majority of genuine token holders do not support the path you are taking. You have made your position clear many times. You believe the former management committee appointed when the founder legally transferred operations of the project over to EverGrow Marketing Ltd did not have the authority to make the decisions they made. You believe you now have the right to undo those decisions. You also believe the founder did not have the right to distribute the founder and founding team tokens he was assigned at launch in the way he chose. You have been heard, but there is no logical or legally sound support for the positions you are taking. The community has overwhelmingly rejected your actions. Continuing down this path does not move the project forward. It only prolongs conflict, places you personally at risk, and continues the destruction of value for every holder in this project. So I am asking you to recognise the reality of the situation. For the sake of this community, and for yourself, step down. If you don’t, you will be voted off anyway, but you will have knowingly caused further material damage to token holders, and no doubt drained further community resources without authorisation. And if you genuinely believe that the community supports you and your positions, then the solution is simple; run a DAO vote of no confidence in yourself and allow token holders to decide whether they have confidence in your self-appointed leadership. The tokens you dispute will not be used to vote - you have my word, and if you doubt that, you have the blockchain to confirm after that vote. If the community supports you, the vote will prove it. If they do not, the result will speak for itself. Either way, the decision should belong to the holders, not you. Cedar will rebuild. Many of community that built this project is still here and still believes in its potential. From this position, where our market cap is at all-time low, we can even attract new holders to our community, with a genuine value proposition. But rebuilding cannot begin while one individual holds total control and continues to act in opposition to the clear wishes of the broader community. So please, Shawnte, step aside today and allow governance to be restored with the approval of the holders rather than through unilateral action. From there, what is left of the committee can begin the rebuild. We Are Cedar.

@RealShawnte @nexusfrontiers @frizbme @_CedarSteve @CedarDAO @MariosDemX @CryptoPilotAdam Why don't you allow the DAO to vote on a new committee? Its hardly representative any more is it? If you believe you have the support of the DAO then why wouldn't you?

The DAO's attorney states that as long as compensation overall is within the budget that it's not illegal and does not require a fresh vote. There is no fraud, embezzlement, or anything else illegal going on. If there has been fraud, embezzlement, or any other crime committed it has 100% not been committed by me... That might not be the case for everyone that has ever been involved, however, I definitely will not have this issue to deal with.

CedarDAO Announcement: The CedarDAO Committee announces that @CryptoPilotAdam has resigned from his position on the Committee. Adam has been a valued member of both the Cedar and EverGrow community for many years and has also served as part of the Discord moderation team. We would like to thank him for his service as a member of the first acting CedarDAO Committee and for the time and effort he has contributed to supporting the community. We appreciate the work Adam has put into helping build and maintain the community, and we hope he will continue to remain an active part of it going forward. On behalf of CedarDAO, we wish him nothing but the best.

Today, the Trump administration repealed the endangerment finding: the ruling that served as the basis for limits on tailpipe emissions and power plant rules. Without it, we’ll be less safe, less healthy and less able to fight climate change — all so the fossil fuel industry can make even more money.

The post was vile, disgusting, utterly reprehensible and indefensible. 🤬 The fact that the White House tried to spin it as an “error,” blamed a staffer, deleted it after 12 hours of public outrage, and then had Trump claim he “didn’t see that part” only makes it worse. That is the behavior of people who know exactly how racist it is and still chose to let it fly — until the backlash became too loud even for them to ignore. This isn’t politics. This isn’t “owning the libs.” This is raw, naked racism from the highest office in the land. It is beneath contempt. It is a stain on the presidency. It is an insult to every Black American, every person of conscience, and every generation that fought and bled to drag this country — inch by painful inch — away from the sewer of racial dehumanization. Anyone who defends this, excuses this, minimizes this with “but others got animal memes too,” or pretends this is just another day in the culture war is complicit in normalizing one of the ugliest, most poisonous symbols of white supremacy still in circulation. There is no both-sides here — No witty comeback. There is only shame — deep, burning, historic shame. This post was racist garbage. Full stop. 🛑 ✋🏽 And the fact that it came from the President of the United States in 2026 should make every decent human being furious. 😡

🚨HOLY SHIT: Rep. Jonathan Jackson just HUMILIATED Trump with him standing behind him at the prayer breakfast: "We pray that he would be mindful of the poor and…suffering happening in the families preparing to bury their loved ones in Minneapolis." WOW.

@SamCKx What really boggles my mind is when its said Trump's approval ratings have crashed from the 40s to the 30s.. How can 30%+ of Americans actually still think he is doing a good job and that he's the sort of person they want to get behind??

I honestly can’t hold this in anymore. Donald Trump and Nigel Farage are not aberrations. They are the same project, running in two countries, with the same backers, the same tactics, and the same end goal. Both wrap themselves in flags while looting the country they claim to love. Both posture as champions of “ordinary people” while serving billionaire interests. Both scream about morality, family values, and patriotism while embodying corruption, cruelty, and hypocrisy at a scale that would have ended any serious political career a generation ago. Trump has been found liable for sexual assault. He has a documented history of misogyny, racism, and outright contempt for the rule of law. He is repeatedly linked to Epstein’s circle, praised authoritarian strongmen, undermined democratic institutions, and treated public office like a personal cash machine. Farage plays the same game in a British accent. He gets a free pass despite his proximity to the same toxic networks, the same culture-war opportunism, the same pattern of scandal that would destroy anyone else. Reform isn’t a grassroots movement. It’s a fear-driven marketing operation, propped up by billionaire money, bot-amplified engagement, and relentless misinformation. Immigrants. Minorities. “Woke elites.” Trans people. The EU. The media. There’s always a target, always a threat, always someone to blame. Not because it’s true, but because fear is profitable. Fear keeps people angry, distracted, and voting against their own economic interests. And that’s the real point. While people argue about flags and pronouns, vast amounts of wealth continue to move upwards. Away from workers. Away from public services. Away from communities. Straight into the hands of donors, allies, family members, and friendly corporations. Deregulation. Tax cuts. Asset stripping. Corruption dressed up as populism. The most grotesque part is the hypocrisy. The people who claim to care about faith, family, freedom, and national pride are cheering for men who violate all of it openly. Lying, cheating, assaulting, scapegoating, enriching themselves, and laughing while they do it. This isn’t about left vs right anymore. It’s about whether we’re willing to admit what this actually is. A billionaire-funded con that feeds on fear, corrodes democracy, and treats ordinary people as expendable. If this is what you’re still defending, then stop pretending it’s about values. At least be honest about what you’re supporting.

@GavinNewsom Why do your posts never show up in my feed even though I'm following you but I can't get Elon out of it? There's something dodgy going on to limit your reach

What’s Ben Shapiro hiding?

@SamCKx @grok @elonmusk This is the problem with Grok.

When does it become a genocide?

And in that moment, standing in my kitchen, phone in hand, staring at the rubble, three words filled my body like fire. I hate him. open.substack.com/pub/jojofromje…

@SamCKx This is a pefectly fair system. I'm sure it would easily pass a vote if put forward.

@EvergrowNick It would be via the new rewards dashboard, so would depend on holdings at the time of any distributions.

@SamCKx Maybe we need a revised vote to put this forward as the distribution of rewards was at the core of the origional token. Not to offer it as an option for Cedar is wrong. This vote could apply to similar token allocations given to us in the future as well.

@EvergrowNick It would be a great opportunity to showcase Cedar as a multi-rewards project - distributing as rewards should've been the first vote considered. It's the heart and soul of what we are.

@RepThomasMassie @SpeakerJohnson Action is necessary to ensure that titles of honour reflect appropriate standards of conduct and demonstrate a clear commitment to integrity from the UK Parliament and Government.

@RepThomasMassie @SpeakerJohnson The Titles Deprivation Act 1917 does not apply to this case, necessitating a new Act of Parliament. While Prince Andrew reportedly ceased using the title, his hereditary peerage legally remains.

First the British Ambassador lost his job and now the Prince lost his title. Don’t tell us there’s nothing in the Epstein files. The truth is coming out and we will not give up. Repost this and tag @SpeakerJohnson if you want him to quit delaying the vote. apnews.com/article/prince…

@CedarDAO @AnthonyT2026 I really don't understand why we can't just put Sam's proposal on as an option as a whole as well. There is clearly a lot of support behind it judging by there community response so why can't it be an option along side the others?

@AnthonyT2026 This will be covered in another post, but its on the table

Cedar Dual Proposal: Liquidity Injection Options Thank you to everyone who participated in the recent vote on Proposal #1. The community overwhelmingly chose to decline that path, and we truly appreciate the thoughtful feedback and engagement. To move forward, we’re presenting two updated proposals, Proposal #2 and Proposal #3, which aim to stabilize and strengthen our liquidity. For the sake of fairness and transparency, both proposals will be available for voting simultaneously on Nation, and you are welcome to vote on both. Proposal #2: Solana Rewards Wallet Injection This option injects the full contents of the Solana (New) rewards wallet (391 SOL) and the Solana Ops wallet (354 SOL) into the Cedar AMM pool on Raydium v2. Total Injection: 745 SOL approximately ($138k at current market value) price may fluctuate. Wallets Used: Solana (New) Rewards Wallet (391 SOL) 3o61UvQYoeNUvR3cxESQZTQMLDRXJ2jhsreRjpDZZBvP Solana Ops Wallet (354 SOL) BCR7bYoBt6DRuj6YXZHHDaKxKTGnvbum8zxAfQsWWPPx Note: BSC Ops wallet and legacy rewards remain untouched under this option. Goal: A more robust liquidity pool to help ensure Cedar’s sustainability, while still preserving 100% of the legacy rewards for future use. Note: SOL’s price is subject to market fluctuations. —— Proposal #3: Full Liquidity Plan (Including Legacy Rewards) Proposal 3 builds on Proposal 2 by including funds from the legacy rewards wallet to bring the total liquidity injection to approximately 1,347 Solana. Approximate total market value: $250K, based on the current SOL price. - Same 745 SOL from Proposal 2 - Plus: An additional 602 SOL from the legacy rewards wallet (approximately $112K at the time of this post), bringing the combined total across all three wallets to roughly $250,000, based on the current market price of Solana. This would leave 856 SOL, approximately $159,000 in the legacy rewards wallet. Solana (Legacy) Rewards Wallet BKB8hQSjSm2PJ3hmZg2mAhqDMPfuBEEGEV8gfa1S39y6 Note: BSC Ops wallet remains untouched under this option. Goal: A more robust liquidity pool to help ensure Cedar’s sustainability, while still preserving a sizable portion (58.72%) of legacy rewards for future use. Note: SOL’s price is subject to market fluctuations. —— In the event of a tie, the proposal with the higher voting quorum percentage will be adopted. How to Vote - Both proposals will be live on Nation, using the same simple Yes/No voting format. - There’s no token lock-up, and you can vote on one or both proposals. - Use your dApp browser (e.g. in Phantom) and paste the link. - Tap the menu → Login → Find Proposal #2 and Proposal #3 → Vote! This is your project, and your voice matters. Let’s work together to build a stronger Cedar. Vote Now at Nations: (both proposals) #proposals" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">nation.io/a/cedarDAO#pro…

@CedarDAO Can we have a vote to reinstate @SamCKx ? There have been a lot of ups and downs along the way but I genuinely felt at ease knowing he was at the helm over the years.

It’s time to vote on how we inject liquidity into the Cedar LP. Cedar is moving to an AMM (Raydium v2) to restore trading and provide a more stable, resilient liquidity pool. This vote will be conducted on Nation, which allows for simple yes/no proposals without requiring any token lock-up. You’ll be voting on whether to inject the full 354 SOL from the Solana Ops wallet into the new Cedar AMM liquidity pool. If approved, $CDR will launch with a smaller pool at a lower, market-aligned price of approximately $0.012. Solana Ops Wallet: BCR7bYoBt6DRuj6YXZHHDaKxKTGnvbum8zxAfQsWWPPx This is about setting a stable path forward. Why an AMM? We’re moving to Raydium v2 to restore trading and create a more stable, resilient LP. The AMM model is easier to manage, requires less manual upkeep, and handles volatility better than DLMM. This move follows over $500K in sell pressure that drained the DLMM pool. An AMM gives us a clean reset and a structure we can sustainably build on. Why only 354 Solana? Because it uses previously collected fees held in the Solana Ops wallet, it doesn’t touch rewards or jeopardize critical operational funds. The BSC Ops wallet is reserved for legal, DAO setup, and essential operational expenses. Legacy & new rewards wallets remain untouched for the community. Why not inject more than 354 SOL? Because it’s not necessary, and it’s not responsible. Injecting more funds just to inflate market cap exposes the project to risk. This path focuses on real value, sustainability, and keeping resources where they matter most. Pros of this approach: ✅ Preserves rewards wallets for future distribution ✅ Maintains legal/ops runway ✅ Establishes real price + market cap ✅ AMM = lower risk, stable recovery ✅ 2% LP fees rebuild LP automatically ✅ Healthier entry point for new buyers What about rewards & possible cons? 🔸 The 2% LP Fees won’t be harvested for rewards, they will automatically go straight into the LP to rebuild over time. (This can be subject to change via a future vote) 🔸 Price will be lower to start, but that’s intentional. It reflects where real buyers are. What could happen if we use the majority of funds to seed liquidity? This could leave the project with no remaining operating funds. Resulting in no legal DAO, no legal support, and no structured ownership. In that case, ownership would have to revert to a single entity (CEO), and all care and maintenance would rely entirely on volunteer help. That’s true whether the liquidity stabilizes or not. Before you vote, it’s important you’re fully aware of that potential outcome, as well as the path outlined in our proposal here, which includes clear pros & cons. The goal is sustainability. This is your project, your vote matters! Vote now: #proposals" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">nation.io/a/cedarDAO#pro… How to use Nation Voting Platform - For mobile, be sure to use your wallet’s dApp browser. Copy and paste the voting link into the dApp browser (such as the one built into Phantom or similar wallets). - Tap the menu at the top right and choose Login, this is where you’ll connect your wallet. - Once connected, find the proposal for CedarDAO and click Join. - Scroll down and select Yes or No to cast your vote.