CanadianExMuslim
37K posts

CanadianExMuslim
@ExMuslimAz
Islam allows child marriage, sex slavery and wife beating. Islam also teaches to hate non Muslims especially Jews and Christian. That’s why I left Islam






Suicidal Empathy is not a polite book. It is not written for the salon intellectual who mistakes sensitivity for wisdom, or for the bureaucratic moralist who believes civilisation survives on slogans and therapeutic jargon. Gad Saad writes with the fury of a man watching a culture voluntarily lobotomise itself and unlike most academics, he still possesses enough nerve to say exactly what he sees. The central argument is devastatingly simple: empathy detached from reason becomes self-destructive. A civilisation that cannot distinguish compassion from surrender will eventually consume itself. Saad’s target is not kindness, charity, or human decency. His target is the modern Western habit of elevating emotional signalling above truth, survival, competence, and reality itself. What makes the book effective is that Saad refuses to speak in the anaesthetised language of institutional academia. He writes like someone who escaped genuine authoritarianism, because he did. Born in Lebanon during civil war, he contrasts societies that fought desperately to build stability with Western elites who inherited functioning institutions and now dismantle them out of fashionable guilt. That perspective gives the book moral force. When Saad talks about civilisational fragility, he is not theorising from a faculty lounge. The book’s polemical power comes from its refusal to grant sacred status to fashionable orthodoxies. Immigration policy, identity politics, censorship, radical activism, ideological capture in universities, Saad attacks all of it with a prosecutorial style that many readers will find either exhilarating or intolerable. But even critics will struggle to deny the underlying pattern he identifies: institutions increasingly reward emotional conformity over objective truth. Saad’s greatest strength is his insistence that intentions do not erase consequences. Modern elites, he argues, judge policies by how compassionate they sound rather than by what they produce. A society can bankrupt itself financially, culturally, and morally while still congratulating itself for being “empathetic.” In Saad’s framework, this is not virtue. It is civilisational decadence disguised as morality. There is also something refreshingly unfashionable about the book’s defence of evolutionary psychology and biological reality. At a time when much of public discourse treats human nature as infinitely malleable, Saad reminds readers that reality eventually retaliates against ideological fantasies. You may shame people into silence for a while. You cannot shame biology, incentives, tribalism, or human behavioural patterns out of existence. Critics will accuse the book of excess and sometimes fairly. Saad occasionally pushes arguments past precision into performance. The outrage can become repetitive. The rhetorical hammer rarely leaves his hand. But the excess is inseparable from the book’s purpose. This is not a measured technocratic policy paper. It is an alarm bell. And perhaps that explains why the book resonates. Many readers sense that Western institutions have become strangely incapable of self-preservation, unable to defend standards, borders, merit, or even basic definitions without collapsing into moral panic. Saad gives that anxiety a vocabulary. He argues that a civilisation paralysed by fear of appearing “uncompassionate” eventually loses the will to survive. Whether one agrees with every argument is almost secondary. The real achievement of Suicidal Empathy is that it attacks one of the defining dogmas of modern public life: the assumption that feeling morally righteous is the same thing as being morally right. Saad tears into that illusion with unapologetic force. Few contemporary books are willing to risk social disapproval in pursuit of clarity. Fewer still do it with this much fire. @GadSaad #BookReview #SuicidalEmpathy

Islam: cover up women to not attract men Muslims: let’s cover up our baby girl Why? Because child marriage is allowed in Islam 🤮

Islam: cover up women to not attract men Muslims: let’s cover up our baby girl Why? Because child marriage is allowed in Islam 🤮

Islam: cover up women to not attract men Muslims: let’s cover up our baby girl Why? Because child marriage is allowed in Islam 🤮

Islam: cover up women to not attract men Muslims: let’s cover up our baby girl Why? Because child marriage is allowed in Islam 🤮


Islam: cover up women to not attract men Muslims: let’s cover up our baby girl Why? Because child marriage is allowed in Islam 🤮

Islam: cover up women to not attract men Muslims: let’s cover up our baby girl Why? Because child marriage is allowed in Islam 🤮



