John Wick

@qfint Nice work. Thank you for the data. But can you be kind enough to extrapolate it further & give a column wherein you convert the related strength change into seats as well. So that how 815 divides as per present percentage vs how it will get divided (based 2011) can be compared.

According to media reports, a new constitutional amendment act proposing population based seat adjustment and seat delimitation has been introduced. If 2011 census figures are used as baseline, this is what final seat tally may look like. 1/2

@umashankarsingh वो थोड़ा सा अगर रंजना ओम मोदी....मेरा मतलब कश्यप को भी ये ज्ञान भेज देता अर्नब तो थोड़े दिन शांति रहती लोगों के TV पर । बेचारी रोज़ चीखती रहती है अमरीका को डिफेंड करते हुए /

अमेरिकी राष्ट्रपति ट्रंप को ‘सभ्यता’ की बात सुना कर ईरानी मीडिया में छा गया अर्नब !

@SauravDassss Brilliantly articulated and worded saurav. Though long, definitely worthy of a read for the journalistic bend to the words as he drives you through the topic. What came refreshing was the fact that the piece was written by him (& isn't the AI shit every long post nowadays is).

#ImportantNews: The controversy over the alleged Delhi liquor-scam case before Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma is no longer confined to courtroom conduct alone. Now more troubling questions of proximity, patronage, conflict-of-interest, and the appearance of bias have come to light. Several of the 23 dischargees in the case had formally sought Justice Sharma’s recusal from hearing the CBI’s challenge to their discharge. Even then, the judge has so far resisted calls to step aside, even as former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal himself appears in person to argue the recusal application. Arguments are now scheduled for Monday, 13 April 2026. In my last Case In Point column for @frontline_india, I had already revealed, through an analysis of all the 165 criminal revision petitions of the same category as Kejriwal’s case, that Justice Sharma clearly departed from her usual pattern of handling such matters and had taken an unusually strange interest in this case. That, along with many other details that if read in singularity can be met with a shrug, but when read together, reveals a troubling pattern and credible fears of apprehension of bias in the liquor case. These by itself had raised serious questions. You may read my piece here: frontline.thehindu.com/columns/delhi-… What has surfaced now makes those questions HARDER to dismiss. Justice Sharma’s son and daughter—Ishaan Sharma and Shambhavi Sharma—have both been empanelled by the Union government before the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court. According to the empanelment details, both siblings were appointed on the very same days: 11 September 2025 for the Delhi High Court panels and 21 November 2025 for the Supreme Court panels. 1. Ishaan Sharma holds panels before both courts, including the highest Group A panel before the Supreme Court and Senior Panel Counsel status before the Delhi High Court. 2. Shambhavi Sharma, with mere four years of enrolment as advocate, too holds panels before both courts: Group C before the Supreme Court and Government Pleader before the Delhi High Court. 3. Ishaan Sharma also held a panel in the Delhi Development Authority (DDA), under the Union Housing Ministry, till at least 2024 (Check: sci.gov.in/sci-get-pdf/?d…). 4. He also held a panel in the Delhi State Legal Services Authority since 2021 until at least the end of 2024 (Check: cdnbbsr.s3waas.gov.in/s395b7a6d9a47c…). Panel counselship is among the most coveted forms of government legal patronage in the system. Ask any advocate and they will tell you how through these positions, the government allocates litigation, visibility, professional standing, and income. But the more important and troubling part is that they are positions held at the pleasure of the very government whose top law officers are now appearing before Justice Sharma in one of the most politically explosive cases in the country. And that is where the conflict sharpens. Of course, one need not prove an explicit bargain but justice must also be SEEN to be done, especially when it is a case of public interest. The test for seeking recusal of a judge is whether there exists a reasonable apprehension of bias and whether public confidence in the fairness of the process has been impaired. Like I had explained in my column, Indian law on recusal has long recognised that what matters is not just actual bias, but whether a litigant could REASONABLY FEEL that justice may NOT appear to be done. Here, several of the 23 dischargees feel justice may not be done impartially. And now this issue of one advocate, who happens to be the son of a judge, accumulating large number of panels within a relatively short post-enrolment period as an advocate. Ask any lawyer and they will tell you how many more accomplished, brilliant persons, with many more years as an advocate have failed to secure a panel through the formal process. The concerns are many. In this case, the question is whether a judge can continue to hear a politically sensitive challenge brought by the CBI, while her kin hold multiple Union government panels and receive work from the same legal establishment whose top officers allocate cases to them and are now appearing before her? Note this: as per one RTI reply I received, Ishaan Sharma was allocated 2,487 cases in 2023, 1,784 cases in 2024, and 1,633 cases in 2025. In both 2024 and 2025, he was allocated more case files than even Zoheb Hossain, the top, most publicly visible Enforcement Directorate lawyer—by 91 in 2024 and by 582 in 2025. This of course suggests the sustained and substantial allocation of state work before the son. The allocation is done by the topmost in the legal system. Also, this is not the first time that such questions of potential conflict of interest have arisen. In September 2024, I had highlighted the case of Padmesh Mishra, whose appointments across multiple union government and Rajasthan government positions drew scrutiny after his father, Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra, was elevated to the Supreme Court. Check: x.com/SauravDassss/s… The unease then was the same as it is now: when the children of sitting judges begin to accumulate government panels and positions in unusual concentration, something a regular lawyer, perhaps much more brilliant and of more history of practice, can only dream of, particularly after or around the parent’s rise within the judiciary, the issue is of institutional credibility. And no one really needs to state that that credibility is already under strain. Recently, Justice Manmohan of the Supreme Court himself publicly flagged corruption in the appointment of panel counsels by the Union government, questioning whether such appointments are really being made on merit at all. In a system where even a sitting Supreme Court judge is warning that panel-counsel appointments may be infected by extraneous considerations, the appearance of conflict in the present case becomes still harder to shrug away. Check: x.com/barandbench/st… Seen in that light, the present controversy is again not whether Justice Sharma is actually biased. It is about whether the institution can credibly insist that there is nothing to see here. The CBI has just filed an affidavit supporting Justice Sharma. A judge who I have documented, as per her own orders, to show unusual interest in a politically sensitive matter now finds herself in a position where her own kind hold/held as many as SIX government panels between them, while their bosses continue to appear before her. Even if one were to assume the absence of any actual impropriety, does this arrangement augur well for the appearance of judicial independence, especially in this case? The question is whether this not enough evidence of apprehension of bias that should suffice for a recusal. That is the question the High Court ought to have confronted with seriousness. Instead, by resisting recusal in these circumstances, the judge is unfortunately deepening this very suspicion that it should have avoided at all costs, or at least for the sake of institution.

@sindhiteena सबसे पहले तो bio में sanatani लिख लेना है.....और dp पर एक ब्रा में फोटो डाल देनी है । फिर एक अटपटा लेकिन बेबाक/असभ्य सा सवाल पूछना है । उसके बाद इस खोदू एलोन मस्क के करे खुतियापे की वजह से algorithm इस बकवास ट्वीट को हमारी टाइमलाइन पर ले आएगी और बस तेरी आज की दिहाड़ी पूरी ।

Restricted content dekhne ke liye setting me kya karna padega?

@askbhupi बुरा न मान बावले......लड़की न है वो / ये बेचारे वैसे ही परेशान रहें हैं ताली बजा बजा के, क्यों और दुखी करन लाग रह्य ।।

“हमारी वजह से इनकी रोज़ी-रोटी चलती है…” ये शब्द उस महिला के हैं, जो हरियाणा से आकर अपने पति के साथ ऋषिकेश में गंगा किनारे शराब का सेवन कर रही थी। जब स्थानीय लोगों और पुलिस ने उन्हें रोका, तो वह भड़क उठी और कहने लगी “तुम्हारे पैसों की पी है…”

@sardesairajdeep @nishikant_dubey This & only this monkey balancing and d fkin spineless-ness of rajdeep has prevented him from being the great he deserved to be in Indian media ! This speaking the truth and then coying away d moment someone challenges is d reason why trolls like malviya dubey dare insult him /

आप सही भी हैं और गलत भी @nishikant_dubey ji. सही यह है कि हमें इतिहास से सीखना चाहिए। गलत यह है कि हम इतिहास का इस्तेमाल लोगों को व्यक्तिगत रूप से निशाना बनाने के लिए करते हैं, क्योंकि इससे बिजू पटनायक के हालिया विवाद जैसी घटनाएं हो सकती हैं। कृपया पूरा कार्यक्रम देखें। नमस्कार! @TheLallantop

@NalinisKitchen @ShyamMeeraSingh Oh yes...you are right. He ain't courageous like you. He starts to cry saying.. हाय मैंने तो कुछ भी नहीं किया था, हाय मैं तो बस अपना काम करता हूँ... हाय मैंने तो publically available info. ही बताई थी । अरे मेरा घर कैसे चलेगा, मैं अब कुछ नहीं बोलूंगा, मैं मर गया बर्बाद हो गया ।

@ShyamMeeraSingh Shyam Meera Singh takes down fake video of Sadhguru after Court's order.

I challenge you to make one honest video about what has improved in India in the past 10 years. You do not have the courage to do it because the moment BJP gets any credit, it does not fit your narrative. Even I criticize the government for bad decisions and policies. No government is perfect. But constantly showing only the negative side is not criticism, it is bias. There is a difference between criticism and hate. You are the second one.

@iNitinTyagi ये ऑडिटर बेचारों को संडे ब्रांच इसलिए खोलने की जल्दी होती है जिससे ये संडे का भी बिल क्लेम कर सकें / आदत के बहुत अच्छे होते हैं...संडे बुलाया है इसलिए काम कुछ ज़्यादा नहीं करते, वो मंडे से । और हां आए हैं तो लंच में थाली और नाश्ते में फ्रूट्स/ज्यूस मंगाते हैं मैनेजर से बेचारे /

🚨 Outsiders issuing ORDERS to open SBI branch on holidays A CA firm conducting statutory audit mails a @TheOfficialSBI BM on 4th April directing them to open the branch on a holiday for audit work. Since when did external auditors get the authority to override banking norms, security protocols and staff rights? Opening a branch on a holiday is not just “adjustment” it is a serious security risk for cash, documents and officials. For years, staff have been pressured to stretch beyond limits late nights, holidays and now even outsiders are dictating terms? This is not audit. This is institutionalized harassment. Fix the system. Respect rules. Respect staff. #SBI #Banking #WorkplaceRights #BankersVoice #StopHarassment

@bainjal Swati...Navika is very clearly saying that a "world leader doing this is unimaginable". World Leader. She can imagine & even accept a daft wannabe statesman doing it. After all, world leaders have standards... why put them for everyone who aspires to be one ! I support Navika.

“Congress ki Vidhwa” ref Sonia Gandhi & “50 cr Girlfriend” ref the late Sunanda Pushkar really made me livid as a woman & journalist when @narendramodi used them. Were you upset Navika, didn’t see one show or even a tweet. Such blind Modi worship

@bainjal Spot on as always. Maybe an entire SWAT analysis piece to read would be delicious. Still confused about YoYa to make a judgement but Bhushan too Swati ?? I mean he was a part and all....but doesn't seem like a power-hungry man. Recently even apologised unlike the rest /

Raghav Chaddha,Kumar Vishwas, Prashant Bhushan, Yogendra Yadav, Kiran Bedi & Swati Maliwal all part of the fraudulent RSS backed IAC & key members of Kejriwal’s little gang AAP. All out because of zero ideology except power seeking. The two Gupta’s in RS gave “resources” but don’t follow the party whip. Harbhajan Singh & latest money bags don’t even mention AAP in the bio. Ideology, loyalty & credibility matters. The people you cosy up to reflect you. Kejriwal has poor judgement & is a pure opportunist

@khurpenchh @8PMnoCM It's ironic & iconic for what's going to happen.. My friends at @khurpenchh, the few good men on this app fighting the right fight... are gonna recreate the scene from 'A Few Good Men (1992)'. In it when asked - I want the Truth ! The answer was - YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH //

First, we warned them, Then, we warned them again and gave them a hint, After that, we exposed them with complete documentation, we only shared the documents that were part of the internal committee report of FSSAI. Instead of taking action against the defaulters, they are targeting the person who is bringing these issues into the public domain. In the past, we have exposed many officials. Let them take us to court, they will expose themselves in the proceedings. Mark my words.

@LiveLawIndia That was quick... 😂😂

#BREAKING Delhi High Court orders immediate take down of controversial song by Honey Singh and Badshah from 2000s under name “Mafia Mundheer” (Volume 1). Court says song is grossly vulgar obscene and derogatory towards women and no civil society can permit such content to remain on digital platforms.

@anviisharma1 Says the girl posting thirst traps to earn 3-4k per month. 😂😂 Cleavages, thighs on every other post to lure engagement.....and the pot thinks she can call the kettle black !! Welcome to the "hey am #SIW" shit //

@pankajjha_ जिस लिस्ट में राजीव शुक्ला नहीं.....वो लिस्ट कोई लिस्ट नहीं //

#IndianExpress ने आज देश के टॉप 100 पॉवरफुल लोगों की लिस्ट जारी की है. इसमें केंद्रीय मंत्री पीयूष गोयल 5 वें नंबर पर और नीतीश कुमार 84 नंबर पर हैं. लोकसभा सांसदों के हिसाब से BJP और कांग्रेस के बाद तीसरी सबसे बड़ी पार्टी के अखिलेश यादव का नंबर भी तेजस्वी यादव के बाद हैं

@mufaddal_vohra As I said before.....still a chhapri /

@KUNGFU_PANDYA_0 Still a chhapri

Hardik Pandya gave ₹10 lakh each to all the groundsmen at Wankhede Stadium because he had promised them they had helped him practice late at night during T20 World Cup.

@chitraaum चित्रा बोल रही है मैं 2013-14 में पत्रकारिता सीख रही थी...... बेचारी को 12 साल हो गए हैं पर मजाल है कि उसने कोशिश छोड़ी हो ।। 😂😂😂

75 साल की मधु किश्वर की इतनी कुंठा? ((दो-तीन साल पहले का उनका ट्वीट भी पढ़ें)) 2013-2014 का दौर था, मधु किश्वर जी इंडिया न्यूज के दफ़्तर आतीं और तब के तत्कालीन सीएम नरेन्द्र मोदी के कसीदे पढ़ते थकती नहीं थी. “मोदीनामा” किताब का शीर्षक आपको सबकुछ बता देगा. मोदी ने जब उनकी किताब के लिये इंटरव्यू दिया तो उसे इंडिया न्यूज पर चलाया जाना था. मोदी को नुक़सान ना हो, उनकी कोई ग़लत बात नहीं जाए, उनकी छवि पर असर ना पहुँचे, मोदी नाराज़ ना हो जायें, मोदी जैसा अच्छा इंसान मैंने नहीं देखा, ये बातें संपादकों पत्रकारों से न्यूज रूम में शेयर करते मधु किश्वर नहीं थकती थीं. मैं उस समय बदलते राजनीतिक माहौल के बीच पत्रकारिता सीख रही थी. कई बार तो न्यूज़ रूम में ये भी चर्चा हुई कि मोदीनामा, मधु किश्वर ने इसलिये लिखा है क्योंकि वो राज्यसभा जाना चाहती हैं. मधु किश्वर से कुछ लोग मजाक में ये बोल देते थे तो वो शरमा जाती. मैं उस न्यूज़रूम का हिस्सा थी. आज उनके बेहूदे शब्द और भड़ास देखकर हैरान हूँ. राज्यसभा नहीं मिलने पर अंगूर खट्टे हैं वाली कहावत इन पर सटीक बैठती है. हमारे यहाँ बुजुर्गों के प्रति सम्मान की बात कही गई है मगर राज्यसभा नहीं मिलने पर 75 साल की मधु किश्वर का इतना फ़्रस्ट्रेशन ? इतनी कुंठा? इतना घिनौनापन? ये तो ठीक नहीं है मधु किश्वर जी. ईश्वर आपकी मनो स्थिति को ठीक करे 🙏🏻

@rajasthanroyals Chuxiye ho tum log /

Rajasthan Royals core 💗✨

@PunjabKingsIPL अबे सालों......काम फ्री में करूंगा.....ऊपर से 10 हजार रूपए महीना उल्टा अपनी तरफ से दे दूंगा @PunjabKingsIPL मैनेजमेंट को But please please please..... इस घटिया वीडियो को डिलीट करो और इसे बनाने वाली टीम को लात मार के बाहर निकाल दो ।। This is bat-shit crazy and so so so cringe /

Stoinu aa gaya re! 💪😍