Excellentbirds

791 posts

Excellentbirds banner
Excellentbirds

Excellentbirds

@Excellentbqrds

Katılım Ocak 2026
164 Takip Edilen326 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Excellentbirds
Excellentbirds@Excellentbqrds·
ZXX
0
0
13
6.9K
Excellentbirds
Excellentbirds@Excellentbqrds·
Imagine an AI video in which the wife is a soyed jack who says "oh my high trust did you nust kick a cone in front of my car" and the homeless is a Gigachad who replies "yes." That would be so funny, like something Frasier Payne would prompt.
Gary@plzbepatient

Homeless guy kicked a construction cone in front of my wife’s car as she was driving up and scratched up the fender. Very cool how that is actually completely legal because there are zero consequences or recourse for it

English
0
1
16
544
Excellentbirds
Excellentbirds@Excellentbqrds·
Buddy boyo Juanpablo, you are facefag, one that has on an occasion uttered the "anonymous cowards" phrase one usually hears from people who have recently emigrated to bluer pastures. Not really in a position to use "cuckservative" as an insult.
Damian Chávez - Artist@DamianChavezArt

There is a discrepancy with how the post transcribes what his exact Spanish phrasing is with how its framed here. Extremely nuanced. The isolated clip isnt rendering the subject itself any clarity since its assumed he is criticising the funding for individual idiosyncratic modern artists as state dependant. The cultural funding models for South America are more explicit, like Europe's, rather than the fake 'free market' for *arts funding* that exists inside the US. The US model is different with the unregulated but org/museum/collector driven system gently steered by imposter intellectuals (current signs are indicating that this is slowly weakening). Its very clear that most RW people, even leftists outside the loop have never been taught how (post)modern art as a whole has been "succesful" largely through *systemic* rather than "free market" means, which fundamentally have been tasked with subsidising it, since the 1950s. This system also aided the parallel branding (by cold warriors) as the elite self sustaining project that it is. Its perpetual sustainment however was made possible by power over the schools (with a fabricated historical narrative that renders it intellectually self-sustaining with almost religious belief & adherence). This legitimises the current system as justified recipient for state funding AND since the system is actively hostile towards anything rightwing AND "rightwing" culture inside America was largely rebranded as cuckservatism™️ (which practices cultural & social *retreatism*) then the arts system became more insulated from rightwing influence as a whole. The idea that actively funding art as a civic duty is inherently leftist (therefore bad from a RW perspective) is both bullshit + historically illiterate. [Just like the idea that protesting *anything at all* is inherently leftist is a post civil rights era legacy that for this very day is helping self sabotage the right's political & cultural goals.] What this arts system illiteracy tells me is that L&R are both outside the loop differently: the left feels zero shame for taking state funding (unlike the right, towards its detriment) & feels (without any basis within reality) that establishment art has already been historically subjected & tested by freemarket forces. The latter is entirely false & when small tests have happened, it inevitably fails. For example, ticket sales for such & such retard dogshit pile at BIG BOX MUSEUM vs oldmastery beauty at fuddy-duddy old art museum. It isnt even fair: beauty sells, ugliness is a subsidised scheme. There isnt any historical timeline where big & ugly modern art could have been a self-sustained freemarket project without state funding + systemic changes that benefitted private elites through policy changes instituted after WW2. When the funding appears "private" its indirect state support because laws (1954 tax code for example) were changed over decades which gave immense leverage for collectors & museums over & against artists who still cared about beauty, RW artists,etc. Skill based merit & public prestige was replaced by & separated from *private prestige*. The latter is what drives collectors & they fund what drives artists productivity. The laws helped legitimise such prestige through museums & sales figures. Its a perfect system for making & exhbiting art disliked by the public. If you want RW cultural change ASAP, stop letting the establishment cultural left benefit from the legal structures that allowed its dominance ever happening at all. Change the laws. Change the policies - any pretense that they were *ever* neutral is preposterous. Neutrality isnt even desirable, since "placement is power". The left grasps this. Neutrality was always fake but the stakes were never as high than today. If Neutral policies were legally binding (as is assumed by our naive leaders) they would by themselves have destroyed the left's chokehold over the arts decades ago. @MillennialWoes

English
0
0
8
250
Excellentbirds
Excellentbirds@Excellentbqrds·
You people engagement bait worse than OF whores and then feign ignorance as to why someone might be sick of you. There's a certain desert ethnicity that behaves exactly in the same manner.
VB Knives@Empty_America

It will never cease to be amazing how much serious, malicious anger was triggered (including among "nationalists" and "RW") by someone making an effort to promote revival in perhaps the deepest core of "Heritage America." Tells you a lot.

English
0
0
13
223
Excellentbirds
Excellentbirds@Excellentbqrds·
Mister Thuletide, my girlfriend renounced her dangerhair ways and is trad now, is this in order?
Excellentbirds tweet mediaExcellentbirds tweet media
English
0
0
24
294