FLE7CH

@bigg_matthew @richgel999 And when Eisenhower entered a contract with one of the two in 1954, I don't think the Vatican believed the US had picked the side of the angels.

@FLE7CHLIVES @richgel999 Yes, the angels/demons narrative seems to be the one that the Church supports. Danny Sheehan talks a lot about how the Jesuits handle the issue.

1/12/1953: Cardinal Spellman, mentioned in the Majestic Documents as helping prevent panic during the summer of '47 UAP wave, is photographed with Bishop James Francis McIntyre, who was said to be present at a mass UAP event at Edwards AFB in 1954. newspapers.com/article/the-ti…

@bigg_matthew @richgel999 Spellman was the "right hand" of Pius XII, who took a deep interest in all of this. He interpreted them as literal angels and demons

@FLE7CHLIVES @richgel999 Interesting, Spellman wasn't a Jesuit and that's the order specifically tasked to handle UFO/UAP issues.

@richgel999 I couldn't even remotely imagine :P

@FLE7CHLIVES this info isn't from a memo, it's from another quite more exotic source

@richgel999 The Grow/Twining Memo of September 20, 1947 certainly speaks to a mid-air collision at Alamogordo. Unbelievably, I think that was a separate incident 😵‍💫

@FLE7CHLIVES What we've heard: mid-air collision, a gift, pilots were shocked.

@richgel999 and Spellman's presence was required under the agreement the US had made with Pius XII over the retrieval of the Magenta craft. Just like McIntyre's, years later. Someone had to brief the Pope.

@richgel999 The Army knew UFOs were there, for sure. But how did they know they were going to crash? Because they'd learned about the "death ray" Marconi was using just prior to the Magenta crash. I think Roswell was an EMP shoot-down

@richgel999 Here's a question worth asking: How did the US Army know to summon Spellman to Washington and then New Mexico a couple of days *before* the Roswell crashes?

@richgel999 Mate, I could talk all day about it. Will send you a DM after work ;)

@HighEarthOrbit_ @UAPWatchers Thanks mate, can I get a link to that 258-page file?

@FLE7CHLIVES @UAPWatchers Released 1985...page 37 in the same packet of paperclip documents being referenced

🚨MJ-12 Validation? If True This Is Huge! A new analysis claims that the Majestic 12 documents share real CIA file identifiers with officially declassified records. Specifically, document control numbers like "834021-" appear both in authenticated CIA archives and in certain MJ-12 materials. For decades, critics dismissed MJ-12 as pure fabrication. The standard line has been that it was a 1980s hoax, but if internal routing codes, file references, and archival markers in the MJ-12 set align with genuine CIA indexing formats from the same era, then were these documents entirely fabricated, or built using authentic internal frameworks? If someone forged these in the 1980s, they had an advanced understanding of CIA file taxonomy and document control systems way before the internet made that kind of research easy. This is definitely a kick back against the lazy 'debunked, move on' narrative. Proving the MJ-12 files are legit is massive news. If you haven't read them and want to know why this is huge, you can view the files here: vault.fbi.gov/Majestic%2012/… Th source to the substack explaining how the file numbers are legit: majestictruth.substack.com/p/majestic-doc… #MJ12 #UAP #UFO #Disclosure #FOIA #IntelligenceArchives

@HighEarthOrbit_ @UAPWatchers Thanks Grider. Can you show me where 834021 appears on declassified documents *before* this?

@FLE7CHLIVES @UAPWatchers

@HighEarthOrbit_ @UAPWatchers With all due respect to the great Ryan Wood—he may have noted the serial number, but he didn't link it to the Paperclip documents that were declassified in 2022. He couldn't have. He was 20 years too early.

@UAPWatchers It depends...but this 834021 processing number has been discussed before, as far back as 2003. Ryan Wood's presentation at the 1st UFO Crash Retrieval Congress talked about it.

@wkpixley1 @MonkeeSage @MagentaUFOUAP @pemble_brian @RedPandaKoala @truthtold24 @jamescfox @tyoung Thanks Pix. Ryan Wood also runs the website linked above, I recommend checking it out ;)

@MonkeeSage @FLE7CHLIVES @MagentaUFOUAP @pemble_brian @RedPandaKoala @truthtold24 @jamescfox @tyoung Ryan Wood is Bob Wood's son and probably the single biggest authority out there on the Majestic docs

The Condon Committee was a rort—and now we have proof. This unassuming document from Hillenkoetter to Dennison is the key 👇

@tdarmtech Oh that's just the first 400 pages pictured. I've got the rest plotted out too (because I likely have undiagnosed OCD) 🤣

@FLE7CHLIVES Also: 1574-1603 (CIA doc), 1604-1609 (MJ doc).

While the world edges closer to annihilation, UFO researcher MJ-12 Logic just drove another nail into the coffin of Majestic sceptics @mj12logic/note/p-189393604?r=15so4c" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">substack.com/@mj12logic/not…

@tdarmtech This is a great resource, thank you my mate :)

@FLE7CHLIVES Found this: Project 63 was a 1951 AF program out of Holloman and White Sands "to place knowledgeable German scientists and engineers into private sector positions within the aerospace industry." wsmrmuseum.com/wp-content/upl…

@tdarmtech Paperclip was intrinsically tied to UFO recovery and reverse-engineering—we've got that paper trail too. Working on another piece around exactly that issue :)

@FLE7CHLIVES What's the link in the document to Roswell? The Project number?

@MonkeeSage @MagentaUFOUAP @pemble_brian @RedPandaKoala @truthtold24 @wkpixley1 @jamescfox @tyoung The next question is—where are the other pages? Each of those white cells represents a page that remains unreleased after 80 years. What are they still trying to hide?

@MonkeeSage @MagentaUFOUAP @pemble_brian @RedPandaKoala @truthtold24 @wkpixley1 @jamescfox @tyoung Not sure what you mean. The 834021 serial number is used as a prefix for *at least* 1,939 individual Paperclip pages. But the point is, we didn't know that when the Majestic Documents were leaked. Ryan Wood is your man for provenance majesticdocuments.com/documents/docu…

@MonkeeSage @MagentaUFOUAP @pemble_brian @RedPandaKoala @truthtold24 @wkpixley1 @jamescfox @tyoung Yes there's a stamp that reads "834021" and then a handwritten sequential number. Here's what it looks like visually, with the Cantwheel documents in cyan:

@FLE7CHLIVES @MagentaUFOUAP @pemble_brian @RedPandaKoala @truthtold24 @wkpixley1 @jamescfox @tyoung But here we have 834021-239(?) there we have 83402(1?)-330.

@MonkeeSage @MagentaUFOUAP @pemble_brian @RedPandaKoala @truthtold24 @wkpixley1 @jamescfox @tyoung Not just interesting—damning. It's a stamp that appears on one other of Cantwheel's Majestic documents (pictured) from the '90s and a few hundred pages of Paperclip documents only declassified in 2022.

@FLE7CHLIVES @MagentaUFOUAP @pemble_brian @RedPandaKoala @truthtold24 @wkpixley1 @jamescfox @tyoung Interesting. Is 834021 used in the document? Seems to be missing a digit, 83402.