Fernandez
12.3K posts

Fernandez
@FafandingB
Chelsea fan💙 Goat 🐐 CR7 💯 My idol Lampard 💙 Enzo 8 my favourite player 💙 Chelsea till i die 💙💙 follow me and i will follow back immediately 🇬🇲🇬🇲🇬
Republic of The Gambia Katılım Şubat 2018
4.5K Takip Edilen4.1K Takipçiler

Hey Queen Bee @KingBobIIV ,
It’s painful I am just seeing this. You ask why Muslims never talk about our beloved Prophet died? The truth is we broadcast it. We have this documented in our two most authentic books, Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Muslim. These texts are entirely public and heavily studied. There is no secret for us to hide.
The incident happened in 628 CE at Khaybar. The person who did this was Zaynab bint al-Harith. She was a prominent Jewish noblewoman of Khaybar. She had just lost her father, uncle, and husband in the battle. She had a severe motive for revenge.
So, she went around interrogating his companions beforehand, asking them which cut of meat he preferred. When they told her he liked the shoulder, she loaded that specific part with a lethal toxin.
If you truly understand theological history, you would know that this assassination attempt was not a random isolated event. The scriptural history of the Children of Israel is heavily marked by the persecution of messengers from God. Our Quran said this. Even your Bible documented this continuous pattern.
For instance, the religious elites of the past killed prophets such Zakariyya and his son Yahya. Even in the case of Isa (Peace be upon him), who you know as Jesus, their explicit intention was to execute and humiliate him on a cross. If not for the Almighty who intervened and raised him to heaven, they would have crucified him.
So when Zaynab tested Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) with poison, she was following a very old, established playbook used against previous prophets.
Just so you know, the poison was undeniably fatal. Another companion sitting right next to him, Bishr ibn al-Bara, swallowed a piece and dropped dead on the spot.
If Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) was a false prophet, biology dictates he dies right there in the dirt at Khaybar. Lethal medieval poisons do not wait. But he did not die. He spat it out because the Almighty in His wisdom revealed the plot to him.
If you and your minions are not blockheads, why not ask yourselves what happened after that incident?
Let me educate you and others who may want to use this playbook…
The supposed "poisoned man" went on to achieve what healthy, unpoisoned emperors could not. He lived for four more years. In those four years, he marched into Mecca and conquered it. He unified the entire Arabian Peninsula. He also went after the global superpowers. In 630 CE, he led an army of 30,000 men in the Expedition of Tabuk, marching straight to the northern border to challenge the Byzantine Empire.
Even the popular Scottish historian, orientalist and Anglican priest W. Montgomery Watt could not help but document this in his book "Muhammad at Medina". He documented how this massive expedition terrified the region.
The Roman border forces and their allies completely withdrew. The Byzantine army refused to engage and abandoned the frontier. A supposedly dying man marched to the doorstep of Rome and broke their regional political grip without swinging a single sword, forcing northern Christian and Jewish tribes to sign treaties with him instead of Rome.
Let me also call your attention to the healthy, unpoisoned leaders of that era.
We had the Byzantine Emperor Heraclius and the Sassanid Persian King Khosrow II. They were exhausting their empires, losing territory, and struggling to maintain their borders.
Meanwhile, this poisoned man established a state and a military machine that humiliated them and swallowed both of their empires shortly after his death. The prominent secular historian Michael Hart ranked Muhammad as number one in his book "The 100" because his unparalleled secular and religious success peaked right in this specific window, between 628 and 632 CE.
You cannot survive a lethal military grade poison, conquer a continent, march on the Roman border, finalize a global faith, and then have internet trolls call your death a failure. That would be gravely ignoble.
Queen Bee@KingBobIIV
Why do Muslims never talk about how Muhammad died and who killed him and why?
English

You are dumber than the dumbest person to have ever been dumb. Iran is shooting those planes because they invaded their airspace and killing them. If you had stayed in America, they would not need to do that. It looks to us all that you invader is the one who cannot be allowed to possess nuclear weapons!
Laura Loomer@LauraLoomer
Now, imagine if Iran had nuclear weapons. It can never be allowed.
English

I laugh in Chinese 😂
Should I burst your bubble? Let me burst it because I see that you don’t want to learn. You have been fed with lies and it has compounded your ignorance.
You are confusing the first three hundred years of early Christianity with the last 1700 years of Christendom. Yes, the early followers of Jesus were persecuted. However, the moment the Roman Empire adopted Christianity under Constantine and later made it the only legal religion with the Edict of Thessalonica in 380 AD, the persecuted became the violent persecutors. Pagans were slaughtered and their temples destroyed.
Have you read about Charlemagne? During the Saxon Wars in the 8th century, he issued a law called the “Capitulatio de partibus Saxoniae.” His official state policy was baptism or death. I know you don’t know this Barbie 😂. He beheaded thousands of Saxons in a single day at the Massacre of Verden for refusing to convert.
When the Conquistadors arrived in the Americas, they read a document called the “Requerimiento” to the native populations. It demanded they submit to the Church and the Spanish Crown, or face war, enslavement, and death. Was that people repenting and turning to Jesus? State violence played a huge role in Christianizing Europe and the Americas.
Now let me turn to Islam. I see that you are ignorant, and this has made you conflate political expansion with religious conversion.
When Muslim armies defeated the Byzantine and Persian empires, they conquered land and established political authority. They did not put swords to the necks of civilians to change their faith. If they did, places like Egypt, Syria, and Persia would have become Muslim overnight.
However, historical records show these regions remained majority Christian and Zoroastrian for almost 300 years after the initial Islamic conquest. They converted gradually over centuries under the Dhimmi system because they were protected and allowed to keep their faith.
Take a look at the largest Muslim populations today. Indonesia, Malaysia, and massive regions of East and West Africa. No Muslim army ever marched there. Islam spread entirely through trade routes, scholars, and the moral character of Muslim merchants.
Do not take my word for it. Sir Thomas Arnold, a non-Muslim historian in his book “The Preaching of Islam” thoroughly dismantled this sword myth. In fact, the famous British historian De Lacy O'Leary wrote in his book “Islam at the Crossroads” and stated expressly that: the myth of the legend of fanatical Muslims sweeping through the world and forcing Islam at the point of the sword is one of the most fantastically absurd myths that historians have ever repeated.
Will I open your head and speak truth to it if you can’t be open minded to learn? This subject matter is well above your pay grade. Maybe your boss Dachomo will do better. And I promise, I will school him.
Thank you for your attention.
Barbir@Alex_Barbir
@YusufAsunmogejo Why is it that there is one religion in the world founded on conquest, war, and violence? While Christianity spread through persecution, through people repenting and turning to Jesus, Islam spread by force.
English

@TommyLy284787 @JimmyKings8 Let them come and arrest the supreme leader like they did in Venezuela, you will pity Americans 😂😂
English

@FafandingB @JimmyKings8 Haven't you heard what happened in Venezuela?😂🤣😆
English

@JimmyKings8 @Basnoghai so you blocked me 😂, you think defending USA because they will save your ass in Nigeria
English

@IIkemefule @LBGamestips You think USA is coming to save you in Nigeria , 😂
English

@LBGamestips Education doesn't excuse supporting terror. Degrees won't save a regime that funds death and chants "Death to America."
English


@robin3652 @Basnoghai @JimmyKings8 Crying 😂 is that all you could say, you stupid Indian idol worshipper
English

Nigerians have no reason to talk down on Iranian government because life expectancy in Iran is 78yrs while it's 55yrs in Nigeria. Now, who's living a more reasonable life between us??
They tell you how Iranians are oppressed but there's no evidence to support it, yet you believe everything without doing even a little research. A population that's screaming "school na scam" have no reason to talk down on a nation where 99% of their young women between 19-24yrs are educated. We're just foolish in this country.
English

@TommyLy284787 @JimmyKings8 Yet USA are scare of ground invasion 😂 Iran are still standing strong, you kill 1 leader, another 1 replace him
English

@Basnoghai @JimmyKings8 Is schools, universities and hospitals part of military operations ? Use your head
English

@JimmyKings8 Soon you will cry WAR CRIME in Iran!! It is the innocent Iranians I pity!!
English

@Armchai34321481 @aidelomo_happy @Jordan54941136 @ibrahimhajjeda It's very easy to spot islamiphobic fools
English

@aidelomo_happy @Jordan54941136 @ibrahimhajjeda As we know, muslims pollute whatever country they go to.
English

















