Tore Fagerlie

5.9K posts

Tore Fagerlie banner
Tore Fagerlie

Tore Fagerlie

@Fagerlie

Jobber med rekruttering i NES Advantage Solutions. Midt-Norge, Bergen og Stavanger. Lidenskapelig tilhenger av Manchester United og Molde FK, og sport generelt.

Kristiansund, Norway Katılım Aralık 2009
250 Takip Edilen259 Takipçiler
Tore Fagerlie retweetledi
Kenneth L
Kenneth L@eliteserieblog·
Enda en som snur fra for VAR til mot VAR. Stan Collymore sier: "But I was wrong. Woefully and completely wrong." Hvor mange har snudd motsatt vei? Og gått fra å være skeptisk til VAR til å nå være for det?
Stan Collymore@StanCollymore

VAR I enthusiastically welcomed it. Was sold on the higher percentage of right decisions so we could all go home knowing football justice had been done and we could concentrate on which player was crap instead. But I was wrong. Woefully and completely wrong. Waiting 5 minutes for a decision to be made alone means the system isn't fit for purpose. Why? Because I sat with TV producers who said everything would be wrapped up in 10-30 seconds. It has literally taken the spontaneous joy from the most important part of the game. A goal. Then, one thing completely blindsided me and many others. Subjectivity. I thought there would be science and a nailed on guarantee of a successfully and universally accepted decision. How wrong we were. Instead, arbitrary lines are drawn that simply can't with any certainty say whether a player is offside or not. So a human in a portacabin, 200 miles away only does what the referee can do, make a best guess. Likewise handballs, dives, any penalty decision to be honest. A subjective decision decided out of stadium allowing an increasingly small and poor refereeing pool a get out of jail free card. Instead of them making a shit decision and owning it, they just pass it on 200 miles away so 3 men in a portacabin can make a shit decision instead. Lunacy. For the love of the game, let's go back to investing in getting more referees, respecting them so that they join the trade and don't feel constantly abused. In short, treat them like rugby referees. Ultimate respect. Then, fuck VAR off, it's ruined the game, made it petty and chaotic, and taken that one ingredient that you simply can't replace, instantaneous joy. As a player and fan I accepted a referee making a bad decision in a game in the same way I accepted fucking up a shot or pass. We're all human. Let's get back to that, humans doing their best, everyone walks away from the ground accepting that and less unrealistic pressure put on officials to be perfect when perfection doesn't exist in any walk of life. VAR stinks. A system designed to help is a massive hindrance and it's about time pundits, fans, players, referees, clubs put pressure on authorities to get rid of it. We only need goal line tech, the rest can and should be refer refereed by humans making their best judgement. A best judgement that was over 98% right( audited fact pre VAR). Enough is enough, fuck it off.

Norsk
2
1
11
1.3K
Tore Fagerlie retweetledi
Davy Wathne
Davy Wathne@DavyWathne·
Hver dag! Hver eneste jævla dag! Dommeravgjørelser, VAR-sjekk, frysbilder, armbevegelser, kuvendinger og endeløse tv-diskusjoner med «eksperter» som åpenbart ikke er eksperter på fotballreglene og deres stadig nye fortolkninger. Vær så snill. Få det til helvete vekk.
Davy Wathne tweet media
Davy Wathne@DavyWathne

I min tid var dommerne der. Som saksbehandlere og funksjonærer for å få kampene unna. Som oftest ble vi oversett. Noen ganger fikk vi skryt eller ble skjelt ut. En sjelden gang endte vi som kampens hovedaktør. En sjelden gang. Nå dreier alt seg om dommere, VAR og dømming! ALT!

Norsk
14
56
658
55.7K
Tore Fagerlie retweetledi
Stan Collymore
Stan Collymore@StanCollymore·
VAR I enthusiastically welcomed it. Was sold on the higher percentage of right decisions so we could all go home knowing football justice had been done and we could concentrate on which player was crap instead. But I was wrong. Woefully and completely wrong. Waiting 5 minutes for a decision to be made alone means the system isn't fit for purpose. Why? Because I sat with TV producers who said everything would be wrapped up in 10-30 seconds. It has literally taken the spontaneous joy from the most important part of the game. A goal. Then, one thing completely blindsided me and many others. Subjectivity. I thought there would be science and a nailed on guarantee of a successfully and universally accepted decision. How wrong we were. Instead, arbitrary lines are drawn that simply can't with any certainty say whether a player is offside or not. So a human in a portacabin, 200 miles away only does what the referee can do, make a best guess. Likewise handballs, dives, any penalty decision to be honest. A subjective decision decided out of stadium allowing an increasingly small and poor refereeing pool a get out of jail free card. Instead of them making a shit decision and owning it, they just pass it on 200 miles away so 3 men in a portacabin can make a shit decision instead. Lunacy. For the love of the game, let's go back to investing in getting more referees, respecting them so that they join the trade and don't feel constantly abused. In short, treat them like rugby referees. Ultimate respect. Then, fuck VAR off, it's ruined the game, made it petty and chaotic, and taken that one ingredient that you simply can't replace, instantaneous joy. As a player and fan I accepted a referee making a bad decision in a game in the same way I accepted fucking up a shot or pass. We're all human. Let's get back to that, humans doing their best, everyone walks away from the ground accepting that and less unrealistic pressure put on officials to be perfect when perfection doesn't exist in any walk of life. VAR stinks. A system designed to help is a massive hindrance and it's about time pundits, fans, players, referees, clubs put pressure on authorities to get rid of it. We only need goal line tech, the rest can and should be refer refereed by humans making their best judgement. A best judgement that was over 98% right( audited fact pre VAR). Enough is enough, fuck it off.
English
381
688
5K
322K
Tore Fagerlie
Tore Fagerlie@Fagerlie·
@Glimt er eneste Eliteserielag som ikke går i Borgertoget 17 mai. Flaut og skammelig og viser hvor lavt de har sunket.
Norsk
0
0
0
22
Tore Fagerlie retweetledi
Tore Fagerlie retweetledi
Magnus Joki Arild
Magnus Joki Arild@MagnusJokiArild·
Den her er fin. Du skal være ganske heavy overbetalt og vrangforestilt om du ikke klarer å gå i tog med små barn på 17. mai. Som utdannet utholdenhetstrener kan jeg avsløre at det fin restitusjon for slitne bein. Har du andre utfordringer, bør man koble på mental-treneren.
Magnus Joki Arild tweet media
Norsk
9
22
556
29.4K
Tore Fagerlie retweetledi
Espen Berntsen
Espen Berntsen@Espennr7·
På grunn av kampprogrammet så gidder ikke Glimt å gå i Borgertoget! «Skamløse som vi er - så kom å hyll hos på scenen» Da er greit høy på seg selv - og har mistet fullstendig bakkekontakten 🤦🏻‍♂️
Espen Berntsen tweet media
Norsk
8
2
130
9.3K
Tore Fagerlie retweetledi
Daniel Gundersby
Daniel Gundersby@DanielTowsey1·
Det gis altså et straffespark av VAR hvor ballen er ute i forkant…. I tillegg så treffer ballen beinet og så opp i armen.. Hvordan er det mulig?? Få det dritet bort…
Daniel Gundersby tweet media
Norsk
3
2
51
7.8K
Tore Fagerlie retweetledi
Emil Almås
Emil Almås@emalmas·
VAR skulle liksom gjøre alt enklere og mer forståelig🤭 Det vi sitter igjen med er et jævla virus som hverken spillere, tilskuere, dommere, TV-eksperter eller NFF selv forstår en dritt av! Legg ned!
Svein-Erik Edvartsen@Edvartsen

RBK - LSK: Straffen til RBK: Siden Hobber Nilsen mente denne var så enkel, så sendte jeg klippet til en person som er FIFA-instruktør, som skal til VM, og som er dommerveileder i UEFA Champions League. Fasit = RBK skulle aldri hatt straffe!

Norsk
4
4
170
13.6K
Tore Fagerlie retweetledi
Svein-Erik Edvartsen
Svein-Erik Edvartsen@Edvartsen·
RBK - LSK: Straffen til RBK: Siden Hobber Nilsen mente denne var så enkel, så sendte jeg klippet til en person som er FIFA-instruktør, som skal til VM, og som er dommerveileder i UEFA Champions League. Fasit = RBK skulle aldri hatt straffe!
Svein-Erik Edvartsen tweet media
Norsk
22
26
286
93.8K
Tore Fagerlie retweetledi
Henry Winter
Henry Winter@henrywinter·
Michael Carrick has left the Stadium of Light in more despondent moods. “Don’t ever forget what this feels like,” Sir Alex Ferguson told Carrick and the other crestfallen Manchester United players on the bus leaving Sunderland after news came through of Aguerooo and City’s title winner in 2012. Carrick never forgot that feeling of misery and anger. Disappointment with today’s draw is nothing in comparison, of course, but Carrick will be in reflective mood as he leaves SOL. Just because he doesn’t throw verbal fireworks around during post-match interviews doesn’t mean he’s not passionate about reviving United. He is. Everyone knows how deeply Carrick cares about United. Most around him know how driven he is, too, and that he wants to play attractive football. As he did as a player there. Performances definitely need to be better, and fans' frustration with that side of the Carrick spell is understandable. Sunderland were the better side, by most accounts, and United were indebted to Lammens. But it was all about stabilising United for now. Carrick has done well as interim - 10 wins, 3 draws, 2 losses. He’s dispensed with the wrong system, put players in their best position, restored belief and got United back into Champions League positions. Third is all but guaranteed. Third. United were sixth and drifting when Carrick took over. But he’s not a miracle worker. That squad needs strengthening. United need proper cover in attack when Sesko is out. Zirkzee simply isn’t good enough. They need a left-back and left-winger. Most importantly, a successor to Casemiro. If anybody understands the need for United to regain control of midfield it is Carrick, who played there 464 times for them (minus a few at emergency centre-back). Sir Jim Ratcliffe might want a bigger name but Carrick has surely earned a shot at input into summer signings, a pre-season, and a chance to show what a Carrick Manchester United can do. #MUFC
English
95
105
1.2K
418.3K
Tore Fagerlie retweetledi
Aston Villa Updates
Aston Villa Updates@avfcbreaking·
There was a time when a European final belonged to the supporters who dragged their club there. Not anymore. When Aston Villa were handed roughly 11,000 tickets for a Europa League final in a 70,000-plus stadium, the number itself told the story. UEFA can package the event however it likes — “festival of football”, “European showpiece”, “global celebration” — but the modern European final is no longer built around supporters. It is built around clients. The supporters fund the journey. The corporates inherit the destination. Villa fans will have spent thousands following the club across Europe. Flights, hotels, time off work, loyalty schemes built over years. Yet when the final arrives, huge sections of the stadium are reserved for sponsors, hospitality guests, executives, delegates and “neutral” allocations that often end up on resale sites within hours. And supporters are expected to accept it. UEFA’s defence is familiar. Sponsors fund competitions. Broadcasters need space. Hospitality drives revenue. All true. But football crossed a line when the event surrounding the final became more important than the supporters inside it. The optics are awful because fans can see it themselves. A finalist gets 11,000 tickets while corporate packages costing thousands remain available. Genuine supporters scramble through ballots with lottery-like odds, while neutral areas fill with tourists taking photos during the warm-up. And UEFA wonders why resentment grows. Supporters are constantly called “the lifeblood of the game” until ticket allocations are discussed. Then they become an inconvenience to work around premium inventory. Football did not become Europe’s dominant sport because sponsors created atmosphere. The noise, colour and emotion UEFA sells globally every season is generated by match-going supporters — the same people increasingly pushed aside at the biggest games. The “neutral fan” concept is perhaps the biggest fiction of all. In theory it promotes access. In reality it fuels resale markets, inflated prices and thousands travelling ticketless out of desperation. UEFA could change it tomorrow. Finalists could receive 70 per cent of the stadium combined. Corporate sections could shrink. Hospitality would still exist. But that would mean sacrificing revenue. And modern football has shown repeatedly which side wins that argument. #AVFC #scfreiburg
Aston Villa Updates tweet media
English
413
1.1K
5.1K
704.8K
Tore Fagerlie retweetledi
Olav Haraldseid
Olav Haraldseid@OHaraldseid·
Både Jonas Gahr Støre og Gaute Skjervø uttaler at Fremskrittspartiet har et alvorlig kulturproblem. AP har til opplysning ikke et kulturproblem😳
Olav Haraldseid tweet media
Norsk
15
19
186
3.2K
Tore Fagerlie
Tore Fagerlie@Fagerlie·
Knutsen og @Glimt Hva klager dere på i kveld? Noe som var urettferdig? For mange kamper? For få kamper?
Norsk
0
0
0
24
Tore Fagerlie retweetledi
Henry Winter
Henry Winter@henrywinter·
Football needs a long look at itself, its Laws, its consistency of application, officiating standards and use of VAR when you can pull an opponent’s hair and get a three-game ban and go in hard on an opponent, endangering them, Keane on Doku, and get just a yellow 🤷 #EVEMCI
English
563
363
3.6K
383.7K
Tore Fagerlie retweetledi
heinevik
heinevik@Heinevik·
Viking har tre bedre vinger enn Jens Petter Hauge.
Norsk
5
3
118
11.5K
Tore Fagerlie retweetledi
Bjørnar Holen
Bjørnar Holen@BjornarHolen·
Frå en av Champions Leagues beste spelara til en av Eliteseriens svakaste på få måneda. Det e no en slags prestasjon det også, Jens Petter Hauge.
Norsk
5
1
70
17.9K
💛m̷a̷g̷n̷u̷s̷ støver
Må det hamres inn i hodet på folk at Bodø/Glimt ikke hete Bodø? Bodø e håndballklubben. Kor fette vanskelig kan det vær?
Norsk
25
1
32
13.2K