Felis Impurrator

4.9K posts

Felis Impurrator banner
Felis Impurrator

Felis Impurrator

@FelisImpurrator

Pun maker, shitposter, cats in a trenchcoat. | Woker than you. Probably funnier too. | I hate all rightoids equally, including those with lefty aesthetics.

The Imperium of Catkind Katılım Aralık 2010
1.3K Takip Edilen103 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Felis Impurrator
Felis Impurrator@FelisImpurrator·
I don't like labels generally, but I go by "non-binary" because it's technically correct and I can make jokes about quantum computing. Anything else involving gender is something I just don't want to get entangled with.
English
1
0
3
0
Felis Impurrator
Felis Impurrator@FelisImpurrator·
@Buldrokastee Rhodes Island, you telling me a fucking hospital can threaten a whole nation-state (ALL OF KAZIMIERZ) into complying with its demands with no effort and has the strongest paramilitary on Terra? They've crushed gods and eldritch horrors countless times.
English
1
0
3
245
Felis Impurrator
Felis Impurrator@FelisImpurrator·
@emilyis_emilies @tamaescence Okay, for clarification, they're talking about the character Endeavor from MHA... Who as far as I can tell was never confirmed to have committed spousal rape. That's a headcanon because he WAS an abusive husband, but no such thing was ever confirmed. So no. Didn't happen.
English
0
0
0
15
Felis Impurrator
Felis Impurrator@FelisImpurrator·
@emilyis_emilies @tamaescence This person is either lying or equating something they don't like to rape apologia. Not a single person, and I scrolled for several PAGES on mobile, QRTed with anything resembling "rape is ok actually". That's not a thing.
English
1
0
0
30
chisu 🥖
chisu 🥖@tamaescence·
not only is this bad writing rhetorics 101 but also tone deaf to narrative actions & consequences. ppl are allowed to analyze & criticize the writing they think is bad esp when the writing celebrates certain characters &/or the decision they make. i fear this is common knowledge
the emiliest! 🌻@emilyis_emilies

it’s weird when people demand a character face “consequences” for their actions in shows bc like. they’re not real. the purpose of making a character isn’t to treat them how you’d treat a real person, it’s to be tools for a narrative you want to tell

English
2
6
42
2K
Felis Impurrator
Felis Impurrator@FelisImpurrator·
@tamaescence @emilyis_emilies Things not aligning with your moral intuitions is not "bad writing" actually. Stories have no obligation to do that. All they need to do is follow logical cause and effect.
English
0
0
0
20
chisu 🥖
chisu 🥖@tamaescence·
@emilyis_emilies celebrating the results of their actions while portraying the character in a glorified manner & then not doing anything ab their actions later on in the story is bad writing i fear,, ppl have opinions 🤷🏽‍♀️ im also talking in gen sense & not ab a particular cc like u seem to be
English
2
0
1
147
hamster
hamster@Hamsterie·
This is the greed they speak of in the Bible... Just big & Greedy...
English
5
520
2.1K
65.1K
Felis Impurrator
Felis Impurrator@FelisImpurrator·
@MotherMuchy2 Ancient Egyptians had a lot more skin color diversity than people think due to their position as a major trade hub and willingness to accept people provided they speak the language and adopt the culture/religion, I've heard, so that's not even necessarily a problem.
English
0
0
1
28
Muchy 🌟SpiderNut Progenitor🌟 Mozzarella 🇵🇭
This webtoon is already pretty bad when you consider that they made Egyptian characters have light skin but I think this particular criticism is strange because Horus is the main character and also the good guy and none of them have any real personalities anyway
Eye@dfghbbbh73264

@MotherMuchy2 Yeah but the way the author made the dark skin guy have no personality outside of being Obsessed with his uncle feels quite racist she made him act like clingy dog to his white skin uncle who also was dark skin in the original methology

English
2
0
9
338
Felis Impurrator
Felis Impurrator@FelisImpurrator·
@neezjutzzzz @A_Penlordnt @hellspatisserie I acknowledge the risk of reactionary rhetoric poisoning the brains of myself or others. I'm just weighing it against the relative utility of breaking a fascist's spirit or shortening their lifespan by boiling their blood.
English
0
0
0
5
Felis Impurrator
Felis Impurrator@FelisImpurrator·
@neezjutzzzz @A_Penlordnt @hellspatisserie If I were to convince myself of that and consequently stopped thinking through my actual positions afterward, I would also have fucked up by poisoning my brain. But if neither of those things happens, owning the neonazi is consequently more good than harm.
English
1
0
0
9
Felis Impurrator
Felis Impurrator@FelisImpurrator·
@neezjutzzzz @A_Penlordnt @hellspatisserie Uh, no. I weighed that outcome against the negative outcome of radicalizing an audience to earnestly, sincerely dehumanize their opponents based on an ingroup bias. That is the comparison. Benefit (owned rightoid) vs harm (making leftists more reactionary).
English
0
0
0
13
Felis Impurrator
Felis Impurrator@FelisImpurrator·
@neezjutzzzz @A_Penlordnt @hellspatisserie Consequentially, unless my nobody ass goes viral, no I don't. My level of responsibility is proportional to the scale of my ability to effect change. Same way one car driver is like, 1/100000 or something of a single billionaire's private jet flight in terms of emissions.
English
0
0
0
8
Felis Impurrator
Felis Impurrator@FelisImpurrator·
@neezjutzzzz @A_Penlordnt @hellspatisserie No, actually, I wrote a whole thread distinguishing between saying a thing and believing the ideology. Also, that's still believing in individual character rather than good or bad actions. I only believe in the latter because I'm a utilitarian.
English
1
0
0
10
Neez🏳️‍🌈
Neez🏳️‍🌈@neezjutzzzz·
@FelisImpurrator @A_Penlordnt @hellspatisserie Believing that people can be good or bad does not imply that either of those things are inherent qualities of a person. You just made that part up because you got tired of coming up with excuses for why using facist rhetoric to own people on twitter is secretly super woke.
English
1
0
0
10
Felis Impurrator
Felis Impurrator@FelisImpurrator·
@neezjutzzzz @A_Penlordnt @hellspatisserie Wait, did you actually not see that I said more than one tweet's worth of stuff? If you genuinely didn't know, that's what I meant by not reading the whole thing. I distinguished between using the words and believing the underlying ideology.
English
1
0
0
23
Felis Impurrator
Felis Impurrator@FelisImpurrator·
@neezjutzzzz @A_Penlordnt @hellspatisserie What bullshit did you call me out on? You literally tried to argue that I shouldn't be talking about ethics because I don't believe in the concept of a "good person". So you believe that people can be good, ergo, that character exists, yes?
English
1
0
0
11
Felis Impurrator
Felis Impurrator@FelisImpurrator·
@neezjutzzzz @A_Penlordnt @hellspatisserie You just did, though. The idea that a "good person" is something someone IS is, by definition, essentialism. And you're not having a conversation because you've already put me in the "bad person" bucket in your head. Do you know what ethics terms mean?
English
1
0
0
10