AFellaNamedTrand

9 posts

AFellaNamedTrand

AFellaNamedTrand

@FellaTrand

Political account for @tranderas. Opinions don't reflect my employer. I'm a pro-UA cartoon dog, what more do you need to know?

Katılım Şubat 2023
0 Takip Edilen0 Takipçiler
aka
aka@akafaceUS·
If you see an account with “NAFO” in it be sure to report it + block it. These people are exploiting the Twitter reporting system to get Republicans banned.
English
379
198
783
67K
AFellaNamedTrand
AFellaNamedTrand@FellaTrand·
@SizemoreSuzette @akafacehots I mean, she's half right. People who don't support Ukraine are pro-Putin, and those who are pro-Putin are against the interests of the United States. There are plenty of never-war liberals that get caught in the cartoon dog net as well.
English
0
0
1
16
AFellaNamedTrand
AFellaNamedTrand@FellaTrand·
@YaamsPa @IrSubterfuge @akafacehots It's a bunch of people who use cartoon dog avatars and jokes to mock Russian propagandists and misinformation about the UA-RF war. People mad about us are typically RF sympathizers and making traitors unhappy makes me happy.
English
1
0
2
26
Lauren Boebert
Lauren Boebert@laurenboebert·
Sometimes a meme says it best.
Lauren Boebert tweet media
English
8.9K
8.3K
65.1K
3.6M
AFellaNamedTrand
AFellaNamedTrand@FellaTrand·
@JuddLegum @davidhogg111 @CommunityNotes Businesses have a right to serve or not serve who they please. Twitter, as a privately-owned business, has a right to enforce their ToS as they see fit. 1A does not give the right to speak on private platforms as one sees fit nor does it protect any speech from criticism.
English
0
0
0
4
Judd Legum
Judd Legum@JuddLegum·
.@davidhogg111 has the right to express his opinion about the second amendment without @CommunityNotes attaching commentary. Hogg is not disputing the Supreme Court has recognized an individual right to bear arms. He’s saying the Supreme Court is wrong.
Judd Legum tweet media
English
1.4K
202
1.2K
615K
AFellaNamedTrand
AFellaNamedTrand@FellaTrand·
rally for the nation in forming statewide militias, and against a corrupt government if need be. So arming Ukraine's citizens means doing what our Constitution allows us to do. We should support others having that same freedom of self-determination.
English
0
0
0
29
AFellaNamedTrand
AFellaNamedTrand@FellaTrand·
It's worth noting that I'm a gun-owning small-l libertarian, so a bunch of what I post will be attempts to counter narratives that involve increasing government power. I think the 2a position is consistent with supporting UA, as the original purpose was to allow citizens to-
English
1
0
0
33
AFellaNamedTrand
AFellaNamedTrand@FellaTrand·
Hi! This is where I'll be doing more political commentary. Expect a lot of stuff on the UA - RF war, health misinformation, and discrediting faulty lines of reasoning from American politicians.
English
1
0
0
35