مسلم

97 posts

مسلم banner
مسلم

مسلم

@FirmlyUponHaqq

Irish Convert

Katılım Nisan 2026
8 Takip Edilen10 Takipçiler
مسلم
مسلم@FirmlyUponHaqq·
@hureyaksa It is obligatory for the ruler to provide for the people, it is obligatory for him to implement the shariah, its obligatory for him to protect the people and honour their sanctity, and so on. If he is unable to do this, let him give up his position, and give it to the one capable
English
0
0
0
122
نحو الحرية
نحو الحرية@hureyaksa·
علماء السلطان ردًا على مطالبة الشعب بالوظائف: "مطالبة ولي الأمر بالوظائف من عمل الخوارج ولا تجوز مطالبتهم بفرص عمل لأنها بمثابة طلب الرزق من غير الله، لكنهم جهلة ويمثلون أجندة تسيء للبلاد ولمقام ولاة الأمر". #فيصل_المطيري
العربية
445
230
1K
193.3K
مسلم
مسلم@FirmlyUponHaqq·
A Muslims soul is more cherished to Allah than this entire world.
English
0
1
6
53
بلال
بلال@Sunnahakh1·
Wahhabism a buzzword used by opposition who oppose the Quran and Sunnah they don't even know what it means they have been told by their illiterate ancestors and teachers.
English
15
18
145
3.4K
مسلم
مسلم@FirmlyUponHaqq·
@zjnhnfi @Sunnahakh1 If a person claims Islam and he calls out to an idol or the dead seeking their intercession to get closer to Allah is he associating others with Allah if he also says he believes Allah is his creator, and provides for him, and causes him to die?
English
1
0
0
29
Hanēfī Seldžukī
@FirmlyUponHaqq @Sunnahakh1 I am satisfied with worshipping Allah alone, What I’m not satisfied is your khawarij mindset takfiring innocent Muslim, just like you did in this post. You are filled with logical fallacy’s if you read carefully what you’re saying.
English
2
0
0
47
مسلم
مسلم@FirmlyUponHaqq·
@zjnhnfi @Sunnahakh1 You seem unsatisfied with me stating to worship Allah alone, if you were satisfied, you would not require me to answer, as the answer is clear unless you contradict what you say you believe in, this is why I will not engage in your next topic.
English
1
0
0
32
مسلم
مسلم@FirmlyUponHaqq·
@zjnhnfi @Sunnahakh1 Do you believe it’s wrong to use a verse about the Kuffar to say if you do what the Kuffar did in that verse you would also be Kuffar?
English
0
0
0
20
مسلم
مسلم@FirmlyUponHaqq·
@zjnhnfi @Sunnahakh1 The khawarij used it incorrectly and applied it when it had nothing to do with the individual. We apply it in its correct context, on the correct people. And where there is an excuse of ignorance, we excuse who rightfully should be excused, and when there isn’t, we don’t.
English
1
0
0
24
Hanēfī Seldžukī
@FirmlyUponHaqq @Sunnahakh1 🤣 ain’t no way boy Idk what me saying “requires strict condition” has to do with disproving that I said the khawarij did it? Because they did. As for those strict condition; is that they negate what is known by necessity and other…This alone disproves you. But ok
English
1
0
0
25
مسلم
مسلم@FirmlyUponHaqq·
@zjnhnfi @Sunnahakh1 You actually just disproved yourself as you compared the use of verses revealed about the Kuffar on others to be "what the khawarij did" unrestrictedly, now you agree applying those verses to others can be done, Alhamdulillah.
English
2
0
0
34
Hanēfī Seldžukī
@FirmlyUponHaqq @Sunnahakh1 So you whole argument fails and proves my point. Qur’anic verses about previous nations can be used as warnings, lessons, or analogies for Muslims. But applying verses of kufr/shirk to specific Muslims requires strict conditions and scholarly precision.
English
1
0
0
27
مسلم
مسلم@FirmlyUponHaqq·
@zjnhnfi @Sunnahakh1 Elder of convert man? The first thing I’ll say is to learn Arabic, this will benefit you inshAllah and help you avoid humiliation. The second thing I will say is worship Allah alone, if this makes you uncomfortable, or unsatisfied, then you have bigger issues to worry about.
English
1
0
0
24
مسلم
مسلم@FirmlyUponHaqq·
@zjnhnfi @Sunnahakh1 I tell you; worship Allah alone and call upon him alone. You people seemingly cannot accept the shahadah without defending what contradicts it and the foundation of the religion.
English
1
0
0
26
مسلم
مسلم@FirmlyUponHaqq·
@zjnhnfi @Sunnahakh1 They didn’t follow the way of the Jews so he did not Takfeer them, if they followed those Jews which the verse was revealed about, then they would be Kuffar.
English
1
0
0
33
Hanēfī Seldžukī
@FirmlyUponHaqq @Sunnahakh1 That’s what I’m asking you, it is related. Did he warned them or takfired them? Which of the two? Did he said that they were kafirs at that moment? Give a simple answer to prove your point which you fail to prove it Did he warned them of takfired them?
English
1
0
0
26
مسلم
مسلم@FirmlyUponHaqq·
@zjnhnfi @Sunnahakh1 No because they didn’t follow the way of those Jews whom Allah revealed the verse about, he (ﷺ) is warning them that if they follow the way of those Jews by continuing, they would be Kuffar like them, which is using a verse revealed about the Kuffar, to takfeer others.
English
1
0
0
18
مسلم
مسلم@FirmlyUponHaqq·
@zjnhnfi @Sunnahakh1 You’re asking an unrelated question, are you even aware of the conversation? Your critique is that using a verse revealed about the disbelievers to takfeer others is wrong, The Prophet (ﷺ) used a verse revealed about the disbelievers to Takfeer the one who does what THEY did.
English
2
0
0
30
Hanēfī Seldžukī
@FirmlyUponHaqq @Sunnahakh1 I read clearly what you said. That wording itself need explanation too. But what I’m asking you is simply this; did he considered the Sahaba Kufar at that point once they asked him?
English
1
0
0
31
مسلم
مسلم@FirmlyUponHaqq·
@zjnhnfi @Sunnahakh1 (2/2) This is the Prophet (ﷺ) using a verse revealed about the Kuffar against anyone who follows the way of the Kuffar that the verse was revealed about.
English
1
0
0
23
مسلم
مسلم@FirmlyUponHaqq·
@zjnhnfi @Sunnahakh1 The Prophet (ﷺ) said "you shall follow the way of those who were before you" which means if they follow that way they would be Kuffar, but they didn’t, we say the same, if anyone follows the way of those Jews they are Kuffar, and that is using a verse revealed about them.
English
1
0
0
49
Hanēfī Seldžukī
@FirmlyUponHaqq @Sunnahakh1 Similarity in wording or action does not automatically mean equality in ruling. My question to you is did the Prophet here considered the Sahaba Kafirs?
English
1
0
0
47
مسلم
مسلم@FirmlyUponHaqq·
@zjnhnfi @Sunnahakh1 It was also done by the Prophet (ﷺ) , would you dare compare the Prophet (ﷺ) to the Khawarij like you did in your other post? Or would you realise your unrestricted principle is flawed, or admit that you pick and choose when to apply it?
مسلم tweet media
English
1
0
0
57
Hanēfī Seldžukī
@FirmlyUponHaqq @Sunnahakh1 This also said by alqaida and daesh to make the blood of the muslim halal go join them. Also way off topic Mr. Convert Man, nobody is worshiping graves. You have no clue about my views on this and you throw this thinking you did somethin good. Go apply for daesh suits you
English
1
0
0
53
مسلم
مسلم@FirmlyUponHaqq·
@zjnhnfi @Sunnahakh1 In tafsir a basic principle is a generality of a verse is considered for rulings, so whoever imitates the actions revealed about Kuffar, are themselves Kuffar regardless if they claim Islam, and what u are saying is also said by the murjiah and grave worshippers.
English
1
0
0
36
مسلم
مسلم@FirmlyUponHaqq·
@zjnhnfi @Sunnahakh1 The great Tabi' and Imam of Tafsir Mujahid ibn Jabr who studied with Ibn Abbas, who Sufyan al Thawri said "If you get Mujahid's tafsir, it is enough for you." called this Shirk, just like everyone else. x.com/FirmlyUponHaqq…
مسلم@FirmlyUponHaqq

Mujahid ibn Jabr: {And most of them do not believe in Allah except while they are associators}. "Their belief is their saying: Allah is our Creator, and provides for us and causes us to die. So this is belief together with shirk in their worship [dua] of other than Him."

English
1
0
0
82
Hanēfī Seldžukī
@Sunnahakh1 So the great faqih of the hanbali madhhab Imam Mustafa Ahmad ash-Shatti who comes from a traditional Hanbali family that goes back to Ma’ruf al-Karkhi whom Imam Ahmed praised, when he wrote against Wahabiyyah he was just opposing the Quran and Sunnah? He didn’t knew the meaning?
Hanēfī Seldžukī tweet media
English
3
0
4
224