FirstAidSack
6.4K posts



@BrockRiddickIFB Wrong. The burden of proof rests on those who claim either way.
English

@QuantumAlteredX Not really, people just tend to trust experts more than dilettantes. The hypnosis is done by society, and it doesn't have to be with expert's opinions. Society often teaches the opposite. And just because you reject experts, you're still far from being free from the hypnosis.
English

@sawyeurism "I know we didn't go to the moon because it's a fact."
That's not how that works.
English

@Pwnidus @Luvh0ez19 @kirawontmiss Many cameras have auto exposure which adjusts it to the incoming levels, similar to our eyes, but this one doesn't have it or hasn't turned it on.
English

@Pwnidus @Luvh0ez19 @kirawontmiss Because it's still the same exposure as before. If you prolong the exposure time you should start seeing the night side of the earth, as well as well the stars.
English

don’t cook me for this but why we can’t see any stars?
diesgu@diesgu
o por do sol visto do espaço
English

@The_brownest1 @kirawontmiss @Luvh0ez19 This is a perfectly fine question, and only a retard would think it's a stupid question. The given explanation is wrong. It doesn't explain it. The real explanation is camera exposure.
English

@kirawontmiss @Luvh0ez19 I mean its an insanely stupid ass question that no educated adult should be asking
English

@Luvh0ez19 @kirawontmiss That's a wrong explanation. In daytime, the sun lights up the atmosphere, which makes stars invisible. But this is above the atmosphere. We don't see stars here because of the camera exposure, which tries to capture the earth and the sun, and not just two bright blobs.
English

@MYTmurderyatrak @darkvdred Lowkey it does.
But believing the opposite of the mainstream does not.
English

@darkvdred Bruh believing nothing don’t make you smarter then everyone. 😂
English

@amiiology It's very good. The seasons after it are just even better.
English

@GreenTeebox @JacquiDeevoy1 No, the defense is that there is no other bigger planet or object under the earth that would pull people from the bottom towards it.
English

@JacquiDeevoy1 The globtard defense of this is that gravity keeps everyone and everything upright. Even on Antarctica.
English

@JacquiDeevoy1 And why are you leaving the huge earth beneath that? Of course, the gravity from the bigger earth would pull the ones on the bottom of the small one down.
English

@Seekthetruth101 You're conflating constant linear speed and acceleration.
English

@JacquiDeevoy1 You can't call it expertise when you based all of it on preconceived notions.
English

I give up. I really do. I’ve been looking at fake NASA ‘photos’ for about 12 years now and they just get more and more ridiculous.
Jeremy@ManaByte
This is one of the greatest photos ever taken by a human…so far.
English

@JohnScott848965 @PhilosophyOfPhy It does, the Coriolis effect produces tornadoes.
But what affects movement is acceleration, constant linear speed, no matter how fast, does nothing. The only thing about earth's movement that has an effect is the acceleration in form of rotation. But rotation itself is slow.
English

@JohnScott848965 @PhilosophyOfPhy Because the air is also moving more or less with the earth (not exactly, so there are winds).
English

@PhilosophyOfPhy So, if the Earth is spinning at 1,000 mph and I jump in the air, why does my position upon grounding remain the same?
English

@x_net_things @Andercot Degrees also, who says that a circle must be 360°?
English

@Andercot Incredible coincidence, but remember: the Great Pyramid is a massive structure. Its latitude covers a range of coordinates, and we only defined the 'meter' and 'second' long after it was built. It’s a classic case of looking for patterns until they fit!
English

It's the latitude of the Pyramid of Giza
299,792,458 m/s
29.9792458° N
Kekius Maximus@Kekius_Sage
Why does light travel at exactly that speed?
English











