FlerfFactChecker

3.4K posts

FlerfFactChecker

FlerfFactChecker

@FlerfChecker

Conspiracy Theory Fact Checker, self volunteering and unpaid.

Katılım Haziran 2022
193 Takip Edilen150 Takipçiler
Gr8Believer
Gr8Believer@Gr8Believer·
@PreteristMike @MattB_M2M I have family in Orlando slap bang in the middle of the path. Expecting storm on Thursday. They didn't evacuate, they're going to bunker down. They'll let me know what happens tomorrow.
English
1
0
0
76
FlerfFactChecker
FlerfFactChecker@FlerfChecker·
@FTFEofficial It’s like they’ve never heard of isolating variables to make a fair test. If they believe the medium an object is in is the direct cause of movement, then remove the medium (aka make a vacuum). Things fall in a vacuum. Gravity proven.
English
0
0
1
22
Craig McNeill
Craig McNeill@FTFEofficial·
buoyancy is a result of gravity...yes, it makes things go up...
English
5
1
31
716
FlerfFactChecker
FlerfFactChecker@FlerfChecker·
“A single atom of hydrogen can be used as a catalyst for nuclear fission” - Flat Earther ❓❓❓
Joycjoint@joycjoint

@FlerfChecker You need a better education. A single atom of hydrogen can be used as a catalyst for nuclear fission and you think they need a lot of it. 🤣🤣🤣 You really are ignorant.

English
0
0
0
37
FlerfFactChecker
FlerfFactChecker@FlerfChecker·
@FlerfHerder @WeebGeekAM My new big question to them is what’s the energy source. They can say “Oh it just lights up” all they want, but they can’t just ignore basic physics.
English
0
0
1
16
The Flerf Herder
The Flerf Herder@FlerfHerder·
@WeebGeekAM "And the moon is luminary too! There's no shadow on the moon. Globe debunked!" 😂💯
English
3
0
1
136
FlerfFactChecker
FlerfFactChecker@FlerfChecker·
@joycjoint So you can’t understand basic shapes. Something a nursery kid can do. A sphere is 3D. You don’t get to tell me I’m “uneducated”.
English
1
0
0
2
Joycjoint
Joycjoint@joycjoint·
@FlerfChecker It invalidates anything that claims to be 3d only, as 3d doesn't exist. I know you are having a hard time accepting it but it is what it is. Earth is a perceptible plane and space changes shape with observer distance, POV and time.
English
1
0
0
13
FlerfFactChecker
FlerfFactChecker@FlerfChecker·
@joycjoint Also this has nothing to do with the Van Allen Belts, because there is no fission or fusion reaction occurring there. They don’t have the conditions needed for nuclear reactions like fission or fusion.
English
1
0
0
7
Joycjoint
Joycjoint@joycjoint·
@FlerfChecker This is one of those things that you are wrong about. You only have limited information and I cannot help you know better. I can say they have done things with lasers that zero out the need for a neutron but doubt the ability to find data on the reaction.
English
2
0
0
10
FlerfFactChecker
FlerfFactChecker@FlerfChecker·
@joycjoint Lasers have been explored in experimental nuclear FUSION, but not FISSION. Fission always requires neutrons to split a nucleus, and no known technology has eliminated that need. If you’re referring to fusion, that’s a completely different process involving hydrogen, not fission.
English
1
0
0
14
Joycjoint
Joycjoint@joycjoint·
@FlerfChecker Other dimensions absolutely exist but 3d only exist as a cut from 4d. There is no place in reality that is 3d only.
English
1
0
0
11
FlerfFactChecker
FlerfFactChecker@FlerfChecker·
@joycjoint Even with increased energy or temperature, ionised particles don’t just cause matter to break apart by repelling each other. The Van Allen belts do contain energetic particles, but their interactions with materials, like satellites result in gradual wear, not instant destruction.
English
1
0
0
6
Joycjoint
Joycjoint@joycjoint·
@FlerfChecker They do when they have a substantial increase in temperature. Like what happens in the Van Allen belt. Even if only measured as energy potential.
English
1
0
0
9
FlerfFactChecker
FlerfFactChecker@FlerfChecker·
@joycjoint Actually, in nuclear fission, a neutron is always required to initiate the reaction in heavy atoms like uranium or plutonium. Fission cannot happen without a neutron to split the nucleus. Hydrogen cannot be involved in this process. Like at all. What are you on about?
English
1
0
0
7
Joycjoint
Joycjoint@joycjoint·
@FlerfChecker You are wrong. I am talking about atomic fission. It creates a boom if not precisely controlled. A neutron isn't required with modern tech and hydrogen is amazingly efficient.
English
1
0
0
8
FlerfFactChecker
FlerfFactChecker@FlerfChecker·
@joycjoint 4th dimension doesn’t invalidate the existence of other dimensions. They co-exist.
English
1
0
0
6
Joycjoint
Joycjoint@joycjoint·
@FlerfChecker If you believe that, school won't even help with your ignorance. Quantum entanglement proves extra dimensions and a globe is 3d only. Reality is 4d or more. Other dimensions are similar to IR. We may not see them but they absolutely exist around us and totally invalidate a globe.
English
1
0
0
20
FlerfFactChecker
FlerfFactChecker@FlerfChecker·
@joycjoint Ionisation can affect materials over time, but ionised particles don't simply repel each other to the point of destroying matter.
English
1
0
0
3
Joycjoint
Joycjoint@joycjoint·
@FlerfChecker You don't understand ionization causing material break down do you? Ionized particles repel each other. How do you think that affects materials?
English
1
0
0
10
FlerfFactChecker
FlerfFactChecker@FlerfChecker·
@joycjoint Ions don’t break down matter. There are plenty of ions on earth and they don’t simply cause atoms to break apart. I don’t know what you’re basing your point on. But it seems to be a misunderstanding.
English
0
0
0
3
Joycjoint
Joycjoint@joycjoint·
@FlerfChecker You don't understand how atoms free of electrons repel each other and break down materials.
English
1
0
0
12
FlerfFactChecker
FlerfFactChecker@FlerfChecker·
@joycjoint And even with fission. It’s impossible with a Hydrogen atom, because it doesn’t have a neutron. Fission requires a neutron and a heavy nucleus (like in Uranium).
English
0
0
0
19
FlerfFactChecker
FlerfFactChecker@FlerfChecker·
@joycjoint You’re talking about nuclear fusion. Nuclear fusion (where multiple atoms fuse together) can’t happen with a single atom because… what are you combining it with? Also even small scale fusion won’t be enough to sustain itself.
FlerfFactChecker tweet media
English
2
0
0
17
FlerfFactChecker
FlerfFactChecker@FlerfChecker·
@joycjoint I’m not hiding hydrogen in the sky. I am saying there isn’t much. And not enough in a single area to do whatever you want with it.
English
1
0
0
10
Joycjoint
Joycjoint@joycjoint·
@FlerfChecker Yes I ridicule people trying to hide the hydrogen in the sky. If you knew how they use the it you would be less upset with me. You might even find a similar level of disgust for people participating as globe supporters in such an obvious lie. But you returned to your "gap".🤣🤣🤣
English
1
0
0
11
FlerfFactChecker
FlerfFactChecker@FlerfChecker·
@joycjoint You’re spouting misrepresented information. Like representing free electrons as an entire atom.
English
1
0
0
6
Joycjoint
Joycjoint@joycjoint·
@FlerfChecker I made several specific points and you still keep spouting incorrect information.
English
1
0
0
10