Matthew

I think one must conclude that Starmer is working for interests actively against the good of the UK. No sane, intelligent PM could be this deluded, biased, and desperate to exercise dictator like controls. Ridiculous & sad.

It's the hot topic in Australia 🇦🇺 and across the West. The public have lost faith in the migration narrative. They don't trust the Government, the numbers, the economic impact.

A strategic relationship built on trust (ha). Spying to victory.....

I do not support One Nation. This is what happens when the people are ignored and the political & economic systems push society to the edge. Their big win in the farrer by-election was extraordinary. Quietly, they are gaining support in various quarters. Much more to come.

🚨FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Independent Press Gallery condemns Starmer government for banning foreign journalists and commentators from UK independentpressgallery.com/independent-pr…

I fear the UK is at a serious tipping point and Starmer is at fault. Astounding really. Also really sad.

@Ryandally08 Get these people out of Australia 🇦🇺 They worry about the "far right"!? Well they are in most mosques in the country. Get them out.

An Inman at Lakemba Mosque in Sydney: “Jihad for the sake of Allah is the only way to conquer the world and impose the ruling of Islam” “The Jihad will continue until judgement day” I wonder if this falls under Albo’s new “hate speech” laws.

@RupertLowe10 The King spoke so well in Washington DC but remains silent in the UK. For the sake of the UK he should (must) call for a general election. Not sure you can survive 3 more years of the epic division.

My aim in court was to reclaim power for the elected MPs, and therefore the people, from the unelected bureaucrats - I failed. We now have the scandalous situation in which unqualified and unelected civil servants can wield parliamentary privilege to literally place themselves above the law. They now hold a special legal status which means they cannot be challenged in court - positioned even higher than MPs for whom the system was actually designed. Parliamentary privilege, an ancient right, exists so that MPs can speak without fear in the chamber, it does not exist to give faceless bureaucrats legal immunity. I wanted to challenge the system in an open and fair court, with ruthless transparency so that the British people could finally see the truth. Our judiciary has not allowed that to happen, enabling unelected civil servants to weaponise parliamentary privilege, designed for MPs, to entirely avoid scrutiny and fair legal challenge. Jacob Rees-Mogg, former Leader of the House of Commons, previously commented on the case. “Thus if Lowe wins, he will not have harmed Parliament, but defended it. For through cowardice we – and I was an MP at the time – abdicated our privileged responsibility and gave it to unelected boffins, who are not so much better than elected politicians after all, but much harder to eject.” A fair summary, yet here we are. I have come to the brutal conclusion that the only way to restore Britain is to win the next general election. That is our last available route out. Restore Britain is the only chance our country has.

The UK at an inflection point, driven by their idiotic, socialist PM. Starmer is driving the UK to the edge & the destruction of his Labor party. Civil War whispered quietly in dark corners. The vast decent majority have had enough. Unbelievable really. Sad.

@SandyXiaotong Somewhere along the line we have forgotten the taxpayer who funds all of this. It has to stop, we need to reset priorities. Australian citizens first (all Australian citizens regardless of background).

ABC FAKE NEWS: Watch Sarah Ferguson demand migrants get access to welfare because “they might have to renounce [their former] citizenship” if they were to become Australian. And they might “loose assets” in their former country if they did. Watch.

@IrishmanIRL I was recently in Central Dublin. It was eye opening. The drug use and scale of migration was surprising; didn't feel safe or Irish. Outside of Dublin, native Irish described it as "a national embarrassment"! The heart of Dublin. It is the stark reality.

"I was out last night, to a man people were saying fair play to Bertie" Woke RTE presenters are shocked at what former Lord Mayor of Dublin Cllr Nial Ring has to say on the Bertie Ahern controversy

Be like Poland is the quote. Starmer is an imbecile. His actions have made this global news and brought into serious question the issue of free speech & a two tier policing on the global stage. It's the stuff of the Stasi.

@Artemisfornow Ironically, it only helps the Patriot cause. The amplification of attention to this event & intentions behind it, is brilliant publicity with global attention. If Starmer's Stasi like approach had rather ignored it, we may not have even noticed it. Now it is global news.

er … This whole article is deeply troubling but the most alarming bit is this … Not only have 8 foreign speakers been banned from entering the country but for the first time, police have imposed speech conditions on speakers at the Unite the Kingdom march (and the Palestinian march) Organisers are now being held responsible for ensuring invited speakers don’t break the law by … “platforming unlawful extremism or hate speech” and they will be held responsible if they do. Whatever your politics, this is terrible for free speech. Who decides what hate speech is? People who simply don’t like what is said? In addition live facial recognition will only be used at the Unite the Kingdom march. These are pre-emptive speech controls used subjectively to shut up dissent and close down debate … for your safety.

Interesting data set. Amazing that the Budget faced into this.

Anyone who has dealt with Australian supermarkets would be entirely unsurprised by this determination.... abc.net.au/news/2026-05-1…

Pretty much spot on. I spoke with many British citizens on an ad hoc basis.....Starmer is hated, along with his Government. Nice visit aside from that, bit glad to be back in Australia.

Having recently returned from the UK, my observation is that it is a mess, held down by a Government that seems completely at odds with what is best for the British people. At times it feels like Starmer is a foreign agent working to the benefit of external interests.

@jon_delorraine I often ask "liberals" who advocate open borders, "sell your house & move into a heavy migrant area if you believe in it so much".... They quickly find a reason why they can't. Intellectually they love being Liberal, but are not willing to "walk the talk"! Reality v idealism.

Depuis plusieurs années, une fracture grandissante s’installe entre les peuples européens et leurs dirigeants. En France avec Macron, en Allemagne avec Merz, au Royaume-Uni avec Starmer ou en Espagne avec Sanchez, une même mécanique politique semble désormais à l’œuvre : gouverner contre une partie croissante de la population tout en expliquant que les citoyens "ne comprennent pas", "exagèrent" ou doivent simplement accepter les décisions prises d’en haut. Partout, les mêmes inquiétudes remontent pourtant avec insistance : explosion de l’insécurité, pression migratoire incontrôlée, déclassement économique, effondrement des services publics malgré des niveaux records de dépenses, perte des libertés numériques et sentiment d’abandon démocratique. Et partout, les réponses apportées semblent aller dans la direction inverse. Quand les peuples demandent davantage de contrôle des frontières, on leur répond par toujours plus de mécanismes supranationaux et de répartition administrative des flux migratoires. Quand les classes moyennes réclament une baisse des dépenses publiques et de la pression fiscale, les gouvernements annoncent de nouveaux plans, de nouvelles taxes, de nouveaux dispositifs financés par une dette devenue permanente. Quand les citoyens demandent davantage de fermeté face à la violence et à l’insécurité, on multiplie les discours, les observatoires, les cellules de suivi et les communications ministérielles sans jamais traiter réellement les causes profondes. Et quand les peuples expriment leur colère ou leur opposition sur les réseaux sociaux, le pouvoir répond de plus en plus par la surveillance numérique, la lutte contre la "désinformation", les restrictions de visibilité, les pressions sur les plateformes et l’encadrement du débat public. Le plus frappant reste que ces dirigeants continuent souvent à se présenter comme les défenseurs de la démocratie tout en contournant de plus en plus clairement les aspirations populaires lorsqu’elles deviennent politiquement dérangeantes. Le référendum devient suspect lorsqu’il ne produit pas le "bon" résultat. Le vote populaire est qualifié de "populisme" lorsqu’il remet en cause les orientations du système. Et toute contestation des politiques migratoires, budgétaires ou sécuritaires est rapidement renvoyée à "l’extrémisme ou à l’irrationalité." Une partie des élites européennes semble désormais considérer que gouverner consiste moins à représenter les peuples qu’à les encadrer, les corriger et parfois les neutraliser politiquement pour préserver un modèle devenu intouchable. Le problème n’est plus seulement économique ou sécuritaire. Il devient démocratique. Car lorsqu’un pouvoir refuse durablement d’entendre les préoccupations majoritaires sur l’immigration, les dépenses publiques, l’insécurité ou les libertés fondamentales, il finit par créer une rupture profonde entre les institutions et les nations elles-mêmes. Et plus cette rupture grandit, plus la tentation du contrôle augmente : contrôle du discours, contrôle numérique, contrôle administratif, contrôle des comportements au nom de la stabilité, de la sécurité ou de la lutte contre les "mauvaises opinions". L’histoire montre pourtant qu’aucun système ne reste stable très longtemps lorsqu’il donne à des millions de citoyens le sentiment que leur vote ne change plus réellement la direction prise par ceux qui gouvernent.

@RupertLowe10 @Inevitablewest It's so stupid and demonstrates extreme bias. They can just appear via video link & it certainly amplifies the impact of their comments to the audience. Really not thought through.

This Government is entirely wrong to ban foreign commentators from speaking at Robinson’s rally on Saturday I will be formally challenging the Home Office, again, on the decision to prevent these individuals from entering. I won’t be there myself, but many patriots will be and they deserve to hear lawful views in order to decide for themselves if they agree or not. That is free speech. Islamist extremists are personally welcomed by the Prime Minister, yet this group is banned. It stinks.

@larissawaters Electoral funding raising and donations should be reported within 24hrs via a live web portal. Try Victoria with the $15B CFMEU corruption scandal! Focus on that, because that Union is the largest funded to the ALP nationally.....

On Budget night tonight, an exclusive group of Australia’s 1% will pay $110,000 to dine with Labor’s inner circle. The 1% pay a worker’s annual wage to sip champagne with the PM, while you read the news about NDIS cuts that pay for increased defence spending. It’s cooked.