Sunday Memba
114 posts



The Sexual offences Act does not forsee a possibility of a man being raped by a woman.We need to amend it.




JSC only writes letters to Havi and will even base a complaint on Social Media posts. The rest of us who send written complaints to JSC receive an email acknowledgment, zero follow up. We filed a complaint in 2023, received an acknowledgment in 2025 December.









The Kenyan judiciary is overwhelmed with backlogs, repeated adjournments, and delayed justice for advocates and litigants alike. For years, the Bar has condemned this culture, demanding efficiency, discipline, and strict respect for court timelines. Any LSK President must be part of the solution, not a contributor to the problem. SC Kanjama has written to the Court of Appeal seeking to remove a matter from the hearing list after submissions had already closed, solely because he, as lead counsel, is engaged in an election campaign not due to illness, not an emergency, not force majeure, but elective ambition. So, are we comfortable with future candidates or senior advocates citing personal pursuits to interrupt the judicial calendar? How is this conduct any different from the very adjournment culture the Bar has consistently and publicly condemned? When advocates complain about endless postponements, this is precisely what they mean; matters delayed not by necessity, but by choice. A candidate who responds to pressure by postponing hearings is demonstrating the exact reflex the profession is trying to eliminate. Leadership is tested when personal interests collide with institutional responsibility. Advocates, do we want an LSK President who confronts delay and defends the integrity of court processes or one who normalises delay the moment it becomes inconvenient?















