Foodscaping Co.

The Fabaceae Food Forest Concept Introduced, by @FoodscapingCo open.substack.com/pub/foodscapin…

@lifesmyth @CascadiaDept Currently working through such thoughts via "The Lichen Project". More info soon.

Now we need one of these coded for the regenerative community for food production, seed preservation, and open source equipment. @FoodscapingCo @CascadiaDept

World Water Day — March 22 Slow Water, Grow Life Preserving precipitation through permeable processes = Hugelkultur

Data sovereignty is becoming a core requirement for internet infrastructure: developers need to be able to choose jurisdiction and data locality. For example, under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), organizations must control where user data is processed and stored. This is a very real regulatory pressure companies face across Europe around data residency and sovereignty. Cloud Engines will provide the flexibility and customizability that businesses are finding increasingly crucial.

Interesting! DFINITY researchers have found a way to enable new Internet Computer GPU nodes to run: — frontier LLMs (not just neural networks as today) — competitive speed & cost — inference verifiable i.e. "onchain" Notes...🧵

⚡️ NEW: Vitalik Buterin proposes merging Ethereum's consensus and execution layers into one unified code structure to simplify node setup.

Proof that ICP is accelerating: ▪️ 58,000+ new canisters in February alone, meaning a 50% growth since July 2025 ▪️ 10× Chain Key signing throughput increase, unlocking faster cross-chain operations ▪️ First all-SEV subnet is live: this improves confidential computing and strengthens decentralized infrastructure security Watch the latest DFINITY R&D session to learn more about these developments plus a furry surprise 🐕 youtu.be/yVDtzQdNOjo

Most used blockchains by total transactions since Token Generation Event (TGE) 1. $ICP: 275B (Age: 5 years) 🥇 2. Solana: 104B (Age: 6 years) 3. Hedera: 71.2B (Age: 6 years) 4. Stellar: 22.3B (Age: 10 years) 5. Tron: 13.3B (Age: 8 years) 6. BNB Chain: 11.8B (Age: 6 years) 7. Fogo: 7.31B (Age: 1/3 year) 8. Polygon: 6.67B (Age: 6 years) 9. BSV: 6.66B (Age: 7 years) 10. Base: 5.8B (Age: 3 years) 11. Near: 5.23B (Age: 6 years) 12. Sui: 4.05B (Age: 3 years) 13. Algorand: 3.37B (Age: 7 years) 14. Ethereum: 3.3B (Age: 11 years) 15. Aptos: 3.12B (Age: 3 years) 16. TON: 2.97B (Age: 5 years) 17. Kaia: 2.83B (Age: 7 years) 18. Sei: 2.5B (Age: 3 years) 19. Arbitrum: 2.05B (Age: 5 years) 20. Somnia: 1.67B (Age: 1/2 year) 21. Bitcoin: 1.32B (Age: 17 years) 22. Avalanche: 1.11B (Age: 5 years) 23. Optimism: 1.05B (Age: 4 years) 24. Polkadot: 0.7M (Age: 6 years) 25. MultiversX: 0.5M (Age: 6 years) Source: @chainspect_app

Ah yes, banks. In addition they like to finance both sides in #wars. Usury is a base evil and #Bitcoin will solve and resolve this.

Dev graph from Electric Capital — for Internet Computer, ICP 🔥 Soon, an iceberg of self-writing users will join the craft & vibe coders on GitHub, and AI agents are coming too.. ICP dev numbers are already a multiple of those on other networks. Join us. developerreport.com/ecosystems/dfi…

@FoodscapingCo Yes! Keep it up. May there be native seeds saved everywhere on Earth.

This is exactly why we have saved #Seeds assiduously.

We have always needed Solar Power for our #FoodSecurity foodscaping.substack.com/p/food-seeds-s…

“I want all my nodes in Germany.” “I want GDPR compliance across Europe.” “I want to run on 7 Amazon data centers.” Cloud engines on @dfinity will let you pick exactly where your apps run. And here’s the big unlock: the Internet Computer will run cloud-on-cloud — deploying over Amazon, Google, or both. Your cloud. Your rules.

We must reject all centralized "blockchains"! This includes Ripple, Canton, Stellar, Hedera & Algorand Centralization is not the future of finance; requiring permission from an authority is not decentralized! Do not be fooled by their lies, as the truth will set us free: 🧵 Ripple: Has a "Unique Node List", which makes the validators effectively permissioned. As any divergence from this centrally published list would cause a fork, effectively giving the Ripple Foundation & company absolute power & control over the chain Canton: The validator set is totally permissioned! Stellar: A similar set-up to XRP, except that they call it "recommended Tier 1 organizations," which is published by the Stellar Development Foundation. However, just like XRP, a high overlap is required, or you risk forking off the network. Effectively putting the power in the hands of the list creator Hedera: The validator set is totally permissioned! Algorand: The "relay nodes" in ALGO are still totally permissioned. Despite validators being permissionless, anyone now has the option to run a "participation node" after they recently implemented a P2P network as an alternative means to propagate TXs. Which means the relay nodes can no longer act as gatekeepers. However, it is unclear how much removing them entirely would affect performance today. Possibly making them a necessary aspect of ALGO's current design Forms of Consensus: Within a blockchain context, there are only three forms of consensus: Proof of Stake, Proof of Work & Proof of Authority If a blockchain does not use PoS or PoW, it is, by definition, PoA! As this was fundamentally an unsolved problem before blockchain came along, which solved this problem through the use of token-based incentives, either through stake or work Anything that does not fit that consensus model is instead fundamentally based on authority/trust. In the case of XRP & XLM, it is important to keep in mind that choosing who we trust is not the same as trustlessness! Binary Choice: A blockchain is either fully permissionless or it is not. ALGO has permissioned elements in its design, so it is still "centralized". A crude way to use language, but we do still need understandable schelling points in crypto. As decentralization is a spectrum, permissionlesness is only one element of that bigger picture. However, personally, any permissioned elements are a deal breaker for me, as it is so anti-thetical to the ethos of crypto that it defeats its entire raison detre Institutional Adoption: Much like the early internet, big institutions are uncomfortable using fully permissionless, public & decentralized networks. So, much like the early internet, those institutions will be left behind. The big winners are the crypto natives. That is true historically & it will also be true in the future too. The big winners during the early internet were the newcomers, not the old guard, for the same reasons we see playing out in crypto now Conclusion: The future of finance is decentralized & permissionless. If you cannot understand that, it is fine. There are other options for you on the free market But let's not pretend as if these chains are really playing a part in this revolution. Quite the opposite, centralized "crypto" is a distraction that only slows the goals of our movement down So, if you care about crypto. Reject these permissioned chains & demand they decentralize. In the meantime, we should vote with our feet & support chains that carry our movement forward towards its intended goals instead Credible neutrality, censorship resistance, privacy, immutability & more can only be achieved on a fully permissionless & decentralized blockchain That is the revolution we were promised & that is the future we can now bring about with the choices we make collectively Crypto is on the right side of history, disrupting power away from centralized authorities to help create a freer & more equitable world! 🔥

AI agents are about to book flights. Sign contracts. Move money. So how do you prove they actually did what they were told to? At World Computer Day in Davos, Dr. Tricia Wang made a point that's hard to argue with: "That proof does not come from a company or a contract. It has to be cryptographically tamper-proof." The tech already exists. The conversation is just catching up.

The Internet Computer will introduce a cloud engine experience that mirrors what enterprises already know. One click. Your own corner of the cloud. Configured to your needs. Same UX as signing into AWS or Cloudflare — but on the only cloud created by a network. The Internet Computer is becoming enterprise-ready.

And ICP for indigenous artifact redemption. More on this soon.

Loving my OpenClaw agent! Also, the Internet Computer provides a very powerful way for agents to transact multi-chain Using ICP, agents can trustlessly execute TX on other chains, and validate the results using ICP's 48-byte master chain key — no trusted APIs necessary. Example, an agent makes a payment using bitcoin, or stablecoins on Solana. Example, an agent automatically rebalances a portfolio of RWA assets for their human. Quick notes on ICP chain key tech. To this date NO other chain has mastered chain key, and none can do what's described above (some have created pale imitations that enable them to create transactions on other chains without proper safety and trustlessness — but their chains don't sign the results of every single transaction submitted to them using a single master key, which allows the interactions to be trustlessly verified). Only ICP has a 48-byte master key that can be used to validate all interactions with the network, by validating a special signature on results. What's so extraordinary about this feature, which sits at the core of ICP's protocol is that it scales horizontally. That is, even as the network continues growing thanks to self-writing and cloud engines, and even if it has to process a trillion transactions a second, all the interactions with the network can be verified using the network's 48-byte master key. For those that are wondering, of course, this doesn't involve trust, and there is no private key that can be stolen from the network — the special signatures on results are created through BFT-safe collaboration between nodes, scaled out across subnets using Merkle structures. When you are using an app running on ICP, the frontend is automatically creating tx (essentially remote function calls into network software) for you in the background (on ICP, transactions are typically created by the frontends of hosted apps, rather than manually using traditional blockchain wallets). Quite a lot of blockchain's are now trying to pivot to the "onchain cloud narrative," but speaking frankly, they don't know what they're talking about. If they did, it would be possible to upload fully onchain apps to their networks! Be careful out there.

⚡️ $ICP is leading the charge in DePIN! According to @LunarCrush, we're the TOP DePIN Project by Social Activity. This is a testament to our vibrant community and the unstoppable innovation on the Internet Computer. 🚀