Dolphin Foot

@WeTheBrandon why is this funny to you?

The F-35 program was billed as the most advanced stealth fighter ever. It cost us $2 trillion over 20 years. And it gets clipped by a missile belonging to a military that I have been told repeatedly by the Pentagon was totally defeated. LOL. Hope the pilots are OK, tho!

@ArthurSchop88 @TheGlobeIsDead Rail guns don't user line of sight lasers

@TheGlobeIsDead Call me crazy, I'm no scientist, but I do not think that's how lasers work. I could be wrong though because I'm no scientist. 🤣

Rob isn’t the smartest. But you’ve already noticed.

@TrevorL415 "Even cameras lie"

The sensor never literally captured this shot. The camera superimposed it from Deep Fake lunar data. Even cameras lie to fake craters to get you to believe it's a rock that can be landed upon. You can't land on a lie 🤥!

@benwehrman Let me summarize "I have absolutely no idea what I'm talking about and I made a video"

"Gravity" is the most successful single-word brainwashing spell ever cast by the deceivers in control of our world. No "expert" can explain what gravity is or what causes it, and no matter how many dozens of miles up you go (clear videos exist of private rockets going up over 70 miles), the world never starts spinning away at 1,000 MPH. They always land right back in the same place they took off from. This is because the Earth is not spinning. It is a stationary, flat plane, just as we observe and feel with our own senses. There is no "gravity" holding the spinning ball atmosphere in place. The downward force pulling objects toward the Earth is based on density, buoyancy and electrostatics. That's it. [🎥: @holisticnut33]

@Lokistrada @jacksonhinklle The E2D's AN/APY-9 Advanced Hawkeye radar is far superior in this mission that the E-3's outdated legacy system.

@jacksonhinklle The E2 is one of the most inferior AWACS system now in terms of range. It has shorter range and used by carrier fleets. Theatre command platforms like the E3 have not been updated and are being retired.

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 BREAKING: The United States is deploying 5 E-2D Hawkeye airborne early warning aircraft to the Middle East. This indicates that a considerable number of American radar systems have been disabled by Iran.

@Matt_Pinner That's an Iranian aircraft carrier

If you know what show this picture is from, I will follow you.

@BillyZigouras liar! that's a picture of your brainwaves

@TrevorL415 This is actually the size that flat earthers think the moon is

Look at all of that deep fake trained lunar data that the sensor never literally captured.

Where are you getting this information? There have been upgrades of the E-3 radar over the years, as with any system, but the core architecture has remained the same, with the antenna being the limiting factor. And I'm not aware of any recent upgrades (last few years). There are always software updates/bug fixes that are rolled out, but these don't count as major upgrades. My company, and others, looked at redesigning the E-3 radar system around 7 or 8 years ago. We had a fairly large effort underway. The Air Force decided the platform was too out of date and scrapped those plans for a new E-7 with an electronically scanned radar. The E3 will be retired within 10 years

@FootDolphin @jacksonhinklle Had to look it up, but the E3 was just subject to a major upgrade in the last few years

@AULaw24 @jacksonhinklle No, the E3 is an old legacy system and a dead-end. It's a mechanically scanning radar and the entire platform, including aircraft, will be replaced by the E-7 in the future. There will be no major new upgrades to it.

@FootDolphin @jacksonhinklle I’m sorry you don’t think the E3 has been upgraded? The role I imagine where the E2 would excel is drone hunting at lower altitude

Ok, define what you mean by "more powerful". Just raw transmit power? These 2 different systems are purpose built for different missions, with the E-3 primarily operating over land. The newer E2D radar outperforms it in many areas (detecting low-observable targets, clutter rejection, STAP processing, faster detection) that the E-3 can not match. The old E-3 radar is a mechanical scanning system and is slower for detecting small threats like drones and missiles, while the E2D's AESA radar (electronic scanning) excels at that. In many performance areas, the E2D radar is a generational leap over the E-3.

You’re telling me an E3 isn’t a more powerful platform? We have both there. My guess is sending additional,aircraft is to try to improve protection against drones. So the fact that that it has a more powerful system, greater range for detection of threats, something like 12+ specialist on board doesn’t make any difference ….making it more powerful, sure.

@jacksonhinklle It's interesting seeing so many E2D AN/APY-9 radar experts in this thread

@AULaw24 @jacksonhinklle "It’s a relatively low capacity version of the USAF E3 Sentry" This statement is inaccurate and misleading. I don't remember seeing your name when I was working on the IRAD program and then designing the Advanced Hawkey Radar Processor.

No traitor, it’s brings a different set of capacities. It’s a relatively low capacity version of the USAF E3 Sentry, which are operated in the region of the United States and Saudi Arabia. It provides far better “look down“ capacity with respected drones or cruise missiles, then land-based radar. The reason should be obvious, even to a traitorous little dork like yourself.

@gg4lw @Simon_Davies7 @jeranism Would you be willing to speak at our next international radar conference? I'd pay for the entertainment factor

@FootDolphin @Simon_Davies7 @jeranism The word ignorant means to ignore. You’re ignoring the fact that water doesn’t stick to a ball.

Have you ever smoked a midnight joint under the sun in #Antarctica? Didn't think so. Did you ever lead people astray & claim the Earth was flat for 10 yrs & then you found out you were wrong & when you said so, all your former friends hated u & call you sell-out? Didn't think so.

@gg4lw @Simon_Davies7 @jeranism The shape of the earth doesn't care about your ignorance

@FootDolphin @Simon_Davies7 @jeranism That doesn’t prove your fantasy.

@gg4lw @Simon_Davies7 @jeranism I can measure the speed and distance of GPS satellites using a cheap SDR and you are clueless about how any of it actually works

@FootDolphin @Simon_Davies7 @jeranism Sounds pretty stupid when you say what you believe out loud doesn’t it?

@gg4lw @Simon_Davies7 @jeranism I wasn't calling you names. Just stating facts

@FootDolphin @Simon_Davies7 @jeranism Calling me names doesn’t prove your theory, just makes it look like you can’t prove your theory.

@gg4lw @Simon_Davies7 @jeranism Only flat earthers say "sticks to a ball"

@FootDolphin @Simon_Davies7 @jeranism If they’re from NASA then yes they admit that they’re not actual photos themselves. Do an experiment thats repeatable proving the claim that water sticks to a ball.

@gg4lw @Simon_Davies7 @jeranism This is flat earth science. Simple-minded idiots

@FootDolphin @Simon_Davies7 @jeranism I can prove to you in an experiment that it doesn’t that is called proof.

@gg4lw @Simon_Davies7 @jeranism Literally thousands of photos. But they're all fake....right?

@FootDolphin @Simon_Davies7 @jeranism Show me water sticking to a ball maybe it will make more sense to you that way.